how to construct self anti self charge conjugate states
play

How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states? Valeriy V. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states? Valeriy V.


  1. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states? Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov Universidad de Zacatecas, M´ exico June 28, 2012 Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  2. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. Table of Content. Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1. IV. Conclusions. Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  3. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. Outline. We construct self/anti-self charge conjugate (Majorana-like) states for the (1 / 2 , 0) ⊕ (0 , 1 / 2) representation of the Lorentz group, and their analogs for higher spins within the quantum field theory. The problem of the basis rotations and that of the selection of phases in the Dirac-like and Majorana-like field operators are considered. The discrete symmetries properties (P, C, T) are studied. The corresponding dynamical equations are presented. In the (1 / 2 , 0) ⊕ (0 , 1 / 2) representation they obey the Dirac-like equation with eight components, which has been first introduced by Markov. Thus, the Fock space for corresponding quantum fields is doubled (as shown by Ziino). The particular attention has been paid to the questions of chirality and helicity (two concepts which are frequently confused in the literature) for Dirac and Majorana states. We further review several experimental consequences which follow from the previous works of M.Kirchbach et al. on neutrinoless double beta decay, and G.J.Ni et al. on meson lifetimes. Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  4. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. I. MAJORANA SPINORS IN THE MOMENTUM REPRESENTATION. During the 20th century various authors introduced self/anti-self charge-conjugate 4-spinors (including in the momentum representation), see, e. g., [Majorana, Bilenky, Ziino, Ahluwalia2]. Later [Lounesto, Dvoeglazov, Dvoeglazov2, Kirchbach, Rocha1] etc studied these spinors, they found corresponding dynamical equations, gauge transformations and other specific features of them. The definitions are:   0 0 0 − i   0 0 i 0 C = e i θ    K = − e i θ γ 2 K (1)  0 i 0 0 − i 0 0 0 is the anti-linear operator of charge conjugation. K is the complex conjugation operator. As usual, C transforms the u − to v − spinors, and vice versa . We define the self/anti-self charge-conjugate 4-spinors in the Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  5. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. momentum space C λ S , A ( p ) ± λ S , A ( p ) , = (2) C ρ S , A ( p ) ± ρ S , A ( p ) , = (3) where � � ± i Θ φ ∗ L ( p ) λ S , A ( p µ ) = , (4) φ L ( p ) and � � φ R ( p ) ρ S , A ( p ) = . (5) ∓ i Θ φ ∗ R ( p ) The Wigner matrix is � 0 � − 1 Θ [1 / 2] = − i σ 2 = , (6) 1 0 � and φ L , φ R can be boosted with Λ L , R = ( E + m ± ( σ · p ) / 2 m ( E + m ) matrices. Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  6. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. Such definitions of 4-spinors differ, of course, from the original Majorana definition in x-representation: 1 (Ψ D ( x ) + Ψ c ν ( x ) = √ D ( x )) , (7) 2 C ν ( x ) = ν ( x ) that represents the positive real C − parity field operator only. However, the momentum-space Majorana-like spinors open various possibilities for description of neutral particles (with experimental consequences, see [Kirchbach]). For instance,“for imaginary C parities, the neutrino mass can drop out from the single β decay trace and reappear in 0 νββ , a curious and in principle experimentally testable signature for a non-trivial impact of Majorana framework in experiments with polarized sources.” Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  7. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. The rest λ and ρ spinors can be defined in accordance with (4,5) in analogious way with the Dirac spinors:     0 − i � m � m     i 0 λ S    , λ S   ↑ ( 0 ) = ↓ ( 0 ) =  , (8)   1 0 2 2 0 1     0 i � m � m     − i 0     λ A  , λ A ↑ ( 0 ) = ↓ ( 0 ) =  , (9)   2 1 2 0 0 1 Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  8. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions.     1 0 � m � m     0 1     ρ S  , ρ S ↑ ( 0 ) = ↓ ( 0 ) =  , (10)   0 i 2 2 − i 0     1 0 � m � m     0 1     ρ A  , ρ A ↑ ( 0 ) = ↓ ( 0 ) =  . (11)   0 − i 2 2 i 0 Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  9. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. Thus, in this basis with the appropriate normalization (“mass dimension”) the explicite forms of the 4-spinors of the second kind λ S , A ↑↓ ( p ) and ρ S , A ↑↓ ( p ) are:     − i ( p + + m ) ip l i ( p − + m )     1 1 − ip r λ S   , λ S    ↑ ( p ) = √ ↓ ( p ) = √ p − + m    − p l 2 E + m 2 E + m ( p + + m ) − p r (12)     i ( p + + m ) − ip l − i ( p − + m )     1 1 ip r λ A    , λ A   √ √ ↑ ( p ) = ↓ ( p ) = ( p − + m )    − p l 2 E + m 2 E + m ( p + + m ) − p r (13) Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  10. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions.     p + + m p l ( p − + m )     1 p r 1     ρ S  , ρ S √ √ ↑ ( p ) = ↓ ( p ) = i ( p − + m )    ip l 2 E + m 2 E + m − i ( p + + m ) − ip r (14)     p + + m p l ( p − + m )     1 p r 1     ρ A  , ρ A ↑ ( p ) = √ ↓ ( p ) = √  . − i ( p − + m )   − ip l 2 E + m 2 E + m i ( p + + m ) ip r (15) As claimed by [Ahluwalia2] λ and ρ 4-spinors are not the eigenspinors of the helicity. Moreover, λ and ρ are NOT the eigenspinors of the parity, as � � 0 1 opposed to the Dirac case (in this representation P = R , where 1 0 R = ( x → − x )). The indices ↑↓ should be referred to the chiral helicity quantum number introduced in the 60s, η = − γ 5 h , Ref. [SenGupta]. Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  11. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. While Pu σ ( p ) = + u σ ( p ) , Pv σ ( p ) = − v σ ( p ) , (16) we have P λ S , A ( p ) = ρ A , S ( p ) , P ρ S , A ( p ) = λ A , S ( p ) , (17) for the Majorana-like momentum-space 4-spinors on the first quantization level. In this basis one has also the relations between the above-defined 4-spinors: ρ S − i λ A ↓ ( p ) , ρ S ↓ ( p ) = + i λ A ↑ ( p ) = ↑ ( p ) , (18) ρ A + i λ S ↓ ( p ) , ρ A ↓ ( p ) = − i λ S ↑ ( p ) = ↑ ( p ) . (19) Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

  12. Table of Content Outline. I. Majorana Spinors in the Momentum Representation. II. Chirality and Helicity. III. Charge Conjugation and Parity for S = 1 . IV. Conclusions. The normalizations of the spinors λ S , A ↑↓ ( p ) and ρ S , A ↑↓ ( p ) are the following ones: S S ↑ ( p ) λ S ↓ ( p ) λ S λ ↓ ( p ) = − im , λ ↑ ( p ) = + im , (20) A A ↑ ( p ) λ A ↓ ( p ) λ A λ ↓ ( p ) = + im , λ ↑ ( p ) = − im , (21) ρ S ↑ ( p ) ρ S ρ S ↓ ( p ) ρ S ↓ ( p ) = + im , ↑ ( p ) = − im , (22) ρ A ↑ ( p ) ρ A ρ A ↓ ( p ) ρ A ↓ ( p ) = − im , ↑ ( p ) = + im . (23) All other conditions are equal to zero. Valeriy V. Dvoeglazov How to construct self/anti-self charge conjugate states?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend