SLIDE 1 Functional resilience in neural networks
Mediterranean School of Complex Networks
Edward Laurence September 5, 2017
Département de physique, de génie physique, et d’optique Université Laval, Québec, Canada
SLIDE 2
1
Resilience Ability to recover the original state in a reasonnable short period of time. Robustness - Opposite of vulnerability Difficulty to modify the state of a system.
SLIDE 3
2
The brain is resilient Plasticity, compensation, ... The details and strategies are still unknown
SLIDE 4
3 Connectomics
Nodes Neurons of activity xi(t) Edges Synapses of weight wij(t) Perturbations ∆xi(t), ∆wij(t), edges/nodes removal, ...
SLIDE 5
4 TOC
Effective formalism Description Application to neural networks Approximations and errors Adaptive connectivity Special behaviors Measures of resilience
SLIDE 6
5 Effective formalism | Description
Effective formalism Presented by Gao et al. 2016
SLIDE 7 6 Effective formalism | Description
N-dimensional complete system
N
wijG(xi, xj)
SLIDE 8 6 Effective formalism | Description
N-dimensional complete system
N
wijG(xi, xj)
SLIDE 9 6 Effective formalism | Description
N-dimensional complete system
N
wijG(xi, xj) 1-dimensional effective system
- xeff F(xeff) + βeffG(xeff, xeff)
xeff L x
; βeff L s
L x Neighborhood average of x
SLIDE 10 7 Effective formalism | Neural networks
1-dimensional effective system
- xeff F(xeff) + βeffG(xeff, xeff)
SLIDE 11 7 Effective formalism | Neural networks
1-dimensional effective system
- xeff F(xeff) + βeffG(xeff, xeff)
Neural dynamics - Hopfield model
wijσ
xj − µ σ(y) 1 1 + e−y
3 6 9 y 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 σ(y)
SLIDE 12 7 Effective formalism | Neural networks
1-dimensional effective system
- xeff F(xeff) + βeffG(xeff, xeff)
Neural dynamics - Hopfield model
wijσ
xj − µ σ(y) 1 1 + e−y
3 6 9 y 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 σ(y)
xeff − µ
SLIDE 13 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 14 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 15 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 16 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 17 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 18 8 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
SLIDE 19 9 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Stationnary state xeff 0
(a)
SLIDE 20 10 Effective formalism | Neural networks
xeff − µ Good approximation for Homogeneous network Low inhibition High reciprocity wij wji
SLIDE 21
Adaptive connectivity
11
SLIDE 22
12 Plasticity
Resilience Ability to recover the original state in a reasonnable short period of time.
SLIDE 23 12 Plasticity
Resilience Ability to recover the original state in a reasonnable short period of time. Modified Hebb’s rule
S (σiσj − wijσ2 j )
; σi σ[λ(xi − µ)]
SLIDE 24 13 Recuperation
S (σiσj − wijσ2 j )
; σi σ[λ(xi − µ)] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
βeff
2 4 6 8 10
xeff
τ −1
S
= 1 τ −1
S
= 0.7 τ −1
S
= 0.68 τ −1
S
= 0.3
SLIDE 25
14 Measures of resilience
How to quantify resilience?
SLIDE 26
14 Measures of resilience
How to quantify resilience? Recovery time Energy of recuperation Maximum damage Sensibility dxeff dβeff
SLIDE 27 15 Measures of resilience | Time of recuperation
Recovery time Time to return in the surroundings of the original state
No recovery
SLIDE 28 16 Measures of resilience | Time of recuperation
Recovery time Time to return in the surroundings of the original state
No recovery
Critical slowing down
SLIDE 29
Conclusion
17
SLIDE 30 18 Conclusion
Effective formalism Simple to use on neural dynamics. Valid for homogeneous, low inhibition and high reciprocity.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
βeff
2 4 6 8 10
xeff
τ −1
S
= 1 τ −1
S
= 0.7 τ −1
S
= 0.68 τ −1
S
= 0.3
Resilience Introduce adaptive connectivity Recovery time is a good indicator of catastrophe
SLIDE 31
19 Thank you
Collaborators Patrick Desrosiers Nicolas Doyon Louis J. Dubé dynamica.phy.ulaval.ca