GARY Deutsches Aortenklappenregister German Aortic Valve RegistrY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GARY Deutsches Aortenklappenregister German Aortic Valve RegistrY - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GARY Deutsches Aortenklappenregister German Aortic Valve RegistrY C. W. Hamm, F.W. Mohr, H. Mllmann, D. Holzhey, A. Beckmann, H.-R. Figulla, J. Cremer, K.-H. Kuck, R. Lange, R. Zahn, S. Sack, G. Schuler, T. Walther, F. Beyersdorf, M. Bhm,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GARY

Christian W. Hamm

Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center Bad Nauheim and Medical Clinic I, University of Giessen, Germany

  • C. W. Hamm, F.W. Mohr, H. Möllmann, D. Holzhey,
  • A. Beckmann, H.-R. Figulla, J. Cremer, K.-H. Kuck, R. Lange,
  • R. Zahn, S. Sack, G. Schuler, T. Walther, F. Beyersdorf,
  • M. Böhm, G. Heusch, A.-K. Funkat, T. Meinertz, T. Neumann,
  • K. Papoutsis, S. Schneider, A. Welz for the GARY-Executive

Board

Deutsches Aortenklappenregister

German Aortic Valve RegistrY

slide-2
SLIDE 2

KERCKHOFF HERZ- UND THORAXZENTRUM UNIVERSITÄTSKLINIKUM GIESSEN

Affiliation/Financial Relationship Company 1. Honoraria for lectures Medtronic, Edwards 2. Honoraria for advisory board activities Medtronic 3. Participation in clinical trials Medtronic, Edwards, Symetis, Jena Valve 4. Financial shares and options: no

Speaker’s name: Christian W. Hamm I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report:

Disclosures

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GARY

Rationale

  • Nationwide complete survey of patients with aortic

valve stenosis undergoing invasive procedures:

  • surgical (AVR),
  • catheter-based (TAVI) transfemoral ,
  • catheter-based (TAVI) transapical,
  • valvuloplasty.
  • To evaluate catheter-based procedures in

comparison to surgical aortic valve replacement.

  • Develop criteria for an adequate patient selection of

best treatment modality.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GARY

Design

  • Prospective, controlled, multicenter registry.
  • All patients undergoing an invasive therapy for

acquired aortic valve disease consecutively included.

  • The only exclusion criterion: no informed consent.
  • Follow-up: in-hospital, 30 days, 1,3, 5 years.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

GARY

Data Management and Sponsorship

  • Data management:

BQS – Institut für Qualität & Patientensicherheit.

  • Sponsorship:

Investigator initiated study with unrestricted grant from: Edwards, Medtronic, Symetis, Jena Valve, St Jude, Sorin

  • Support:

German Cardiac Society (DGK) German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GARY

Patients

53 cardiac surgery units 69 cardiology units

13.860 patients

6.523 surgical AVR without CABG 3.462 surgical AVR with CABG 2.694 transvascular TAVI 1.181 transapical TAVI

Inclusion from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2011

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GARY

AVR without CABG AVR with CABG Transvasc. TAVI Transapical TAVI

CAD 18.6 97.1 53.6 56.1 LV-EF <30% 3.1 5.1 9.3 7.5

  • A. fib.

15.9 15.0 28.9 29.5

  • Art. HT

79.5 86.1 86.4 90.0

  • Pulm. HT

10.8 11.1 39.8 23.4 COPD 10.0 12.2 19.8 20.5 IDDM 8.2 12.9 13.3 17.5

Baseline Characteristics

all p<0.001

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GARY

TAVI Valve Type

transapical n = 1.181 transvascular

Others Others

n = 2.695

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GARY

Baseline Characteristics

33,3% 44,9% 86,3% 84,0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

Surgical AVR TAVI

Patients > 75 years

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GARY

Baseline Characteristics

39,0% 28,4%

58,8%

49,8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical

Female gender

Surgical AVR TAVI

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GARY

Baseline Characteristics

62 % 69 % 86 % 86 %

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical

n=6523 n=3462 n=2694 n=1181

Heart failure (NYHA III/IV)

Surgical AVR TAVI

slide-12
SLIDE 12

GARY

Results – Outcome

2,1% 4,5% 5,1% 7,7%

0,0% 1,0% 2,0% 3,0% 4,0% 5,0% 6,0% 7,0% 8,0% 9,0%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical Surgical AVR TAVI

Mortality (in-hospital)

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

slide-13
SLIDE 13

GARY

Risk-adjusted In-Hospital Mortality

0,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 4,0 5,0 6,0 7,0

TAVI transvascular TAVI transvascular TAVI transapical TAVI transapical

≥ 75 years < 75 years

Reference: AVR without CABG

slide-14
SLIDE 14

GARY

2,2% 3,6% 3,7% 3,5%

0,0% 0,5% 1,0% 1,5% 2,0% 2,5% 3,0% 3,5% 4,0%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical Surgical AVR TAVI

Cerebrovascular Events

Results – Outcome

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GARY

1,0% 1,6% 11,9% 2,5% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical Surgical AVR TAVI

Vascular complications

Results – Procedure

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GARY

4,6% 3,9% 23,7% 9,9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical

Results – Procedure

Surgical AVR TAVI

New Pacemaker

n=6517 n=3458 n=2689 n=1177

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GARY

10 20 30 40 50

without CABG with CABG transvascular transapical

  • log. EuroSCORE (%)

EuroSCORE

Results – Risk Score

TAVI Surgical AVR

// //

slide-18
SLIDE 18

GARY

Results – Euro Score

< 10% < 20% < 30% ≥ 30% < 10% < 20% < 30% ≥ 30% < 10% < 20% < 30% ≥ 30% < 10% < 20% < 30% ≥ 30%

  • bserved 1,3% 3,3% 3,8% 7,8%

2,6% 4,8% 8,5% 17,7% 3,9% 3,5% 4,7% 7,7% 3,6% 5,5% 6,5% 13,6% expected 4,7% 13,7% 24,3% 45,3% 5,3% 14,0% 24,1% 45,0% 7,3% 14,5% 24,5% 48,4% 7,4% 14,6% 24,2% 47,4%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%

Surgical AVR TAVI

without CABG transapical transvascular with CABG

Euro-Score in-hospital mortality

slide-19
SLIDE 19

GARY

German Aortic Valve Disease Score „AKL-Score“

Age (5 risk classes) LV-EF (2 risk classes) Gender (female) Redo-procedure Body mass index (2 risk classes) Infection (endocarditis) Heart failure (NYHA) Peripheral arterial disease Myocardial infarction within last three weeks Chronic obstructive lung disease (2 risk classes) Critical preoperative status Renal failure Pulmonary hypertension Emergency Rhythm (no sinus rhythm)

:

http://www.bqs-outcome.de/2008/ergebnisse/leistungsbereiche/hch

slide-20
SLIDE 20

GARY

AKL Score Distribution

TAVI Surgical AVR

Without CABG With CABG transvascular transapical

slide-21
SLIDE 21

GARY

Results – AKL Risk Score

Surgical AVR TAVI

AKL-Score in-hospital mortality

< 3% < 6% < 10% ≥ 10% < 3% < 6% < 10% ≥ 10% < 3% < 6% < 10% ≥ 10% < 3% < 6% < 10% ≥ 10%

  • bserved 1,3% 3,5% 6,6% 9,0%

2,7% 7,1% 8,2% 16,9% 2,8% 3,9% 5,0% 8,1% 5,0% 4,9% 5,1% 16,9% expected 1,3% 4,1% 7,5% 17,0% 1,5% 4,2% 7,6% 19,7% 2,1% 4,4% 7,7% 19,0% 2,1% 4,4% 7,7% 18,9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

without CABG transapical transvascular with CABG

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GARY

Conclusions

  • First large scale registry on surgical & catheter

based procedures.

  • TAVI performed predominantly in high risk patients.
  • AKL score better reflects outcome than EuroScore.
  • In-hospital mortality and complications comparable

to randomized controlled studies.

  • In high risk patients in-hospital mortality with TAVI

at least as good as with surgical AVR.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

GARY

Thank you!