how to construct deep recurrent neural

How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. PASCANU, C. GULCEHRE, K. CHO, Y. BENGIO PRESENTATION: HAROUN HABEEB PAPER: HTTPS://ARXIV.ORG/ABS/1312.6026 This presentation Motivation Formal RNN paradigm Deep RNN designs


  1. How to Construct Deep Recurrent Neural Networks AUTHORS: R. PASCANU, C. GULCEHRE, K. CHO, Y. BENGIO PRESENTATION: HAROUN HABEEB PAPER: HTTPS://ARXIV.ORG/ABS/1312.6026

  2. This presentation Motivation Formal RNN paradigm Deep RNN designs Experiments Note on training Takeaways

  3. Motivation: Better RNNs? Depth makes feedforward neural networks more expressive What about RNNS? How do you make them deep? Does depth help?

  4. π’Š 𝑒 = 𝑔 β„Ž (π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 ) Conventional 𝒛 𝑒 = 𝑔 𝑝 π’Š 𝑒 RNNs Specifically: β„Ž π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 ; 𝑿, 𝑽 = 𝜚 β„Ž 𝑿 π‘ˆ π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 + 𝑽 𝑼 π’š 𝑒 𝑔 𝑝 π’Š 𝑒 ; 𝑾 = 𝜚 𝑝 (𝑾 π‘ˆ π’Š 𝑒 ) 𝑔 β–ͺ How general is this? β–ͺ How easy is it to represent an LSTM/GRU in this form? β–ͺ What about bias terms? β–ͺ How would you make an LSTM deep?

  5. THE DEEPENING

  6. 𝒛 𝑒 = 𝑔 𝑝 π’Š 𝑒 DT(S)-RNN π’Š 𝑒 = 𝑔 β„Ž (𝑕 π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 , π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 ) Specifically: 𝑧 𝑒 = πœ”(π‘‹β„Ž 𝑒 ) β„Ž 𝑒 = 𝜚 𝑀 ( π‘ˆ 𝜚 π‘€βˆ’1 … π‘Š π‘ˆ 𝜚 1 π‘Š π‘ˆ β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 + 𝑉𝑦 𝑒 π‘Š 𝑀 2 1 + ΰ΄₯ 𝑋 π‘ˆ β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 +ΰ΄₯ 𝑉 π‘ˆ 𝑦 𝑒 )

  7. 𝒛 𝑒 = 𝑔 𝑝 π’Š 𝑒 DOT(S)-RNN π’Š 𝑒 = 𝑔 β„Ž (𝑕 π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 , π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 ) Specifically: π‘ˆ πœ” 𝑀 (… 𝑋 π‘ˆ πœ” 1 𝑋 π‘ˆ β„Ž 𝑒 ) 𝑧 𝑒 = πœ” 0 (𝑋 𝑀 1 β„Ž 𝑒 = 𝜚 𝑀 ( π‘ˆ 𝜚 π‘€βˆ’1 … π‘Š π‘ˆ 𝜚 1 π‘Š π‘ˆ β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 + 𝑉𝑦 𝑒 π‘Š 𝑀 2 1 + ΰ΄₯ 𝑋 π‘ˆ β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 +ΰ΄₯ 𝑉 π‘ˆ 𝑦 𝑒 )

  8. 0 = π’ˆ β„Ž 0 (π’š 𝑒 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 0 π’Š 𝑒 ) sRNN (π‘š) = 𝑔 (π‘š) (π’Š 𝑒 π‘šβˆ’1 , π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 π‘š βˆ€π‘š ∢ π’Š 𝑒 ) β„Ž (𝑀) 𝒛 𝑒 = 𝑔 𝑝 π’Š 𝑒 Specifically: (𝑀) 𝒛 𝑒 = πœ” 𝑋 π‘ˆ π’Š 𝑒 (0) = 𝜚 0 (0) π‘ˆ π’š 𝑒 + 𝑋 π‘ˆ π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 β„Ž 𝑒 𝑉 0 0 π‘š = 𝜚 π‘š π‘šβˆ’1 + 𝑋 (π‘š) π‘ˆ π’Š 𝑒 π‘ˆ π’Š π‘’βˆ’1 βˆ€π‘š: π’Š 𝑒 𝑉 π‘š π‘š

  9. Experiment 0: Parameter count Food for thought: Not clear which one has most number of parameters – sRNN or DOT(S)-RNN.

  10. Experiment 1: Polyphonic Music Prediction Next Task: note(s) Sequence of musical notes Food for thought: Sure, depth helps, but * helps a lot more in this case. What about RNN* and other models with *?

  11. Experiment 2: Language Modelling Next Task : Sequence of characters/words character/word (LM on PTB) Food for thought: Deepening LSTMs? Stack them or DOT(S) them?

  12. Note on training β–ͺ Training RNNs can be hard because of vanishing/exploding gradients. β–ͺ Authors did a bunch of things: β–ͺ Clipped gradients, threshold = 1 β–ͺ Sparse weight matrices ( 𝑋 0 = 20 ) β–ͺ β‡’ max 𝑗,π‘˜ 𝑋 𝑗,π‘˜ = 1 Normalized weight matrices β–ͺ Add gaussian noise to gradients β–ͺ Used dropout, maxout, 𝑀 π‘ž units

  13. Takeaways β–ͺ Plain, shallow RNNs are not great. β–ͺ DOT-RNNs do well. Following should be deep networks β–ͺ 𝑧 = 𝑔(β„Ž, 𝑦) β–ͺ β„Ž 𝑒 = 𝑔 𝑕 𝑦 𝑒 , β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 , 𝑦 𝑒 , β„Ž π‘’βˆ’1 - both 𝑔 and 𝑕 β–ͺ Training can be really hard. β–ͺ Thresholding gradients, Dropout, maxout units are helpful/needed β–ͺ LSTMs are good Questions?

Recommend


More recommend