for learning
play

for Learning: A framework for good teaching, a model for student - PDF document

5/6/2010 Universal Design for Learning: A framework for good teaching, a model for student success Craig Spooner, ACCESS Project Coordinator The ACCESS Project, Colorado State University Objectives What is UDL? Who benefits from it?


  1. 5/6/2010 Universal Design for Learning: A framework for good teaching, a model for student success Craig Spooner, ACCESS Project Coordinator The ACCESS Project, Colorado State University Objectives  What is UDL?  Who benefits from it?  How can it be implemented? BIG Question #1 Who are your students? 1

  2. 5/6/2010 Student diversity  Ethnicity & Culture  ESL/Native language  Nontraditional  Gender  Learning Styles  Disabilities Ethnicity & Culture* CSU Students CSU Faculty Minority 13.6% 12.8% International 3.5% 4.7% ESL / Native Language  Potential barriers to comprehension  For both students and instructors  Affects written and verbal communication 2

  3. 5/6/2010 What is your good name , sir? A. Full name B. Last name C. Nickname or pet name  I say there are 100 Krore stars in the sky. You say the stars number 10,000 Lakh .  Do we agree? Nontraditional Students Percentage of undergraduates with nontraditional characteristics: 1992 – 93 and 1999 – 2000 3

  4. 5/6/2010 Nontraditional Students  Highly motivated & Achievement oriented  Finances and family are two of the biggest concerns  Strong consumer orientation  Need flexible schedules  Integrate learning with life and work experiences  Want applicability to the real world  Prefer more active approaches to learning  Relatively independent  Lack of a cohort, “student life” experience Men & Women* 12,000 10,896 Men Women 10,308 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 1,905 1,766 2,000 408 130 0 Undergraduate Graduate Veterinary Medicine Learning Styles Visual 1. a) Visual-Linguistic (reading and writing) b) Visual-Spatial (graphs and pictures) Auditory (listening) 2. Kinesthetic (touching and moving) 3. 4

  5. 5/6/2010 Disabilities  Both short-term and long-term, apparent and non-apparent  Mobility Impairments  Blindness/Visual Impairments  Deafness/Hearing Impairments  Learning Disabilities  Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD/ADHD)  Autistic Spectrum Disabilities  Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)  Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Disabilities  National statistics:  11.3% of undergraduates report some type of disability*  Colorado State University  8% – 11% (ACCESS research, 2007-10)  Non-apparent disabilities are by far the largest proportion and growing  Only a small percentage seeks accommodations Universal Design for Learning “ Universal Design for Learning is a set of principles and techniques for teaching creating inclusive classroom instruction ” technology and accessible course materials. 5

  6. 5/6/2010 History of UDL  Universal Design (UD)  Accommodate the widest spectrum of users without the need for subsequent adaptation  Public buildings, city streets, television, kitchen utensils…  Universal Design for Learning (UDL)  Inclusive pedagogy  Applies to both teaching and technology UDL and T eaching 1. Represent information and concepts in multiple ways (and in a variety of formats). 2. Students are given multiple ways to express their comprehension and mastery of a topic. 3. Students engage with new ideas and information in multiple ways. Representation 6

  7. 5/6/2010 Representation  Ideas and information are represented in multiple ways and in a variety of formats  Lectures  Group activities  Hands-on exercises  Text + Graphics, Audio, Video  Usable electronic formats (e.g., Word, PDF, HTML) UDL and T echnology  Educational Videos  Course Materials  Lecture Presentation Systems  Course Management Systems What makes a document Universally Designed?  Searchability  Copy and Paste  Bookmarks or an Interactive TOC  Text to Speech capability  Accessibility 7

  8. 5/6/2010 UDL T ech T utorials  Microsoft Word  Styles and Headings  Images  PowerPoint  Adobe PDF  HTML  E-Text http://accessproject.colostate.edu Expression Expression  Students express comprehension and mastery in multiple ways  Oral presentation  Written essays  Projects/Portfolios/Journals  Performance  Multimedia (text/graphics/audio/video) 8

  9. 5/6/2010 Expression  Colin from our video  Student with Quadriplegia  Undergraduate in Landscape Architecture  Assignment: Create a 3D model  Physical model  Computerized model Engagement Engagement  Help students “engage” in multiple ways  Express your own enthusiasm!  Challenge students with meaningful, real-world assignments  Give prompt and instructive feedback on assignments  Classroom response systems (clickers)  Make yourself available to students during office hours in flexible formats 9

  10. 5/6/2010 Engagement  Professor from India has students video tape Q&A during office hours  Individual questions answered for everyone in the course  Video  Written explanation What’s so special about UDL? Represent 10

  11. 5/6/2010 BIG Question #2 What are Who are our your institution’s students? goals? CSU’s Strategic Goals  Goal 5: Access, Diversity, and Internationalization  Goal 6: Undergraduate Curriculum and Advising  6.2: Enhance programmatic accessibility for students with physical, learning and other disabilities  Goal 7: Active and Experiential Learning Opportunities  Goal 10: Student Engagement Outcomes (curricular and co-curricular) CSU’s Strategic Goals  Goal 9: Learning Outcomes  critical thinking  writing  Goal 8: Retention and Graduation  CSU’s first -year retention rate: 82%  6-year graduate rate: 63% 11

  12. 5/6/2010 BIG Question #3 Who are What are What’s your your CSU’s Instructional students? Goals? Philosophy? Instructional Philosophy  How do you conceptualize knowledge?  What is your role in the transmission of knowledge?  What constitutes student learning?  What learning objectives have you set for them, and how do you know when they’ve been achieved? Recommended Video http://www.cornell.edu/video/?VideoID=225 12

  13. 5/6/2010 Published Resources Burgstahler, S., & Cory, R. (2008). Universal design  in higher education from principles to practice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Rose, D. H., Harbour, W. S., Johnston, C. S., Daley, S.  G., & Abarbanell, L. (2006). Universal design for learning in postsecondary education: Reflections on principles and their application. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19(2), 135- 151. Thank you! ACCESS Website: accessproject.colostate.edu Craig Spooner craig.spooner@colostate.edu 970-491-0784 The ACCESS Project, Colorado State University Funded by U.S. Dept. of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Grant #P333A080026 13

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend