Examples, Developments & Future Trends of Simulation in the Oil - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

examples developments future
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Examples, Developments & Future Trends of Simulation in the Oil - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Examples, Developments & Future Trends of Simulation in the Oil & Gas Industry Alex Read & David Fielding March 17 th 2014 Overview Application Areas for CFD within O&G Drivers for increased use of CFD Technology improvements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Examples, Developments & Future Trends of Simulation in the Oil & Gas Industry

Alex Read & David Fielding March 17th 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Application Areas for CFD within O&G Drivers for increased use of CFD Technology improvements Application examples Summary

Overview

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Application areas

Upstream Subsurface Flow Assurance & Subsea Process & Separation Marine & Offshore Midstream Downstream

Safety

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Safety

– Post-Macondo

New Frontiers

– Deepwater, Unconventionals, HPHT, etc. – Analysis Led Design

Technology – Software & Hardware

– Applications Technically & Economically Viable – Example: Virtual Wave Basin – Realism: New Emulsion / Non-Newtonian models – Efficiency: EOM – Multi-physics/disciplinary/fidelity

Bottom Line: Partnership is Key

Drivers for Expansion in Use of Simulation & CFD

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Non-Newtonian fluids in STAR-CCM+

Time Independent Behavior (no-memory fluids, generalized Newtonian modelling approach) Time Dependent Behavior (memory fluids) Purely viscous Thixotropics Rheopectics Viscoelastics

Reversible

  • Cross
  • Carreau-Yasuda
  • Linear
  • Non-linear

Key: Green = current capability in STAR-CCM+ Amber = current capability, application dependent Blue = under development

No Yield Stress Fluids

  • Newtonian
  • Ostwald-De

Waele (Power Law)

  • Carreau-

Yasuda

  • Cross

generalized non-Newtonian models

Yield Stress Fluids

  • Bingham
  • Herschel-

Bulkley

Realism: Non-Newtonian Models

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Realism: Emulsion

Modeling the pressure drop in pipes with a two phase Eulerian model (with no relative viscosity model) results in a decrease in pressure drop with volume fraction, which is incorrect. With the new relative viscosity models we are able to predict increases in pressure drop with increasing dispersed phase volume fraction that agree well with experiment.

Crude oil A and seawater emulsion in horizontal pipe of diameter 2.21 cm, velocity of 0.44 m/s

“Pipe flow of water-in-crude oil emulsions: Effective viscosity, inversion point and droplet size distribution” Jose Plasencia, Bjørnar Pettersen and Ole Jørgen Nydala, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Volume 101, January 2013, Pages 35–43

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Efficiency: Euler Overlay Method

t = -17.33 s t = 0 s t = 1.16 s Solu lution ion domain main for 3D RANSE SE comp mput utati ation

  • n

Solu lution ion domain main for 2D D Eule ler r comp mput utation ation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Flow induced vibration using STAR CCM+

cs #5 cs #4 cs #2 Def.: U (x200); Field: VM stress

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Thermal analysis example using STAR CCM+

Minimum fluid temperature Hydrate temperature Time Required cooldown time Temperature

CAD MODEL INSULATION EXPOSED STEEL

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Multiphase separation example

A range of multiphase models can be used to analyse separation performance VOF (volume of fluid) model can be used to analyse distribution

  • f phases and bulk fluid flow

– This can identify maldistribution into inlet devices and poor use of vessel volume

Lagrangian droplet tracking can evaluate the transport of liquid droplets in the gas space or gas bubbles within liquids

– Cut off sizes (smallest droplets being taken out of wrong outlets) can be determined

Eulerian analysis can be used in certain cases e.g. gas induced floatation separation vessels where high concentrations of gas bubbles will exist

– Impact of gas bubble jet on flow in vessel can be accounted for

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Multiphase separation example – VOF model

Multiphase flow entering inlet device and in vessel

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Multiphase separation example – Lagrangian model

Trajectories of 10 µm diameter oil droplets

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multiphase separation example – Lagrangian model

Trajectories of 300 µm diameter oil droplets

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Multiphase separation example – Eulerian model

Contours of gas bubble concentration Contours of velocity magnitude and vectors

100% WATER 100% GAS

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The following slides will provide an example of erosion analysis using STAR CCM+ Upstream bends in this example will have significant influence

  • n the distribution of sand and therefore the erosion at critical

sections CFD provides a method of assessing the erosion that will take into account the sand distribution through the progression of the pipework For high erosion rates, as surfaces become eroded the subsequent rate of erosion may change

– For example sharp edges may quickly become smoothed after which the rate of erosion reduces

Mesh morphing techniques are used in this analysis to evaluate the effects that the change in shape will have on the erosion rate over time

Erosion modelling example

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Erosion modelling example - Geometry

COMPUTATIONAL MODEL OF FLUID REGION

MAGNITUDE AND LOCATION OF EROSION AT REDUCER WILL BE HIGHLY INFLUENCED BY PROXIMITY OF BENDS UPSTREAM

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Directed mesher is used to provide hexahedral mesh, largely aligned with the flow direction with refinement at the walls The carrier phase, hydrocarbon gas, is then solved

Erosion modelling example - Mesh

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Erosion modelling example - Flow field solution

CONVERGED FLOW FIELD ON SECTION PLANE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The following models are used to analyse the sand phase

– Lagrangian multiphase – assumes sand concentrations <10% by volume (sand on sand collisions are ignored) – Drag force on particles – Schiller-Naumann (assumes spherical solid particles), and virtual mass (effects of displacing carrier phase mass) – Density of sand is specified for particle material – Restitution coefficients (normal and tangential) specified for walls – Haugen erosion model used (Ahlert, Nelson-Gilchrist and Oka also available) – Turbulent dispersion – accounting for turbulent fluctuations ‘randomising’ particle trajectories and producing greater number of trajectories to sample from

  • 10 parcel streams used per injection point (each cell face on model inlet) to

give 16800 tracks

– Two-way coupling between sand particles and carrier phase not required

  • Volume loading of sand is too low to significantly influence carrier phase

Erosion modelling example - Particle modelling

slide-20
SLIDE 20

A variety of erosion correlations exist within STAR CCM+

– Ahlert model: – Haugen: – Nelson-Gilchrist: – Oka:

Erosion modelling example - Erosion models

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Single solving step executed and trajectories of sand particles through carrier phase are calculated

Erosion modelling example - Particle tracks

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Contours of erosion can then be plotted on wall surfaces

Erosion modelling example - Erosion results

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The mesh morphing tool within STAR CCM+ can be used to modify the initial geometry based on the initial results A vector field function is created: the erosion rate (in mm per year) multiplied by face normal vector

Erosion modelling example - Morphing

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Analysis changed to transient, required for morphing Region > Motion specification set to Morphing Fluid > Boundary > Wall set to Displacement Morpher has the option of total or incremental

– Incremental option used to add displacement to existing displacement each time

Mesh morphing is carried out by

– Morphing mesh based on erosion rate – Re-evaluating flow field based on modified (morphed) geometry – Re-evaluating particle tracks and erosion rate – Repeating this process

Each cycle of this process represents the duration over which the erosion is predicted

– e.g. mesh morphed according to displacement in mm per year means each cycle represents one year

Erosion modelling example - Morphing

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Erosion modelling example - Morphing

EROSION RATE OVER TIME

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Erosion modelling example - Morphing

MESH MORPHING OVER TIME

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Use of CFD to analyse erosion can identify where high spots of erosion will occur Influence of sand distribution can be accounted for Morphing technique can be used to understand how erosion rate will change (in magnitude and location) over time Predictions of erosion magnitude are still difficult and appropriate factors of safety for design should be used according to models being applied

Erosion modelling example - Summary

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Slug catcher with OLGA coupling

INLET GAS OUTLETS ETS OIL OUTLETS TS SLUG CATCHER ER TANKS KS 45 m x x 3 m m D DIAME METER TER

(24 4 km km) (200 00 m)

(24 (24 km km) (200 m)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Is the combination of gas flow rate and pig geometry correct to move pig through pipe-line and up an incline? Will be pig deform as it travels round the pipe bend? What stresses will be caused in the pig? Overset mesh technique used to capture motion of pig Fluid analysis in STAR CCM+ coupled to structural analysis using Abaqus Two way coupling used in a transient simulation

Pigging assessment

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Pigging assessment

STAR-CCM+ Flow Solution using

  • verset mesh for the moving pig

Abaqus determines the pig motion and deflections

slide-31
SLIDE 31

CFD increasingly standard part of O&G engineering processes Drivers

– Safety – New Frontiers – Technology – Software & Hardware

CD-adapco working closely with Industry Partners Application examples

Summary