How the notion of ACCESS guides the organization of a European - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how the notion of access guides the organization of a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How the notion of ACCESS guides the organization of a European - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How the notion of ACCESS guides the organization of a European research infrastructure: the example of DARIAH DARIAH: Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities _ 17 countries in Europe _ Established as an ERIC in 2014


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How the notion of ACCESS guides the

  • rganization of a

European research infrastructure: the example of DARIAH

slide-2
SLIDE 2

DARIAH: Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities

05.04.2017 2 ReferentIn: Thema:

  • _ 17 countries in Europe
  • _ Established as an ERIC in 2014 (European Research

Infrastructure Consortium)

  • _ Strong network of partners in Europe and outside
  • _ Involved in 10 projects
  • _Financed

programs: DARIAH Theme, DARIAH Ambassadors

  • _ An Annual Event
slide-3
SLIDE 3

What „access“ means

05.04.2017 3 ReferentIn: Thema:

Following the Cambridge Dictionary :

  • 1. “the method or possibility of getting near a place or a

person”

  • 2. “the right or opportunity to use or look at something”
slide-4
SLIDE 4

5 problematic points to make DARIAH alive

4

  • Managing interdisciplinarity
  • Managing tensions between national and international

perspectives

  • Speaking to whom?
  • Managing tools
  • Building collaborative tools
slide-5
SLIDE 5

An example: the Strategic Action Points document

5

  • Document which show what DARIAH is already doing and what it should do
  • To give answers to problematic questions
  • A specific redaction’s process:

1. Initial documentation: Laurent Romary for the BoD and the CIO. December 2016/ January 2017 2. Discussions JRC/SMT 12-13/01/2017 3. Circulation to SMT and DCO team on 15 feb to 1st March for comments. 4. Draft 1: by readaction team + CIO to revise for 4th March. 5. DCO to include updated draft in circulation for SB, JRC and NCC on 6th March. NCCs should inform their NRs of the plan at this point to solicit feedback. 6. Comments from SB, JRC, NCC by 31st March. 7. Redraft and circulate by 12th April to NCC and GA for discussion 8. Discussion by NCC the 25th April 2017 9. GA to discuss the plan at vGA on 15th May

  • 10. Final revision to be created, June 2017
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 Objectives of the Document

6

  • Develop and agree this Strategic Action Plan
  • Create and populate the DARIAH Marketplace
  • Sharpen external communications and networks
  • Sharpen internal communications, procedures and

vision

  • Enhance profile in training/education
  • Support and promote research communities

through the DARIAH Working Groups and other structures

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Managing interdisciplinarity

7

_ A registry (still in progress, but planned to be finished in October 2017) _ Organization in transversal Working Groups

  • Cf. « Support and promote research

communities through the DARIAH Working Groups and other structures, including regional hubs », point 6. _ What does it mean « Arts and Humanities fied »? _ Is it the same in every countries? _ How can researchers from different disciplines + countries work together?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Managing tensions between national and international perspectives

8

_ National Representatives _ JRC + NCC committees _ A DARIAH Marketplace (point 2).

When the same tool is developed in parallel in two different countries, how can we know how to assign credit for the development? Which one (and why) should be valued by DARIAH?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DARIAH bodies

05.04.2017 9 ReferentIn: Thema:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Speaking to whom?

05.04.2017 10 ReferentIn: Thema:

  • Partnerships/memberships
  • Kind of projects
  • Point 3 of the document:

external communication to different kinds of users, stakeholders, partners, etc.

Definition of the communities, the stakeholders. How to define which country, partner, people should be include or not? In Europe and abroad? Students or researchers or both? Companies? Public institutions? Speaking about access implies first to define frontiers…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Managing tools

05.04.2017 11 ReferentIn: Thema:

  • The Marketplace
  • Working Groups to help to define the

needs, which is useful and which is less, etc.

  • Point 5 of the document: « Building

DARIAH’s profile in training/education »

Which tools? Formats, contents? Sustainability… Interoperability Training…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building collaborative tools

05.04.2017 12 ReferentIn: Thema:

_ DARIAH strongly engaged to Open Access path. _ DARIAH wiki (developed by German team) _ Basecamp as a project manager tool (not Open Access) _ Rely on national skills How to suggest efficient collaborative tools regarding the Google offer’s for instance? How DARIAH can defend Open Access model and Intellectual Property? How DARIAH can provide such collaborative working tools for a very vast community?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

As a conclusion

13

  • Specific structuration
  • Adaptation to the community
  • Communication
  • Innovation by reuse and transforming the existing
  • Both research and technical training
slide-14
SLIDE 14

25.04.2017 14 ReferentIn: Suzanne Dumouchel

Thank you!

Questions and comments are welcome…