Forest Carbon Partnership Facility 4a. Introduction of ad hoc Technical Advisory Panels for PC14 R-PPs Fourteenth Meeting of the Participants Committee (PC14) Washington, DC March 19-21
R-PP Review Process • Continuing the established procedure: 1) Countries submit R-PP to FCPF/FMT 2) TAP Team reviews draft and revised R-PP • A TAP team of 5 to 8 individual experts having cross-disciplinary & regional expertise on forest policy and MRV • 2-3 in-country experts, including indigenous peoples expert • 2 co-leads who have experience reviewing other R-PPs 3) PC members volunteer to review revised R-PP
TAP and PC Timing and Process Final TAP country TAP Individual Conference review synthesis, reviews, using calls among and final R-PPs PARTICIPANTS standard TAP posted on FCPF COMMITTEE template and members web Final R-PP guidelines for R-PP Review COUNTRY Presentation both TAP and PC synthesis to PC reviewers Revised R-PP TAP PRESENTATION R-PP PC members review R-PP synthesis PC REVIEW review TAP PRESENTATION Consul discussion tants with country Review continues hired WB (Focusing on all 12 R-PP COMMENTS standards) Submission PRESENTATION 3
TAP process For PC 14 • 6 country R-PPs reviewed • 5 to 8 TAP reviews per country = 35 reviews: • 15 from REDD country experts • FMT hired about 30 TAP experts in July-August for PC 13 and PC14 • TAP held about 12 conference calls Charge to TAP Members • Be objective, consistent and fair. • Provide constructive recommendations to increase the R-PPs quality, and expert and independent advice on REDD. • Serve in individual capacity, not representing an organization. • Our thanks to the TAP members.
Honduras TAP Review 50 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework 45 5. Schedule and Budget 40 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals 35 3. Reference Level R-PP Quality 30 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 25 2c. Implementation Framework 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 20 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and Governance 15 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 10 1b. Information Sharing and Stakeholder Dialogue 5 1a. National Readiness Management Arrangements Five reviews since January 25, 2012 STANDARDS 0 5 1 2 3 4 5
PNG TAP Review 50 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework 45 5. Schedule and Budget 40 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 35 R-PP Quality 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals 30 3. Reference Level 25 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 20 2c. Implementation Framework 15 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 10 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and Governance 5 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Four reviews since August 2012 6
Surinam TAP Review 50 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework 45 5. Schedule and Budget 40 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 35 R-PP Quality 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals 30 3. Reference Level 25 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 20 2c. Implementation Framework 15 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 10 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and Governance 5 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Two reviews since December 19, 2012 7
Thailand TAP Review 50 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation 45 Framework 5. Schedule and Budget 40 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 35 R-PP Quality 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals 30 3. Reference Level 25 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 20 2c. Implementation Framework 15 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 10 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and Governance 5 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Two reviews since January 13, 2013; a record shorter review period 8
Vanuatu TAP Review 50 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework 45 5. Schedule and Budget 40 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 35 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals R-PP Quality 30 3. Reference Level 25 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 2c. Implementation Framework 20 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 15 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and 10 Governance 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 5 1b. Information Sharing and Stakeholder Dialogue 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Three reviews since September, 2012 9
Chile R-PP TAP Review 60 6. Program Monitoring & Evaluation Framework 50 5. Schedule and Budget 4b. Multiple Benefits, Impacts and Governance 40 R-PP Quality 4a. Monitoring – Emissions and Removals 3. Reference Level 30 2d. Social & Envir Impacts during Prep and Impl 2c. Implementation Framework 20 2b. REDD+ Strategy Options 2a. Land Use, Forest Law, Policy and 10 Governance 1c. Consultation and Participation Process 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 Three reviews since October, 2012
TAP review leaders at this meeting • Stephen Cobb (Lead, Vanuatu R-PPs) – Conservation and development consultant (UK) • Jayant Sathaye (co-lead, Thailand and PNG R-PPs) – Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (US and India) • D. James Baker (co-lead, Suriname R-PP) Global Carbon Measurement Program, Clinton Climate Initiative William J. Clinton Foundation (US) • Tomas Schlichter (co-lead, Chile and Honduras R-PPs) – Forest policy and economics expert (Argentina )
PC Review of R-PPs Since PC10, PC only reviews the revised R-PP. For PC14 R-PPs, 10 PC members reviewed 6 Country R-PPs (2 to 3 reviewers per R-PP; 1 to 3 R-PPs per member) Many thanks to PC reviewers and lead reviewers Country Lead Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3 PNG Australia Germany - Vanuatu Suriname USA - Thailand Switzerland Denmark Indonesia Suriname USA Colombia Indonesia European Honduras Commission Germany Canada Chile Colombia Switzerland USA
Schedule for R-PP Submission. Tentative R-PPs TBD, depending on outcomes of PC14 discussions Revised R-PP, and PC Meeting: Final TAP Reviews R-PP Draft Received by FMT Tentative Dates on Website April 15, 2013 (New submission) Mid- June June 29 – July 2 2013 April 25, 2013 (Resubmission) PC 15, Indonesia – FMT Strongly urges countries yet to submit R-PPs to use R-PP Template version 6 (April 20, 2012). The Template and Annexes in English, French and Spanish are available on FCPF website.
THANK YOU! www.forestcarbonpartnership.org 14
Recommend
More recommend
