formal specification and verification
play

Formal Specification and Verification Formal specification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Formal Specification and Verification Formal specification Temporal logic 12.06.2012 Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans e-mail: sofronie@uni-koblenz.de 1 Formal specification Specification for program/system Specification for


  1. Formal Specification and Verification – Formal specification – Temporal logic 12.06.2012 Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans e-mail: sofronie@uni-koblenz.de 1

  2. Formal specification • Specification for program/system • Specification for properties of program/system Verification tasks: Check that the specification of the program/system has the required properties. 2

  3. Formal specification • Specification languages for describing programs/processes/systems Model based specification transition systems, abstract state machines, timed automata last time Axiom-based specification algebraic specification last time Declarative specifications logic based languages (Prolog) functional languages, λ -calculus (Scheme, Haskell, OCaml, ...) rewriting systems (very close to algebraic specification): ELAN, SPIKE, ... • Specification languages for properties of programs/processes/systems Temporal logic 3

  4. More complex specifications and specification languages • Languages for describing various processes • Languages based on Set theory (OZ, B) • Languages for describing durations • Complex languages 4

  5. CSP Communicating Sequential Processes, or CSP, is a language for describing processes and patterns of interaction between them. It is supported by an elegant, mathematical theory, a set of proof tools, and an extensive literature. 5

  6. CSP Communicating Sequential Processes, or CSP, is a language for describing processes and patterns of interaction between them. It is supported by an elegant, mathematical theory, a set of proof tools, and an extensive literature. • Each process: transition system • Operations on processes: sequential, parallel composition efects on states 6

  7. CSP General idea: Given: • Set of event names • Process: behaviour pattern of an object (insofar as it can be described in terms of the limited set of events selected as its alphabet) 7

  8. CSP Example: Events: insert-coin, get-sprite, get-beer 8

  9. CSP Prefix: P = a → Q ( a then Q ) where a is an event and Q a process After event a , process P behaves like process Q 9

  10. CSP: Example A simple vending machine which consumes one coin before breaking ( insert - coin → STOP ) 10

  11. CSP: Example A simple vending machine that successfully serves two customers before breaking ( insert - coint → ( get - sprite → ( insert - coin → ( get - beer → STOP )))) 11

  12. CSP Example: (recursive definitions) Consider the simplest possible everlasting object, a clock which never does anything but tick (the act of winding is deliberately ignored) Events ( CLOCK ) = { tick } Consider next an object that behaves exactly like the clock, except that it first emits a single tick ( tick → CLOCK ) The behaviour of this object is indistinguishable from that of the original clock. This reasoning leads to formulation of the equation CLOCK = ( tick → CLOCK ) This can be regarded as an implicit definition of the behaviour of the clock. 11

  13. Modular Specifications: CSP-OZ-DC (COD) COD [Hoenicke,Olderog’02] allows us to specify in a modular way: • the control flow of a system using Communicating Sequential Processes (CSP) • the state space and its change using Object-Z (OZ) • (dense) real-time constraints over durations of events using the Duration Calculus (DC) 12

