SLIDE 1
Factorization structures via the non-commutative Hilbert scheme of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Factorization structures via the non-commutative Hilbert scheme of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Factorization structures via the non-commutative Hilbert scheme of points in C 3 Emily Cliff University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign 17 March, 2018 Section 1 The question Let X be a smooth complex surface (e.g. C 2 ). Let X be a smooth
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Let X be a smooth complex surface (e.g. C2).
SLIDE 4
Let X be a smooth complex surface (e.g. C2). The Hilbert scheme of n points of X parametrizes 0-dimensional subschemes of X of length n.
SLIDE 5
Let X be a smooth complex surface (e.g. C2). The Hilbert scheme of n points of X parametrizes 0-dimensional subschemes of X of length n. Write HilbX = ⨆︁
n≥0 Hilbn X and
H = H*(HilbX) = ⨁︂
n≥0
H*(Hilbn
X).
.
SLIDE 6
It follows from the work of many people in geometry and in algebra that
SLIDE 7
It follows from the work of many people in geometry and in algebra that
1 H is an irreducible representation of the Heisenberg Lie
algebra hX. [Nakajima, Grojnowski]
SLIDE 8
It follows from the work of many people in geometry and in algebra that
1 H is an irreducible representation of the Heisenberg Lie
algebra hX. [Nakajima, Grojnowski]
2 H is isomorphic to the Heisenberg vertex algebra.
[Frenkel–Lepowski–Meurmann]
SLIDE 9
It follows from the work of many people in geometry and in algebra that
1 H is an irreducible representation of the Heisenberg Lie
algebra hX. [Nakajima, Grojnowski]
2 H is isomorphic to the Heisenberg vertex algebra.
[Frenkel–Lepowski–Meurmann]
3 On any smooth curve C, there is associated to HilbX the
Heisenberg chiral algebra. [Huang–Lepowski, Frenkel–Ben-Zvi]
SLIDE 10
It follows from the work of many people in geometry and in algebra that
1 H is an irreducible representation of the Heisenberg Lie
algebra hX. [Nakajima, Grojnowski]
2 H is isomorphic to the Heisenberg vertex algebra.
[Frenkel–Lepowski–Meurmann]
3 On any smooth curve C, there is associated to HilbX the
Heisenberg chiral algebra. [Huang–Lepowski, Frenkel–Ben-Zvi]
4 On any smooth curve C, there is a Heisenberg factorization
algebra ℋC. [Beilinson–Drinfeld, Francis–Gaitsgory]
SLIDE 11
Open problem: Given a smooth curve C and a smooth surface X, find a way to construct the factorization algebra ℋC directly from the geometry of X and C and the Hilbert scheme, without passing through all of the formal algebra.
SLIDE 12
Open problem: Given a smooth curve C and a smooth surface X, find a way to construct the factorization algebra ℋC directly from the geometry of X and C and the Hilbert scheme, without passing through all of the formal algebra. Strategy:
SLIDE 13
Open problem: Given a smooth curve C and a smooth surface X, find a way to construct the factorization algebra ℋC directly from the geometry of X and C and the Hilbert scheme, without passing through all of the formal algebra. Strategy:
1 Construct a factorization space over C whose fibres are built
from copies of the Hilbert scheme.
SLIDE 14
Open problem: Given a smooth curve C and a smooth surface X, find a way to construct the factorization algebra ℋC directly from the geometry of X and C and the Hilbert scheme, without passing through all of the formal algebra. Strategy:
1 Construct a factorization space over C whose fibres are built
from copies of the Hilbert scheme.
2 Linearize (e.g. taking by cohomology along the fibres) to
- btain a factorization algebra with fibres copies of H.
SLIDE 15
Section 2 The physics
SLIDE 16
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT
SLIDE 17
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math:
SLIDE 18
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X
SLIDE 19
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL
SLIDE 20
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C
SLIDE 21
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1):
SLIDE 22
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX
SLIDE 23
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra
SLIDE 24
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra Why?
SLIDE 25
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra Why? (2,0)-6d field theory
SLIDE 26
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra Why? (2,0)-6d field theory “Theory X”
SLIDE 27
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra Why? (2,0)-6d field theory “Theory X” X × C
SLIDE 28
The AGT correspondence
4d TFT 2d CFT In math: Moduli space of G-instantons on X Vertex algebra: 𝒳-algebra for gL X C G = U(1): HilbX Heisenberg vertex algebra Why? (2,0)-6d field theory “Theory X” X × C
Dimensional reduction
SLIDE 29
New strategy:
SLIDE 30
New strategy:
1 Build a factorization space over X × C.
SLIDE 31
New strategy:
1 Build a factorization space over X × C. 2 Use dimensional reduction to get a space over C.
SLIDE 32
New strategy:
1 Build a factorization space over X × C. 2 Use dimensional reduction to get a space over C. 3 Linearize.
SLIDE 33
Section 3 The math
SLIDE 34
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme.
SLIDE 35
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
SLIDE 36
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
Definition
A factorization space over Z is a space living over the Ran space, 𝒵 → Ran Z,
SLIDE 37
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
Definition
A factorization space over Z is a space living over the Ran space, 𝒵 → Ran Z, whose fibres 𝒵S are equipped with compatible factorization isomorphisms:
SLIDE 38
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
Definition
A factorization space over Z is a space living over the Ran space, 𝒵 → Ran Z, whose fibres 𝒵S are equipped with compatible factorization isomorphisms:
∙ Given some points {Si}n
i=1 ⊂ Ran Z
SLIDE 39
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
Definition
A factorization space over Z is a space living over the Ran space, 𝒵 → Ran Z, whose fibres 𝒵S are equipped with compatible factorization isomorphisms:
∙ Given some points {Si}n
i=1 ⊂ Ran Z such that, as subsets of
Z, the Si are pairwise disjoint,
SLIDE 40
Factorization spaces
Let Z be a separated scheme. The Ran space of Z parametrizes non-empty finite subsets S ⊂ Z.
Definition
A factorization space over Z is a space living over the Ran space, 𝒵 → Ran Z, whose fibres 𝒵S are equipped with compatible factorization isomorphisms:
∙ Given some points {Si}n
i=1 ⊂ Ran Z such that, as subsets of
Z, the Si are pairwise disjoint,we have F{Si} :
n
∏︂
i=1
𝒵Si
∼
− → 𝒵⊔Si.
SLIDE 41
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
SLIDE 42
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
In this case, we have Z = C, a smooth complex curve.
SLIDE 43
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
In this case, we have Z = C, a smooth complex curve. We define a space ℋ ilbX×C, whose fibre over S = {c1, . . . , cn} ∈ Ran C is given by
SLIDE 44
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
In this case, we have Z = C, a smooth complex curve. We define a space ℋ ilbX×C, whose fibre over S = {c1, . . . , cn} ∈ Ran C is given by ℋ ilbX×C,S = {ξ ∈ HilbX×C ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ Supp ξ ⊂
n
⨆︂
i=1
(X × {ci})} ∼ =
n
∏︂
i=1
ℋ ilbX×C,{ci}.
SLIDE 45
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
In this case, we have Z = C, a smooth complex curve. We define a space ℋ ilbX×C, whose fibre over S = {c1, . . . , cn} ∈ Ran C is given by ℋ ilbX×C,S = {ξ ∈ HilbX×C ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ Supp ξ ⊂
n
⨆︂
i=1
(X × {ci})} ∼ =
n
∏︂
i=1
ℋ ilbX×C,{ci}.
SLIDE 46
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C
SLIDE 47
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S
SLIDE 48
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S
SLIDE 49
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S
SLIDE 50
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S
SLIDE 51
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S
SLIDE 52
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S X × S
SLIDE 53
The Hilbert scheme factorization space
C S X × S
ξ
SLIDE 54
The Hilbert scheme as a critical locus
SLIDE 55
The Hilbert scheme as a critical locus
e.g. when X = C2, C = C3, we can write Hilbn
X×C as a critical
locus inside the non-commutative Hilbert scheme as follows:
SLIDE 56
Hilbn
C3 ∼
= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ (X, Y , Z, v) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C), [X, Y ] = [Y , Z] = [X, Z] = 0; v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ /GLn(C).
SLIDE 57
Hilbn
C3 ∼
= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ (X, Y , Z, v) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C), [X, Y ] = [Y , Z] = [X, Z] = 0; v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ /GLn(C). NCHilbn
C3 . .=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩(X, Y , Z, V ) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C); v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎬ ⎭ /GLn.
SLIDE 58
Hilbn
C3 ∼
= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ (X, Y , Z, v) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C), [X, Y ] = [Y , Z] = [X, Z] = 0; v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ /GLn(C). NCHilbn
C3 . .=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩(X, Y , Z, V ) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C); v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎬ ⎭ /GLn. W : NCHilbn
C3 → C
[X, Y , Z, v] ↦→ Tr(X, [Y , Z]).
SLIDE 59
Hilbn
C3 ∼
= ⎧ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ (X, Y , Z, v) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C), [X, Y ] = [Y , Z] = [X, Z] = 0; v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎪ ⎪ ⎬ ⎪ ⎪ ⎭ /GLn(C). NCHilbn
C3 . .=
⎧ ⎨ ⎩(X, Y , Z, V ) ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ ⃒ X, Y , Z ∈ Mn(C); v ∈ C3 a cyclic vector under X, Y , Z ⎫ ⎬ ⎭ /GLn. W : NCHilbn
C3 → C
[X, Y , Z, v] ↦→ Tr(X, [Y , Z]). Hilbn
C3 = Crit(W ).
SLIDE 60
Generalizing the factorization structure
For S ∈ Ran C, a point ξ = [X, Y , Z, v] ∈ HilbC3 lives in the fibre ℋ ilbC3,S whenever the eigenvalues of Z are contained in the set S ⊂ C.
SLIDE 61
Generalizing the factorization structure
For S ∈ Ran C, a point ξ = [X, Y , Z, v] ∈ HilbC3 lives in the fibre ℋ ilbC3,S whenever the eigenvalues of Z are contained in the set S ⊂ C. The factorization maps of Hilb are given by creating block diagonal matrices.
SLIDE 62
Generalizing the factorization structure
For S ∈ Ran C, a point ξ = [X, Y , Z, v] ∈ HilbC3 lives in the fibre ℋ ilbC3,S whenever the eigenvalues of Z are contained in the set S ⊂ C. The factorization maps of Hilb are given by creating block diagonal matrices.
Definition
We define a space 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3
SLIDE 63
Generalizing the factorization structure
For S ∈ Ran C, a point ξ = [X, Y , Z, v] ∈ HilbC3 lives in the fibre ℋ ilbC3,S whenever the eigenvalues of Z are contained in the set S ⊂ C. The factorization maps of Hilb are given by creating block diagonal matrices.
Definition
We define a space 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3 whose fibre over S ∈ Ran C consists
- f those points [X, Y , Z, v] ∈ NCHilbC3 such that the eigenvalues
- f Z are contained in the set S.
SLIDE 64
Remark: In general, if we start with two points [X1, Y1, Z1, v1], [X2, Y2, Z2, v2], there is no reason to hope that the data [︃X1 X2 ]︃ , [︃Y1 Y2 ]︃ , [︃Z1 Z2 ]︃ , [︃v1 v2 ]︃ , will again be stable.
SLIDE 65
Remark: In general, if we start with two points [X1, Y1, Z1, v1], [X2, Y2, Z2, v2], there is no reason to hope that the data [︃X1 X2 ]︃ , [︃Y1 Y2 ]︃ , [︃Z1 Z2 ]︃ , [︃v1 v2 ]︃ , will again be stable. However, in the case that the eigenvalues of Z1 and Z2 are distinct, stability is ensured.
SLIDE 66
Remark: In general, if we start with two points [X1, Y1, Z1, v1], [X2, Y2, Z2, v2], there is no reason to hope that the data [︃X1 X2 ]︃ , [︃Y1 Y2 ]︃ , [︃Z1 Z2 ]︃ , [︃v1 v2 ]︃ , will again be stable. However, in the case that the eigenvalues of Z1 and Z2 are distinct, stability is ensured. This gives us factorization maps F NC
{Si} : n
∏︂
i=1
𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3,Si → 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3,⊔Si.
SLIDE 67
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
SLIDE 68
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
∙ The maps F NC are closed embeddings, not isomorphisms.
SLIDE 69
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
∙ The maps F NC are closed embeddings, not isomorphisms. ∙ The factorization space ℋ
ilbC3 can be realized as a critical locus in 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3.
SLIDE 70
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
∙ The maps F NC are closed embeddings, not isomorphisms. ∙ The factorization space ℋ
ilbC3 can be realized as a critical locus in 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3.
∙ Over this critical locus, F NC restrict to the factorization
isomorphisms.
SLIDE 71
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
∙ The maps F NC are closed embeddings, not isomorphisms. ∙ The factorization space ℋ
ilbC3 can be realized as a critical locus in 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3.
∙ Over this critical locus, F NC restrict to the factorization
isomorphisms.
∙ We have a perverse sheaf 𝒬𝒲 of vanishing cycles on ℋ
ilbC3, a candidate for linearizing the factorization space to get a factorization algebra on C = C.
SLIDE 72
Results (jt. with Itziar Ochoa)
∙ The maps F NC are closed embeddings, not isomorphisms. ∙ The factorization space ℋ
ilbC3 can be realized as a critical locus in 𝒪𝒟ℋ ilbC3.
∙ Over this critical locus, F NC restrict to the factorization
isomorphisms.
∙ We have a perverse sheaf 𝒬𝒲 of vanishing cycles on ℋ
ilbC3, a candidate for linearizing the factorization space to get a factorization algebra on C = C. Work in progress: Is this sheaf compatible with the factorization structure on ℋ ilbC3?
SLIDE 73