effectiveness of active learning based rcr workshop in
play

Effectiveness of Active Learning Based RCR Workshop in Malaysia De - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Effectiveness of Active Learning Based RCR Workshop in Malaysia De Ming Chau, PhD Senior Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia Member, Young Scientists Network Academy of Sciences The Malaysian RCR Educational Programme 2013 Conducted RCR


  1. Effectiveness of Active Learning ‐ Based RCR Workshop in Malaysia De ‐ Ming Chau, PhD Senior Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia Member, Young Scientists Network ‐ Academy of Sciences

  2. The Malaysian RCR Educational Programme 2013 Conducted RCR workshops • Lead by the Young Scientists Network in Established Malaysian RCR Malaysia 2015 Programme • Target all researchers in Malaysia • Conduct workshops around the country Published Malaysian RCR 2018 educational module Launching national survey 2019 on RCR

  3. Active Learning Pedagogy Workshops • Main RCR topics • Case studies, roleplay, peer teaching, etc. • Pre ‐ and post ‐ workshop survey

  4. Demographics Snapshot YEARS OF RESEARCH EXPERIENCE SINCE PHD More GENDER 6 to 10 than 10 35% 23% Male Missing 43% 2% Female 0 to 5 57% 40% AGE >40 31 ‐ 40 11% 64% missing 2% < 30 23%

  5. Does your university provide clear guidance on how to report Attended RCR related course? suspicious research conduct? Missing Data 8% Yes No Yes 34% 66% No 29% 63%

  6. RCR Knowledge Preworkshop survey Postworkshop survey 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 Score (full score=2) 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 In your own words, List as many topics Describe DURC Explain Falsification. Explain fabrication. Explain plagiarism. describe RCR. as you can think of that are related to RCR.

  7. When you witness your colleague committing research misconduct, what would you do? Changes in attitude 70 60 Percentage % 50 40 Preworkshop survey 30 20 Postworkshop survey 10 0 Not doing anything Advice the colleague Report the incidence who commited to the responsible research misconduct unit

  8. But.. Does gender, age or years of research experience affect how they would behave?

  9. When you witness your colleague committing research misconduct, what would you do? 60 50 40 Not doing anything Percentage 30 Advice the colleague who committed research 20 misconduct Report the incidence to the 10 responsible unit 0 <= 5 years 6 ‐ 10 years > 10 years Years of Research Experience Experienced researchers (> 10 years) were less likely to take action

  10. Refining our research • Codified each participant; researchers are blinded • Track the changes of individual participant pre and post ‐ workshop • Expand knowledge and attitude section • Contact previous workshop participants to assess long ‐ term effect

  11. Conclusion • RCR education is lacking Malaysia • Workshop is able to shift knowledge and attitude • Participants feedback: “The mixtures of talks and activities made it fun” “I really enjoyed the openness of all the discussions” “Not boring”

  12. Acknowledgement • Young Scientists Network ‐ Academy of Sciences Malaysia • Academy of Sciences Malaysia • Professor Abhi Veerakumarasivam, Sunway University • Dr. Chai Lay Ching, Universiti of Malaya • US. National Academies

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend