FROM F-THEORY TO DYNAMIC GLSM Physics and Geometry of F-theory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

from f theory to dynamic glsm
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FROM F-THEORY TO DYNAMIC GLSM Physics and Geometry of F-theory - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FABIO APRUZZI FROM F-THEORY TO DYNAMIC GLSM Physics and Geometry of F-theory (2017), ICTP, Trieste Based on 1602.04221 & 1610.00718 in collaboration with Falk Hassler, Jonathan Heckman and Ilarion Melnikov and see also 1601.02015 by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FROM F-THEORY TO DYNAMIC GLSM

FABIO APRUZZI

Physics and Geometry of F-theory (2017), ICTP, Trieste

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Based on 1602.04221 & 1610.00718 in collaboration with Falk Hassler, Jonathan Heckman and Ilarion Melnikov and see also 1601.02015 by Sakura Schäfer-Nameki and Timo Weigand

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

slide-4
SLIDE 4

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

4D Theories F on CY4:

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

4D Theories

… almost everybody in the audience

F on CY4:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

4D Theories 6D (SCFTs) Theories

… almost everybody in the audience

F on CY4: F on CY3:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

4D Theories 6D (SCFTs) Theories

… almost everybody in the audience … a large subset of you

F on CY4: F on CY3:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

2D (0,2) Theories 4D Theories 6D (SCFTs) Theories

… almost everybody in the audience … a large subset of you

F on CY4: F on CY3: F on CY5:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A RECENT HISTORY REVIEW

2D (0,2) Theories 4D Theories 6D (SCFTs) Theories

… almost everybody in the audience … a large subset of you … a smaller subset of you

F on CY4: F on CY3: F on CY5:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

F-THEORY

Construction of 2D (0,2) CFTs

MAIN IDEA

CY3

CY5

2D (0,2) Theories

Kähler 4-Manifold + Twist

6D (SCFTs) Theories

slide-11
SLIDE 11

▸ Generating novel 2D SCFTs ▸ 2D Theories are Closely Related to String Theories ▸ UV Completion of Non-Critical Strings

WHY?

MOTIVATIONS

slide-12
SLIDE 12

▸ Generating novel 2D SCFTs ▸ 2D Theories are Closely Related to String Theories ▸ UV Completion of Non-Critical Strings

WHY?

MOTIVATIONS

Energy IR UV

Deff >> 10

2D GLSM

+

Extra

+

Gravity

MKK Mstring

slide-13
SLIDE 13

▸ Relevant for Time-Dependent and de Sitter Backgrounds ▸ Generating novel 2D SCFTs ▸ 2D Theories are Closely Related to String Theories ▸ UV Completion of Non-Critical Strings

Hellerman; Maloney, Silverstein; + Strominger

WHY?

MOTIVATIONS

Energy IR UV

Deff >> 10

2D GLSM

+

Extra

+

Gravity

MKK Mstring

slide-14
SLIDE 14

WHAT’S THE PLAN?

OUTLINE

  • 1. GLSMs from F-theory on CY5 and Heterotic on CY4
  • 2. Extra Sectors in F-theory
  • 3. Dynamic GLSMs from 6D (1,0) SCFTs on 4-Manifolds
  • 4. Anomaly Polynomials and Central Charges
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5

F-THEORY ON CY5

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5 B4 y2 = x3 + f(B4)x + g(B4)

Elliptically Fibered

B4

F-THEORY ON CY5

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5 B4 y2 = x3 + f(B4)x + g(B4)

Elliptically Fibered

O(−4KB4)

O(−6KB4)

B4

Section: Homogeneous polynomial of a certain degree

F-THEORY ON CY5

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5 B4 y2 = x3 + f(B4)x + g(B4)

Elliptically Fibered

O(−4KB4)

O(−6KB4)

B4

Section: Homogeneous polynomial of a certain degree

F-THEORY ON CY5

Non-Compact, Gravity decoupled

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5 B4 y2 = x3 + f(B4)x + g(B4)

Elliptically Fibered

O(−4KB4)

O(−6KB4)

B4 X3 ∆ = 4f 3 + 27g2 = 0

  • 7 Branes wrap

2D Spacetime + Kähler Threefold X3

Section: Homogeneous polynomial of a certain degree

F-THEORY ON CY5

Non-Compact, Gravity decoupled

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 1. THE ROAD FROM F-THEORY TO 2D

CY5 B4 y2 = x3 + f(B4)x + g(B4)

Elliptically Fibered

O(−4KB4)

O(−6KB4)

B4 X3 ∆ = 4f 3 + 27g2 = 0

  • 7 Branes wrap

2D Spacetime + Kähler Threefold X3

Section: Homogeneous polynomial of a certain degree Vanishing Degrees of : Kodaira Classification

(f, g, ∆)

Gauge theory on 7 Branes (Compact)

F-THEORY ON CY5

Non-Compact, Gravity decoupled

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 1. THE STRATEGY

10 SYM:

  • Isometry

L10D = 1 4g2

Y M

Z d10x

  • Tr(F IJFIJ) + 2iχΓIDIχ
  • 7 Branes

SO(1, 9) → SO(1, 7) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R

X3

(4D) Beasley, Heckman, Vafa; Donagi-Wijnholt

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 1. THE STRATEGY

10 SYM:

  • Isometry

L10D = 1 4g2

Y M

Z d10x

  • Tr(F IJFIJ) + 2iχΓIDIχ
  • 7 Branes

SO(1, 9) → SO(1, 7) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R

X3

  • Topological Twist

SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × SU(3) × U(1)X × U(1)R

(4D) Beasley, Heckman, Vafa; Donagi-Wijnholt

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 1. THE STRATEGY

10 SYM:

  • Isometry

L10D = 1 4g2

Y M

Z d10x

  • Tr(F IJFIJ) + 2iχΓIDIχ
  • 7 Branes

SO(1, 9) → SO(1, 7) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R

X3

  • Topological Twist

SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × SU(3) × U(1)X × U(1)R

Jtop = JX + 3 2JR

(4D) Beasley, Heckman, Vafa; Donagi-Wijnholt

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 1. THE STRATEGY

10 SYM:

  • Isometry

L10D = 1 4g2

Y M

Z d10x

  • Tr(F IJFIJ) + 2iχΓIDIχ
  • 7 Branes

SO(1, 9) → SO(1, 7) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R

X3

  • Topological Twist

SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × SU(3) × U(1)X × U(1)R

Jtop = JX + 3 2JR

(4D) Beasley, Heckman, Vafa; Donagi-Wijnholt

A(10)

I

χ(10)

Chiral Superfield (CS) Multiplets: Vector Multiplet:

V(0,0) v+ D(0,1) ¯ ∂A Φ(3,0)

φ(3,0) ψ+,(0,1) χ+,(3,0) λ−,(0,2) Λ−,(0,2)

Fermi Multiplet:

µ−

{

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 1. THE STRATEGY

10 SYM:

  • Isometry

L10D = 1 4g2

Y M

Z d10x

  • Tr(F IJFIJ) + 2iχΓIDIχ
  • 7 Branes

SO(1, 9) → SO(1, 7) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R

X3

  • Topological Twist

SO(1, 1) × U(3) × U(1)R → SO(1, 1) × SU(3) × U(1)X × U(1)R

Jtop = JX + 3 2JR

(4D) Beasley, Heckman, Vafa; Donagi-Wijnholt

Form degree on the 3fold

A(10)

I

χ(10)

Chiral Superfield (CS) Multiplets: Vector Multiplet:

V(0,0) v+ D(0,1) ¯ ∂A Φ(3,0)

φ(3,0) ψ+,(0,1) χ+,(3,0) λ−,(0,2) Λ−,(0,2)

Fermi Multiplet:

µ−

{

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2D GLSM Action & Equations of Motion

  • 1. THE EFFECTIVE THEORY: BULK ACTION ON 7 BRANES

E(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ3,1 = F(0,2)

J(3,1) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ0,2 = D(0,1)Φ(3,0)

F(0,2) = [D(0,1), D(0,1)]

Wtop = Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(0,2) ∧ D(0,1)Φ(3,0)
  • +

Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(3,1) ∧ F(0,2)
  • L2D =

Z

X3

  • (Kinetic Terms) + (DTerms) − |E|2 − |J|2

¯ ∂Aφ(3,0) = 0

F(0,2) = 0

ωX3 ∧ ωX3 ∧ F(1,1) + [φ(3,0), φ(0,3)] = 0

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2D GLSM Action & Equations of Motion

  • 1. THE EFFECTIVE THEORY: BULK ACTION ON 7 BRANES

E(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ3,1 = F(0,2)

J(3,1) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ0,2 = D(0,1)Φ(3,0)

E.o.M:

F(0,2) = [D(0,1), D(0,1)]

Wtop = Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(0,2) ∧ D(0,1)Φ(3,0)
  • +

Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(3,1) ∧ F(0,2)
  • L2D =

Z

X3

  • (Kinetic Terms) + (DTerms) − |E|2 − |J|2

¯ ∂Aφ(3,0) = 0

F(0,2) = 0

ωX3 ∧ ωX3 ∧ F(1,1) + [φ(3,0), φ(0,3)] = 0

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2D GLSM Action & Equations of Motion

  • 1. THE EFFECTIVE THEORY: BULK ACTION ON 7 BRANES

E(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ3,1 = F(0,2)

J(3,1) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ0,2 = D(0,1)Φ(3,0)

E.o.M:

Susy variations match the Action & E.o.M.

F(0,2) = [D(0,1), D(0,1)]

Wtop = Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(0,2) ∧ D(0,1)Φ(3,0)
  • +

Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(3,1) ∧ F(0,2)
  • L2D =

Z

X3

  • (Kinetic Terms) + (DTerms) − |E|2 − |J|2

¯ ∂Aφ(3,0) = 0

F(0,2) = 0

ωX3 ∧ ωX3 ∧ F(1,1) + [φ(3,0), φ(0,3)] = 0

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2D GLSM Action & Equations of Motion

  • 1. THE EFFECTIVE THEORY: BULK ACTION ON 7 BRANES

E(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ3,1 = F(0,2)

J(3,1) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ0,2 = D(0,1)Φ(3,0)

E.o.M:

Susy variations match the Action & E.o.M.

F(0,2) = [D(0,1), D(0,1)]

Wtop = Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(0,2) ∧ D(0,1)Φ(3,0)
  • +

Z

X3

Tr

  • Λ(3,1) ∧ F(0,2)
  • L2D =

Z

X3

  • (Kinetic Terms) + (DTerms) − |E|2 − |J|2

Note: we presented here an action with all the KK modes, but at low energy only 0-modes appear, counted by bundle cohomologies on X3

¯ ∂Aφ(3,0) = 0

F(0,2) = 0

ωX3 ∧ ωX3 ∧ F(1,1) + [φ(3,0), φ(0,3)] = 0

slide-30
SLIDE 30

2D GLSM Action & Equations of Motion

  • 1. THE EFFECTIVE THEORY FROM HETEROTIC ON CY4

E.o.M.

E(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ(odd)

(0,2)

= F(even)

(0,2)

J(0,2) = ∂Wtop ∂Λ(even)

(0,2)

= F(odd)

(0,2)

F(0,2) → F(even)

(0,2)

+ F(odd)

(0,2)

Relation to F-theory

Z2 : Ω(4,0) 7! Ω(4,0)

Wtop = Z

Y4

Ω(4,0) ∧ Tr

  • Λ(0,2) ∧ F(0,2)
  • L2D =

Z

Y4

  • (Kinetic Terms) + (DTerms) − |E|2 − |J|2

Y4 ∼ = O(KX3) → X3

F(0,2) = ωY4xF(1,1) = 0

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • 1. BACK TO F-THEORY: LOCALIZED MATTER

B4 X1

3

X2

3

Q ∈ K1/2

S

⊗ R1 ⊗ R2 Qc ∈ K1/2

S

⊗ R∨

1 ⊗ R∨ 2

Ψ ∈ Ω(0,1)

S

(K1/2

S

⊗ R1 ⊗ R2) Ψc ∈ Ω(0,1)

S

(K1/2

S

⊗ R∨

1 ⊗ R∨ 2 )

S

Surface

  • Triple and Quartic Intersections localizing on curves and points

Wtop,S = Z

S

hQc, Λ(0,2)Qi + ⌦ Ψc,

  • ∂ + A1 + A2
  • Q

↵ + ⌦ Qc,

  • ∂ + A1 + A2
  • Ψ

Wtop,Σ = Z

Σ

fαβγ δΨ(α)δQ(β)δQ(γ)

Wtop,p = hαβγδ ⇣ δΨ(α)δQ(β)δQ(γ)δQ(δ)⌘ |p

some bundles on X1

3 X2 3

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 2. AN EXAMPLE

X3 = P2 × P1 y2 = x3 + f(v, X3)x + g(v, x3) B4 = Nv → X3

f(v, X3) ∼ v4f(X3)

g(v, X3) ∼ v5g(X3)

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • 2. AN EXAMPLE

X3 = P2 × P1

Kodaira

Assume No non-trivial bundle

  • n the 3fold

y2 = x3 + f(v, X3)x + g(v, x3) B4 = Nv → X3

f(v, X3) ∼ v4f(X3)

E8 Gauge Symmetry in 2D

g(v, X3) ∼ v5g(X3)

V(0,0), D(0,1), Λ(0,2), Φ(3,0)

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • 2. AN EXAMPLE

X3 = P2 × P1

Kodaira

Assume No non-trivial bundle

  • n the 3fold

y2 = x3 + f(v, X3)x + g(v, x3) B4 = Nv → X3

f(v, X3) ∼ v4f(X3)

E8 Gauge Symmetry in 2D

In cohomology, we have only non-trivial 0 and 2 forms on X3 = P2 × P1

g(v, X3) ∼ v5g(X3)

V(0,0), D(0,1), Λ(0,2), Φ(3,0)

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 2. AN EXAMPLE

X3 = P2 × P1

Kodaira

Assume No non-trivial bundle

  • n the 3fold

y2 = x3 + f(v, X3)x + g(v, x3) B4 = Nv → X3

f(v, X3) ∼ v4f(X3)

E8 Gauge Symmetry in 2D

Only zero modes that survive are the one associated to gaugino & Fermi In cohomology, we have only non-trivial 0 and 2 forms on X3 = P2 × P1

6= 0

g(v, X3) ∼ v5g(X3)

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • sign given by

chirality of fermions in the multiplets

V(0,0), D(0,1), Λ(0,2), Φ(3,0)

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • 2. AN EXAMPLE

X3 = P2 × P1

Kodaira

Assume No non-trivial bundle

  • n the 3fold

y2 = x3 + f(v, X3)x + g(v, x3) B4 = Nv → X3

f(v, X3) ∼ v4f(X3)

E8 Gauge Symmetry in 2D

Only zero modes that survive are the one associated to gaugino & Fermi In cohomology, we have only non-trivial 0 and 2 forms on X3 = P2 × P1 Anomalous!

6= 0

g(v, X3) ∼ v5g(X3)

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • sign given by

chirality of fermions in the multiplets

V(0,0), D(0,1), Λ(0,2), Φ(3,0)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
slide-38
SLIDE 38

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

SGreen−Schwarz ∝ Z B2 ∧ X8(F, R)

Tadpole Cancellation

Extra Sectors! Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
slide-39
SLIDE 39

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

SGreen−Schwarz ∝ Z B2 ∧ X8(F, R)

Tadpole Cancellation

Extra Sectors! In the previous example, spacetime D3 branes wrapping compact curves Q ⊕ (Qc)† ∈ H0(Σ, RΣ)

Ψ ⊕ (Ψc)† ∈ H1(Σ, RΣ)

some bundle on compact curve

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • CS Mult.:

Fermi mult.:

slide-40
SLIDE 40

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

SGreen−Schwarz ∝ Z B2 ∧ X8(F, R)

Tadpole Cancellation

Extra Sectors! In the previous example, spacetime D3 branes wrapping compact curves Q ⊕ (Qc)† ∈ H0(Σ, RΣ)

Ψ ⊕ (Ψc)† ∈ H1(Σ, RΣ)

some bundle on compact curve sum of k trivial bundles on the curve

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • +Ind(Rep(E8)) × k × (#(Q) + #(Qc)) = 0

RΣ = O⊕k

Σ

CS Mult.: Fermi mult.:

slide-41
SLIDE 41

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

SGreen−Schwarz ∝ Z B2 ∧ X8(F, R)

Tadpole Cancellation

Extra Sectors! In the previous example, spacetime D3 branes wrapping compact curves Q ⊕ (Qc)† ∈ H0(Σ, RΣ)

Ψ ⊕ (Ψc)† ∈ H1(Σ, RΣ)

some bundle on compact curve sum of k trivial bundles on the curve

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • 2D GLSM

Extra

+Ind(Rep(E8)) × k × (#(Q) + #(Qc)) = 0 RΣ = O⊕k

Σ

CS Mult.: Fermi mult.:

slide-42
SLIDE 42

EXTRA SECTORS

  • 2. WE NEED MORE
  • No reason that a priori the GLSM is anomaly free

SGreen−Schwarz ∝ Z B2 ∧ X8(F, R)

Tadpole Cancellation

Extra Sectors! In the previous example, spacetime D3 branes wrapping compact curves Q ⊕ (Qc)† ∈ H0(Σ, RΣ)

Ψ ⊕ (Ψc)† ∈ H1(Σ, RΣ)

some bundle on compact curve sum of k trivial bundles on the curve

Igauge = −Ind(Adj(E8)) ×

  • #(V(0,0)) + #(Λ(0,2))
  • Note: other Extra Sector, D3 wrapping non-compact curves, contribuite extra

Fermi multiplets

2D GLSM Extra

+Ind(Rep(E8)) × k × (#(Q) + #(Qc)) = 0 RΣ = O⊕k

Σ

CS Mult.: Fermi mult.:

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

) SCFT at Singularity

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Coupling, gauge kinetic term

L ⊃ t(6D)Tr(F ∧ ∗F) SCFT at Singularity Far out in Tensor Branch

P1

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Coupling, gauge kinetic term

L ⊃ t(6D)Tr(F ∧ ∗F) SCFT at Singularity Far out in Tensor Branch

P1

Compactify on M4

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Coupling, gauge kinetic term

L ⊃ t(6D)Tr(F ∧ ∗F) SCFT at Singularity Far out in Tensor Branch

P1

Compactify on M4

*

t(2D) ∼ t(6D)Vol(M4)

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • 3. (DYNAMIC) DGLSM FROM 6D (1,0) SCFTS ON 4-MANIFOLDS

Single gauge group, G, 6D (1,0) theories F-theory on elliptically fibered CY3 on B2 = O(−n) → P1 Multiplets: (bosonic components)

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Coupling, gauge kinetic term

L ⊃ t(6D)Tr(F ∧ ∗F) SCFT at Singularity Far out in Tensor Branch

P1

Compactify on M4

*

t(2D) ∼ t(6D)Vol(M4)

Dynamic GLSM t(2D)Tr(F+−F +−)

Morrison-Taylor; Heckman-Morrison-Vafa+Del Zotto+Tomasiello+Rudelius;

3 ≤ n ≤ 12

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, FIELD CONTENT

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Compactify on M4

  • Two ways of reading off the 2D multiplets from 6D

1) suppose the 4-Manifold is Kähler, then apply the following Topological Twist

SO(1, 5) × SU(2)R6D → SO(1, 1) × SU(2)M4 × U(1)M4 × SU(2)R6D

U(1)R2D : JU(1)R2D = JU(1)M4 + J3R6D

2) Apply what done for F-theory on CY5, where the 7 branes wrap

X3 = M4 × P1 ⊂ B4

slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, FIELD CONTENT

6D Vector Multiplet:

A(6D)

µ

Tensor multiplet:

(t(6D), B(6D)

µν

)

Compactify on M4

  • Two ways of reading off the 2D multiplets from 6D

1) suppose the 4-Manifold is Kähler, then apply the following Topological Twist

SO(1, 5) × SU(2)R6D → SO(1, 1) × SU(2)M4 × U(1)M4 × SU(2)R6D

U(1)R2D : JU(1)R2D = JU(1)M4 + J3R6D

2) Apply what done for F-theory on CY5, where the 7 branes wrap

X3 = M4 × P1 ⊂ B4

V(0,0) ∈ H0

¯ ∂(M4, OM4)

D(0,1) ∈ H1

¯ ∂(M4, OM4)

Λ(0,2) ∈ H2

¯ ∂(M4, OM4)

CS Multiplet: Vector Multiplet: Fermi Multiplet:

We do not switch on any bundle on the 4-manifold

Right Moving Chiral Bosons: CS Multiplet:

∗H3 = −H3

B(2,0)

(t(2D)R, B

¯ i i)

RS Multiplet:

(t(2D)L, B(1,1))

Left Moving Chiral Bosons:

{

+ eventual Abelian Vectors

Ganor

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, 3 SECTORS

2h2,0 + 2 Right moving chiral currents

{ h1,1

Left moving chiral currents Chiral Bosons Sector, NLSM GLSM Sector

#(V ) − #(D) + #(Λ) = = dim(G)χ(M4, OM4)

