fair value of liabilities how do we define closest asset
play

Fair Value of Liabilities How Do We Define Closest Asset Match? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fair Value of Liabilities How Do We Define Closest Asset Match? David Service & Jie Sun Fair Value Assets are OK Normally a market No market for long tail claims liabilities Approach requires the closest


  1. Fair Value of Liabilities – How Do We Define “Closest” Asset Match? David Service & Jie Sun

  2. Fair Value • Assets are OK – Normally a market • No market for long tail claims liabilities • Approach requires the “closest match” asset portfolio • Use the discount rate implied by those assets to discount liability cashflows

  3. Ultimate Surplus • Project asset and liability cashflows • When all liabilities extinguished what assets remain are the “ultimate surplus” • “Closest match” defined by reference to this ultimate surplus • Most important risk for insurance company is insolvency • Insolvency = negative ultimate surplus

  4. “Closest Match” • With stochastic cashflows the probability of insolvency is always non- zero [unless infinite initial asset amount] • As initial assets  probability of insolvency  • Two variables – Probability of insolvency – Initial asset amount • Need to fix one of these to produce a unique solution

  5. “Closest Match” – [2] Closest Match is The asset portfolio which, for a given probability of negative ultimate surplus, requires the lowest initial asset amount.

  6. Liabilities • Long tail outstanding claims • Runs off in 10 years • Quarterly time intervals • Experience run-off triangle shown in Appendix A

  7. Liability Model • Stochastic chain ladder (Renshaw & Verrall) • Modelled as a GLM • Log link function • Gamma error distribution • Linear predictor –  +  i +  i

  8. Asset Model • Asset Classes – 90 day bank bills – 10 year governemnt bonds – Australian equities : All Ordinaries Index • Jon Carter’s model – An expanded Wilkie type cascade structure – Fitted to the Australian markets

  9. Asset Portfolios • 100% cash • 100% bonds • 100% equities • Balanced – 30% cash, 30% bonds, 40% equities

  10. Probabilities of Insolvency Initial All Cash All Bond All Equity Balanced Asset Amount 50000 100.00% 100.00% 97.33% 100.00% 60000 99.99% 100.00% 87.57% 99.96% 70000 96.90% 100.00% 67.78% 95.68% 80000 50.08% 99.37% 46.15% 62.09% 90000 4.27% 78.44% 27.98% 20.16% 100000 0.06% 36.22% 16.99% 3.42% 110000 0.02% 12.06% 9.48% 0.33% 120000 0.03% 3.42% 4.88% 0.02% 130000 0.01% 0.83% 3.02% 0.05% 140000 0.01% 0.10% 1.50% 0.01% 150000 0.04% 0.03% 0.93% 0.03% 160000 0.05% 0.02% 0.43% 0.04% 170000 0.05% 0.04% 0.21% 0.03% 180000 0.01% 0.00% 0.16% 0.01%

  11. Probabilities of Insolvency 120.00% 100.00% 80.00% Cash Bonds 60.00% Equities Balanced 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 $'000

  12. Further Research • Different asset models • Different liability portfolios • Complete interactions between asset and liability models

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend