EGI Pay-for-Use Updates and Opportunities EGI Conf19 8 May 2019 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

egi pay for use
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EGI Pay-for-Use Updates and Opportunities EGI Conf19 8 May 2019 - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EGI: Advanced Computing for Research www.egi.eu @EGI_eInfra EGI Pay-for-Use Updates and Opportunities EGI Conf19 8 May 2019 - Amsterdam Sy Holsinger Senior Strategy and Policy Officer, EGI Foundation The work of the EGI Foundation is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.egi.eu @EGI_eInfra

The work of the EGI Foundation is partly funded by the European Commission under H2020 Framework Programme

EGI: Advanced Computing for Research

Updates and Opportunities

EGI Conf’19 – 8 May 2019 - Amsterdam

EGI Pay-for-Use

Senior Strategy and Policy Officer, EGI Foundation

Sy Holsinger

slide-2
SLIDE 2

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 2

  • Brief History
  • Results to date
  • Opportunities moving forward

Content

slide-3
SLIDE 3

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 3

Brief History

EGI and Pay-for-Use 2013 2014 2015 2016 2019

Proof of Concept

  • ~40 participants (30 Providers across 12 Countries)
  • Policy/legal analysis by country/provider
  • Pricing definition/publication

Policy Document

  • Initial thought analysis: benefits, risks, suggested actions

Tool Adaptation

  • GOCDB, Accounting Portal, e-GRANT

Formalization

  • Agreements, documentation
  • Formal Letters of Intent

Use cases

  • H2020 Projects, tenders, ESA brokering, training
slide-4
SLIDE 4

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 4

  • How to participate as a service provider in H2020 projects?

§ Project consortium member / beneficiary

  • Pro: visibility, clear responsibilities, delivery of tasks/activities
  • Con: not favored by coordinators when multiple providers are involved; provider selection

§ Linked Third Party (Section 4) to project beneficiary

  • Pro: minimizes number of consortium members, specified participants/effort/resources
  • Con: technical requirements not always known during proposal; need to identify providers

§ Contractor (to be named later during the life of the project)

  • Pro: flexibility of providers if technical requirements are not known during proposal phase
  • Con: justification/clear guidelines to convince reviewers, additional overhead to manage
  • How to manage external requests?

§ Matchmaking one-to-one relationships § Brokering and coordination for multi-provider scenarios § Defining/facilitating business and pricing models

Involving EGI Providers

H2020 Projects, External Requests

slide-5
SLIDE 5

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 5

Pay-for-Use Cases

H2020 Projects

Innovative Pilots Business Pilots

  • Contractor model
  • 10+2 Pilots
  • Core Services
  • €100k budget
  • €33k allocated to 5 EGI

Providers (6 pilots)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 6

Pay-for-Use Cases

H2020 Projects

  • Consortium member model
  • 6 initial business pilots
  • Need to onboard more
  • €100k budget
  • Still need to understand costs

(recovery only)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 7

Pay-for-Use Cases

Brokering External Requests

  • Pure pay-for-use model
  • €8k contract / 12 Months
  • 4 EGI Cloud Providers selected
  • SLA/OLAs in place
  • Data hub/DIAS benchmarking
slide-8
SLIDE 8

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 8

Pay-for-Use Cases

Monetizing services

  • Pure pay-for-use model
  • In-house courses
  • Open registration courses
  • Formal certification (APMG, ICO-Cert)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 9

  • Letter of Intent

§ EGI Provider statement of availability and willingness to provide pay-for-use services § Specification under what conditions (in/out country; R&D only; human only; any) § Providers need to be able to invoice EGI Foundation

  • Service Offers

§ Providers to respond to requests with pricing that includes both technical resources and amount of support

  • Selection criteria

§ Hasn’t been and not only about who is the cheapest, but selection criteria to be better documented (SLM procedure)

  • New P4U SLAs and OLAs templates

§ SLA: EGI Foundation and Customer § OLA: EGI Foundation and EGI Provider

  • Broker and coordination fees

§ e.g. 25% on top of compute costs to cover brokering and coordination effort (when not covered within a project) § Pricing model and naming to be better defined

Documentation

Agreements, Processes, Business Models

slide-10
SLIDE 10

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 10

COCA (Swiss)

Opportunities

Pricing Tools: Automation and Accounting

EGI Accounting Portal

slide-11
SLIDE 11

@EGI_eInfra www.egi.eu

07/05/2019 11

  • Understand that funding resources is an issue and want to create diverse
  • pportunities for re-distributing funds to EGI providers

§ H2020 projects; brokering external requests; commercializing services § Projects helped to test/improve processes (i.e. NextGEOSS) § More requests are coming

  • Would like to expand the provider pool, only a handful are taking advantage

§ 6 usual suspects: CESGA; CESNET; IFCA; INFN-Bari; IISAS; 100%IT

  • Want to better understand any blocking issues

§ Inability/willingness to commit, just didn’t know, need support?

  • Need to reduce overhead (time) and increase transparency

§ Clearer price listings, better defined procedures and guidelines

Opportunities

Moving forward

slide-12
SLIDE 12

This work by the EGI Foundation is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Questions? Thank you for your attention.

www.egi.eu @EGI_eInfra

EGI: Advanced Computing for Research

The work of the EGI Foundation is partly funded by the European Commission under H2020 Framework Programme