  14. Interface } {z Example: Controller for line track (RBC) | } CSP part {z RBC method enter : [ s 1? : Segment ; t 0? : Train ; t 1? : Train ; t 2? : Train ] method leave : [ ls ? : Segment ; lt ? : Train ] (Leave) (Leave) (Enter) (Enter) local chan alloc , req , updPos , updSpd | } (Speed) c c = (( enter → main ) State 2 = (( alloc → State 3) CSP main 2 1 ( leave → main ) ( enter → State 2) ✷ ✷ Data classes ( updSpd → State 1)) ( leave → State 2)) ✷ ✷ c c State 1 = (( enter → State 1) State 3 = (( enter → State 3) {z (Request) (Position) ( leave → State 1) ( leave → State 3) ✷ ✷ ✷ ( req → State 2)) ✷ ( updPos → main )) SegmentData TrainData train : Segment → Train [Train on segment] segm : Train → Segment [Train segment] | 4 3 req : Segment → Z [Requested by train] next : Train → Train [Next train] (Allocation) alloc : Segment → Z [Allocated by train] spd : Train → R [Speed] pos : Train → R [Current position] } (Enter) (Enter) prev : Train → Train [Prev. train] (Leave) (Leave) Init A sd : SegmentData t : Train Γ train ( segm ( t )) = t OZ A td : TrainData t : Train Γ next ( prev ( t )) = t A t : Train Γ prev ( next ( t )) = t A A t : Train Γ tid ( t ) > 0 t : Train Γ0 ≤ pos ( t ) ≤ length ( segm ( t )) State and Init schema A A t 1, t 2 : Train | t 1 � = t 2Γ tid ( t 1) � = tid ( t 2) t : Train Γ0 ≤ spd ( t ) ≤ lmax ( segm ( t )) A A t : Train Γ alloc ( segm ( t )) = tid ( t ) s : Segment Γ prevs ( nexts ( s )) = s A A t : Train Γ alloc ( nexts ( segm ( t ))) = tid ( t ) s : Segment Γ nexts ( prevs ( s )) = s A ∨ length ( segm ( t )) − bd ( spd ( t )) > pos ( t ) s : Segment Γ sid ( s ) > 0 A A s : Segment Γ segm ( train ( s )) = s s : Segment Γ sid ( nexts ( s )) > sid ( s ) {z A s 1, s 2 : Segment | s 1 � = s 2Γ sid ( s 1) � = sid ( s 2) A s : Segment | s � = snil Γ length ( s ) > d + gmax · ∆ t A s : Segment | s � = snil Γ0 < lmax ( s ) ∧ lmax ( s ) ≤ gmax A s : Segment Γ lmax ( s ) ≥ lmax ( prevs ( s )) − decmax · ∆ t A s 1, s 2 : Segment Γ tid ( incoming ( s 1)) � = tid ( train ( s 2)) effect updSpd ∆( spd ) A t : Train | pos ( t ) < length ( segm ( t )) − d ∧ spd ( t ) − decmax · ∆ t > 0 Γmax { 0, spd ( t ) − decmax · ∆ t } ≤ spd ′ ( t ) ≤ lmax ( segm ( t )) A t : Train | pos ( t ) ≥ length ( segm ( t )) − d ∧ alloc ( nexts ( segm ( t ))) = tid ( t ) Γmax { 0, spd ( t ) − decmax · ∆ t } ≤ spd ′ ( t ) ≤ min { lmax ( segm ( t )), lmax ( nexts ( segm ( t ))) } A | t : Train | pos ( t ) ≥ length ( segm ( t )) − d ∧ ¬ alloc ( nexts ( segm ( t ))) = tid ( t ) Γ spd ′ ( t ) = max { 0, spd ( t ) − decmax · ∆ t } } . . . pdate rules 13 {z

  15. Example: Controller for line track (RBC) CSP part: specifies the processes and their interdependency. The RBC system passes repeatedly through four phases, modeled by events: (Leave) (Leave) (Enter) (Enter) (Speed) • updSpd (speed update) 2 1 • req (request update) (Request) (Position) • alloc (allocation update) 4 3 • updPos (position update) (Allocation) (Enter) (Enter) (Leave) (Leave) Between these events, trains may leave or enter the track (at specific segments), modeled by the events leave and enter. 14

  16. Example: Controller for line track (RBC) CSP part: specifies the processes and their interdependency. The RBC system passes repeatedly through four phases, modeled by events with corresponding COD schemata: CSP: − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − method enter : [ s 1? : Segment ; t 0? : Train ; t 1? : Train ; t 2? : Train ] method leave : [ ls ? : Segment ; lt ? : Train ] local chan alloc , req , updPos , updSpd main c State 1 c State 2 c State 3 c =(( updSpd → State 1) =(( req → State 2) =(( alloc → State 3) =(( updPos → main ) ✷ ( leave → main ) ✷ ( leave → State 1) ✷ ( leave → State 2) ✷ ( leave → State 3) ✷ ( enter → main )) ✷ ( enter → State 1)) ✷ ( enter → State 2)) ✷ ( enter → State 3)) − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − 15

  17. Example: Controller for line track (RBC) OZ part. Consists of data classes, axioms, the Init schema, update rules. 16

  18. Example: Controller for line track (RBC) OZ part. Consists of data classes, axioms, the Init schema, update rules. • 1. Data classes declare function symbols that can change their values during runs of the system Data structures: train: trains • 2-sorted pointers segm: segments SegmentData TrainData train : Segment → Train segm : Train → Segment [Train on segment] [Train segment] req : Segment → Z [Requested by train] next : Train → Train [Next train] alloc : Segment → Z spd : Train → R [Speed] [Allocated by train] pos : Train → R [Current position] prev : Train → Train [Prev. train] 9

  19. Example: Controller for line track (RBC) OZ part. Consists of data classes, axioms, the Init schema, update rules. • 1. Data classes declare function symbols that can change their values during runs of the system, and are used in the OZ part of the specification. • 2. Axioms: define properties of the data structures and system parameters which do not change • gmax : R (the global maximum speed), • decmax : R (the maximum deceleration of trains), • d : R (a safety distance between trains), • Properties of the data structures used to model trains/segments 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend