Getting parents involved A field experiment in deprived schools - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

getting parents involved a field experiment in deprived
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Getting parents involved A field experiment in deprived schools - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Getting parents involved A field experiment in deprived schools FrancescoAvvisa-,MarcGurgand NinaGuyon,EricMaurin ParisSchoolofEconomics/JPALEurope Mo-va-on


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Getting parents involved A field experiment in deprived schools

Francesco
Avvisa-,
Marc
Gurgand
 Nina
Guyon,
Eric
Maurin
 Paris
School
of
Economics
/
J‐PAL
Europe


slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mo-va-on


► Significant
differences
in
parental
involvement

 
across
families
with
different
social
status
 ► Any
causal
rela-onships
between
the
rela-vely
good
 performance
at
school
of
pupil
from
rich
families
and
 the
rela-vely
strong
involvement
of
their
parents?


slide-3
SLIDE 3

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Ques-ons


 
Is
it
really
possible
to
improve
parents’
involvement
?
  
 Has
 increased
 parental
 involvement
 any
 effect
 on
 children?
  
 Does
 the
 effect
 on
 program
 par-cipants
 spread
 out
 on


  • ther
families?


► Specific
importance
of
spillovers
as
only
a
minority
of
families
 volunteer
to
par-cipate
in
such
a
program


slide-4
SLIDE 4

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

A
randomized
evalua-on


  • 1. Iden-fy
volonteer
parents
in
all
the
schools

  • 2. Within
each
school,
randomize
half
classes

  • 3. Only
volonteer
parents
in
treated
classes
are
invited
to
the


mee-ngs
 ► Ensures
that
families
in
treated
and
control
classes
are
similar
 ► Significant
differences
by
the
end
of
the
year
are
surely
 aTributed
to
the
interven-on 
Impact
causal
des
débats


slide-5
SLIDE 5

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Protocol:
Four
groups


Treated Classes (randomized in) Control classes (randomized out) Volonteer Non volonteers Volonteer Non volonteers

Compare Compare

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Sample


► 37
middle
schools,
200
classes,
5,000
6th
grade
pupils
 ► 20%
volonteers
(slightly
higher
social
background)
 ► Among
volonteers,
actual
take‐up
rate
57%


slide-7
SLIDE 7

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Data


► Parents:
year‐end
survey
(response
rate
80%)
 
Individual
appointments
with
teachers,
par5cipate
in
parental


  • rganiza5on,
understand
local
school,
etc.


► Pupils:
Normalized
tests
beginning
and
end
of
year
 
+
school
level
informa-on


slide-8
SLIDE 8

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Parental
involvement


slide-9
SLIDE 9

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Parental
involvement


► Increase
about
10%
to
30%
of
a
standard‐devia-on
 ► Same
order
of
magnitude
as
between
white‐collar
and
blue‐ collar
families
 ► Effect
on
parents
translates
into
significant
improvement
in
 pupils’
behavior


slide-10
SLIDE 10

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Pupils’
behavior


slide-11
SLIDE 11

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Pupils’
behavior
and
cogni-ve
outcomes


VOLONTEERS
 NON‐VOLONTEERS
 Treated
 Control
 Treated
 Control
 Discipl.
sanc-ons
 7.0%
 10.6%
 8.9%
 11.0%
 Honors
 37.2%
 34.5%
 38.9%
 34.1%


► French:
+7%
of
s.d.
for
teacher
marks
and
+8%
of
a
s.d.
for
 easiest
items
of
external
test
 ► No
impact
in
Maths


slide-12
SLIDE 12

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Take
away


► The
programme
has
demonstrated
effects
on
parental
 involvement
and
child
behavior
–
to
a
smaller
extent
on
 cogni-ve
achievement
 ► The
behavior
of
all
students
in
the
selected
classes
improved,
 including
those
whose
parents
did
not
par-cipate


slide-13
SLIDE 13

TRADUIRE LA RECHERCHE EN ACTION

Policy
implica-on


► Important
issue
but
limited
poli-cal
ac-on
 ► Simple
and
inexpensive
program
 ► Rigorous
evalua-on:
can
convince
schools
or
governments
that
 such
ac-on
is
worth
taking
 ► Generaliza-on
going
on
in
France