FirstEnergy Electric Rates and Savings Opportunities After January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

firstenergy electric rates and savings opportunities
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FirstEnergy Electric Rates and Savings Opportunities After January - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FirstEnergy Electric Rates and Savings Opportunities After January 1, 2009 Steve Ouellette Director, State Regulatory Affairs - Ohio FirstEnergy Corp. AEE Northern Region October 9, 2008 Disclaimer The information contained in this


slide-1
SLIDE 1

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

FirstEnergy Electric Rates and Savings Opportunities After January 1, 2009

Steve Ouellette

Director, State Regulatory Affairs - Ohio FirstEnergy Corp.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

2

Disclaimer

The information contained in this presentation material is intended to provide generally descriptive and summary information. Any conflict between the information contained in this material, or conveyed orally during the presentation, and the information provided as part of the Companies’ application in Case No. 08-935-EL-SSO is unintentional and the docketed material controls. The information contained herein is subject to change during the regulatory process.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

3

Ohio Legislation Background

Generation rate caps end on December 31, 2008 SB 221 responds to concerns about rising electricity

prices seen in states with expiring price caps

SB 221 became effective on July 31, 2008 Provides hybrid approach

– Electric utilities required to file an Electric Security Plan (ESP) that includes – at minimum – generation prices – Utilities have option to file a Market Rate Offer (MRO) where generation charges are determined through a Competitive Bid Process – PUCO to approve the plan – either ESP or MRO – that is expected to be more favorable in the aggregate for customers

slide-4
SLIDE 4

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

4

Where We Started: A Long History of Stable Rates

$ 90.44 $ 95.66 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.4 11.5 11.5 11.6 12.0 12.0 12.8 11.3 11.7 11.9 11.8 12.1 11.9 11.8 11.9

$60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2

Bill for 750 kWh Price (cents/kWh)

Ohio Edison

Bill for 750 kWh and Residential Price (cents per kWh)

$ 101.11 6 13.5 13.0 12.6 2009 2010 2011

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Cents per kWh

slide-5
SLIDE 5

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

5

Cost Increases – Last Five Years

The cost of the materials utilities must use to deliver the electricity provided customers has skyrocketed during the past five years.

*Sources: Handy-Whitman Index of Electric Utility Equipment; Bureau of Labor Statistics Producer Price Index for select components.

Energy Delivery Equipment Cost Increases Since 2003*

20% 44% 48% 50% 57% 84% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Treated Wood Poles Line Trucks Street Lighting Protective Conduit Regulators Power Transformers Overhead Wire Underground Cable Line Transformers

107% 109% 176%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

6

FE Response to SB 221

Two cases filed

(1) Electric Security Plan (ESP) (2) Market Rate Offer (MRO)

ESP:

– Comprehensive, covering generation, transmission and distribution – Predictable rates for 3-year program – Flexibility for PUCO in terms of customer impact – Additional non-price benefits for customers

MRO:

– Establishes market-based generation prices using an auction format

slide-7
SLIDE 7

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

7

MRO: Objectives

Secure competitively priced power supply for 2009 and

beyond

– Process design should encourage large number of bidders – Proper assignment of risk

Neutral financial position for utilities

– Utilities neither make nor lose money related to the provision of SSO Generation service

Mitigate wholesale market volatility

– Multiple solicitations

slide-8
SLIDE 8

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

8

MRO: Procurement Process

Descending clock bidding format Suppliers bid to provide energy, capacity, transmission service,

transmission ancillaries

Nominal 100 MW tranches Three year ladder; Multiple solicitations Slice of System Approach

Independent manager for competitive bidding process Affiliates may bid PUCO selects least cost bid winner(s) Least cost winning bid(s), once converted to retail rates,

becomes Companies' SSO

slide-9
SLIDE 9

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

9

ESP: Objectives

Price Stability Ensure adequate supply of electricity Maintain and improve the distribution system Promote economic development, job retention, energy

efficiency, and peak demand reduction

Resolve pending PUCO cases Flexibility for PUCO to manage prices

slide-10
SLIDE 10

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

10

ESP: Overview

Comprehensive plan

– 3-year pricing program for generation, transmission and distribution services not otherwise available – Generation pricing is lower-than-expected market prices – Established distribution pricing through 2013

Predictable rate patterns for customers Provides PUCO with flexibility

– >10% of generation price deferred for future recovery (2011-2022) – PUCO can reject 2011 pricing in favor of then-existing market

More favorable in the aggregate for customers than

the MRO – present value benefits >$1.3 billion over the plan

slide-11
SLIDE 11

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

11

ESP: Customer Benefits

Managed price increases

– 5.3% in 2009 – 4.0% in 2010 – 6.0% in 2011 Overall averages – differs by rate schedule and customer usage

All-electric customers Industrials High / low use residential customers

Favorable generation supply arrangement with FES

– FES commitment to add / retain 1,000 MW – Environmental remediation and reclamation up to $45 million

Commitment to Smart Grid study Performance-based rates tied to reliability Regulatory transition charges waived for CEI customers worth

$591 million

slide-12
SLIDE 12

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

12

ESP: Generation

Stable and predictable pricing throughout the course of the plan

– 7.5 ¢/kWh in 2009 (6.75 ¢/kWh with phase-in) – 8.0 ¢/kWh in 2010 (7.15 ¢/kWh with phase-in) – 8.5 ¢/kWh in 2011 (7.55 ¢/kWh with phase-in)

Seasonally and voltage adjusted Includes minimum default service provision and costs associated

with requirement for renewable energy resources

Expected average increase across all three companies:

5.99% 5.79% 2011 4.01% 4.01% 2010 5.32% 0.06% 2009 Total Bill Generation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

13

ESP: Transmission

Recovery through a reconcilable provision of all

transmission related costs

Includes ancillary services and congestion costs Reflects applicable FERC-approved charges or rates

incurred under MISO tariffs and agreements

slide-14
SLIDE 14

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

14

ESP: Distribution Rate Structure

Fewer tariffs Standardization across Ohio companies Annual distribution rate increase of $150M in the aggregate Delivery Service Improvement Rider:

– 0.2¢ / kWh – $115M annually

Maintain Distribution rates through 2013

slide-15
SLIDE 15

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

15

ESP: Service Reliability

At least $1 billion in energy delivery system improvements

through 2013

Delivery Service Improvement Rider

– Set reliability targets – Reliability performance linked to financial incentives – Annual adjustment up or down by 15% (+ / - 0.03 ¢ / kWh) – Asymmetrical band in favor of customers

slide-16
SLIDE 16

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

16

Proposed Rate Increases: 2009 – 2011

Percent Rate Increase by Company: 2009 - 2011 7.1% 5.2%

  • 14.9%

0.6% 5.1% 1.7% 6.7% 4.9% 8.7% Subtransmission 6.2% 4.4%

  • 10.3%

0.8% 4.8% 2.2% 6.2% 4.4% 5.3% GS – Primary 2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 2009 2011 2010 2009 TE CEI OE

slide-17
SLIDE 17

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

17

Savings Opportunities

Energy Efficiency Programs

– Customer energy efficiency and DSM investments up to $5M per year for 5 years – Customers can contribute their energy efficiency projects to the company – Eliminate charge for Energy Efficiency Rider

Economic Development & Growth

– Economic development and job retention investment up to $5M per year for 5 years – Reasonable Arrangement Rider (PUCO-approved special contracts) – Economic Development Rider – Unique contracts

slide-18
SLIDE 18

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

18

Savings Opportunities (continued)

Economic Development Rider

– Promotes gradualism, recognizes efficiency, mitigates overall bill impact to customers through credits and charges

Optional Load Response Rider

– Benefits customers who are able to quickly reduce their curtailable load during a critical period

Economic Load Response Rider

– Program designed to benefit customers who are able to quickly reduce their curtailable load in a critical period – Only available to existing interruptible customers

slide-19
SLIDE 19

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

19

Savings Opportunities (continued)

Reasonable Arrangements Rider

– Mechanism to administer certain tariff discounts for reasonable arrangements of commission proposed rules for customers committing to energy efficiency improvements

Business Distribution Credit

– As part of the Distribution Case filing, mitigates impact to specialty rates for General Service customers

slide-20
SLIDE 20

October 9, 2008 AEE Northern Region

20