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, 3 SECTORS

2h2,0 + 2 Right moving chiral currents

{ h1,1

Left moving chiral currents Chiral Bosons Sector, NLSM GLSM Sector

#(V ) − #(D) + #(Λ) = = dim(G)χ(M4, OM4)

L(2D) ⊃ µGS Z

M4

B(2,0) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D(0,1)]) + µGS Z

M4

B(1,1) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D†

(1,0)])

µGS Z

6D

B ∧ X 6D Green-Schwarz:

slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, 3 SECTORS

2h2,0 + 2 Right moving chiral currents

{ h1,1

Left moving chiral currents Chiral Bosons Sector, NLSM GLSM Sector

#(V ) − #(D) + #(Λ) = = dim(G)χ(M4, OM4)

L(2D) ⊃ µGS Z

M4

B(2,0) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D(0,1)]) + µGS Z

M4

B(1,1) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D†

(1,0)])

Gadde,Haghighat, Kim, Kim, Lockhart, Vafa; Kim, Kim , Park; Shimizu, Tachikawa; Del Zotto, Lockhart; Lawrie, Schäfer-Nameki, Weigand

Tensionless strings at the fixed point µGS Z

6D

B ∧ X 6D Green-Schwarz:

Extra Sectors: spacetime filling strings (D3 branes wrapping inside 7 branes)

L2D ⊃ Z

2D

B(2D) Z

M4

− ✓1 4TrF 2 + h∨

G

n ✓ c2(R) + p1(M4) 12 ◆◆

Reduction of 4D N=2 S-W/A-D/M-N

P1

= Nstring Z

2D

B(2D)

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • 3. DGLSM FROM 6D SCFT ON TENSOR BRANCH, 3 SECTORS

2h2,0 + 2 Right moving chiral currents

{ h1,1

Left moving chiral currents Chiral Bosons Sector, NLSM GLSM Sector

#(V ) − #(D) + #(Λ) = = dim(G)χ(M4, OM4)

L(2D) ⊃ µGS Z

M4

B(2,0) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D(0,1)]) + µGS Z

M4

B(1,1) ∧ Tr(F(2D) ∧ [D(0,1), D†

(1,0)])

Effective Strings

GLSM

Gadde,Haghighat, Kim, Kim, Lockhart, Vafa; Kim, Kim , Park; Shimizu, Tachikawa; Del Zotto, Lockhart; Lawrie, Schäfer-Nameki, Weigand

Tensionless strings at the fixed point µGS Z

6D

B ∧ X 6D Green-Schwarz:

Extra Sectors: spacetime filling strings (D3 branes wrapping inside 7 branes)

L2D ⊃ Z

2D

B(2D) Z

M4

− ✓1 4TrF 2 + h∨

G

n ✓ c2(R) + p1(M4) 12 ◆◆

Reduction of 4D N=2 S-W/A-D/M-N

P1

= Nstring Z

2D

B(2D)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Ohmori, Shimizu, Tachikawa + Yonekura; Heckman, Morrison, Rudelius, Vafa; Intriligator.

  • 4. ANOMALY POLYNOMIAL AND CENTRAL CHARGES, TWO COMPUTATIONS

I6D = αc2(R)2 + βc2(R)p1(T) + γp1(T)2 + δp2(T)

I2D = Z

M4

I6D(twist(0,2)) = kRR 2 c1(R(2D))2 − kgrav 24 p1(T)

  • 1. CFT

computation

kRR = (3p1(M4) + 6χ(M4))α − 2p1(M4)β kgrav = (6p1(M4) + 12χ(M4))β − 24p1(M4)(2γ + δ)

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Ohmori, Shimizu, Tachikawa + Yonekura; Heckman, Morrison, Rudelius, Vafa; Intriligator.

  • 4. ANOMALY POLYNOMIAL AND CENTRAL CHARGES, TWO COMPUTATIONS

I6D = αc2(R)2 + βc2(R)p1(T) + γp1(T)2 + δp2(T)

I2D = Z

M4

I6D(twist(0,2)) = kRR 2 c1(R(2D))2 − kgrav 24 p1(T)

  • 1. CFT

computation

2D chiral gamma operator

kRR = (3p1(M4) + 6χ(M4))α − 2p1(M4)β kgrav = (6p1(M4) + 12χ(M4))β − 24p1(M4)(2γ + δ)

2 .DGLSM computation

kRR = γ3R2

ferm(GLSM) × #(GLSM) + γ3R2 ferm(chiral bosons) × #(chiral bosons)

+ Nstringh∨

G

kgrav = γ3#(GLSM) + γ3#(chiral bosons) + Nstringh∨

G

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Ohmori, Shimizu, Tachikawa + Yonekura; Heckman, Morrison, Rudelius, Vafa; Intriligator.

  • 4. ANOMALY POLYNOMIAL AND CENTRAL CHARGES, TWO COMPUTATIONS

I6D = αc2(R)2 + βc2(R)p1(T) + γp1(T)2 + δp2(T)

I2D = Z

M4

I6D(twist(0,2)) = kRR 2 c1(R(2D))2 − kgrav 24 p1(T)

  • 1. CFT

computation

R-charges constrained by superpotential couplings 2D chiral gamma operator

kRR = (3p1(M4) + 6χ(M4))α − 2p1(M4)β kgrav = (6p1(M4) + 12χ(M4))β − 24p1(M4)(2γ + δ)

2 .DGLSM computation

kRR = γ3R2

ferm(GLSM) × #(GLSM) + γ3R2 ferm(chiral bosons) × #(chiral bosons)

+ Nstringh∨

G

kgrav = γ3#(GLSM) + γ3#(chiral bosons) + Nstringh∨

G

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Ohmori, Shimizu, Tachikawa + Yonekura; Heckman, Morrison, Rudelius, Vafa; Intriligator.

  • 4. ANOMALY POLYNOMIAL AND CENTRAL CHARGES, TWO COMPUTATIONS

I6D = αc2(R)2 + βc2(R)p1(T) + γp1(T)2 + δp2(T)

I2D = Z

M4

I6D(twist(0,2)) = kRR 2 c1(R(2D))2 − kgrav 24 p1(T)

  • 1. CFT

computation

R-charges constrained by superpotential couplings 2D chiral gamma operator

kRR = (3p1(M4) + 6χ(M4))α − 2p1(M4)β kgrav = (6p1(M4) + 12χ(M4))β − 24p1(M4)(2γ + δ)

Aharony, Tachikawa; Shapere, Tachikawa

2 .DGLSM computation

kRR = γ3R2

ferm(GLSM) × #(GLSM) + γ3R2 ferm(chiral bosons) × #(chiral bosons)

+ Nstringh∨

G

kgrav = γ3#(GLSM) + γ3#(chiral bosons) + Nstringh∨

G

Reduction of the 4D SW/AD/MN N=2 theory on P1

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Ohmori, Shimizu, Tachikawa + Yonekura; Heckman, Morrison, Rudelius, Vafa; Intriligator.

  • 4. ANOMALY POLYNOMIAL AND CENTRAL CHARGES, TWO COMPUTATIONS

I6D = αc2(R)2 + βc2(R)p1(T) + γp1(T)2 + δp2(T)

I2D = Z

M4

I6D(twist(0,2)) = kRR 2 c1(R(2D))2 − kgrav 24 p1(T)

  • 1. CFT

computation

R-charges constrained by superpotential couplings 2D chiral gamma operator

Computations Match: Evidence that the two Theories are at Finite Distance in the Target Space Metric

kRR = (3p1(M4) + 6χ(M4))α − 2p1(M4)β kgrav = (6p1(M4) + 12χ(M4))β − 24p1(M4)(2γ + δ)

Aharony, Tachikawa; Shapere, Tachikawa

2 .DGLSM computation

kRR = γ3R2

ferm(GLSM) × #(GLSM) + γ3R2 ferm(chiral bosons) × #(chiral bosons)

+ Nstringh∨

G

kgrav = γ3#(GLSM) + γ3#(chiral bosons) + Nstringh∨

G

Reduction of the 4D SW/AD/MN N=2 theory on P1

slide-62
SLIDE 62

WHAT WE HAVE DONE AND WHAT’S NEXT

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

▸ Tools for constructing 2D (0,2) Theories; ▸ Novel example of 2D SCFTs with dynamic couplings; ▸ UV completion of super critical string theories; ▸ Extending this method to a larger class of 6D SCFTs; ▸ Add defects on the four-manifold.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

AND FINALLY…

THANKS FOR LISTENING!