Economic Outlook Harrisonburg-Rockingham Chamber of Commerce April - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

economic outlook
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economic Outlook Harrisonburg-Rockingham Chamber of Commerce April - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Economic Outlook Harrisonburg-Rockingham Chamber of Commerce April 1, 2020 Renee Haltom Vice President and Regional Executive The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author. They do not represent an official position of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Renee Haltom Vice President and Regional Executive

Economic Outlook

Harrisonburg-Rockingham Chamber of Commerce

April 1, 2020

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the

  • author. They do not represent an official position of the

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What is the story?

Where were we pre-virus?

  • Economic growth looked solid and that was expected to

continue

– Strengths: Consumer spending, residential investment, labor – Weaker: Business investment, and manufacturing was soft but rebounding

Enter COVID-19. How bad could it get for the economy? The role for economic policy We need your help

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

National Economy, Pre COVID-19

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The economy was chugging along

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve Board /Haver Analytics

Real Gross Domestic Product

  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

2 4 6 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 % Change, SAAR

Q4: 2019 US: 2.1%

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Economy was adding jobs consistently

Monthly Change February: 273 January: 273 December: 184

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics/Haver Analytics

Total Nonfarm Employment

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Unemployment Rate (Percent)

So not surprisingly, unemployment falling

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Board of Governors/Haver Analytics

February 2020 US: 3.5%

Civilian Unemployment Rate

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

But business investment had been soft

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis via Haver Analytics

  • 30
  • 25
  • 20
  • 15
  • 10
  • 5

5 10 15 20 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 % Change, SAAR

Q4: 2019

  • 2.3%

Non-residential fixed investment

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Manufacturing had been soft but rebounding

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond/Institute of Supply Management/Haver Analytics 8

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

  • 40
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30 40 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

3

  • m
  • n

t h a v e r a g e

Manufacturing Composite Index (Left Axis) ISM Manufacturing (Right Axis)

Richmond Manufacturing Survey and ISM Manufacturing Survey

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Enter COVID-19

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

COVID-19: Economic effects

Direct impact

  • It’s a direct supply shock: Temporary reduction in labor
  • It’s a direct demand shock: For nondurables (e.g. travel, tourism,

restaurants)

  • Knock-on demand effects: Still highly uncertain

– Drops in some cases: Furloughed workers may consume less; certain businesses need fewer supplies; sentiment causes people to hold back big purchases

  • To what extent will this demand come back later?

– Clucky shifts in others: Some declines “cancel out”, but maybe imperfectly

  • Restaurant supply chains not easily convertible to grocery
  • Larger online retailers struggling to staff warehouses and find transportation
  • Conditions continue to change rapidly

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How bad could it get?

Let’s try to scale things. For employment:

  • There are 150m workers in the economy. 1/5 of them are in

sectors that are pretty directly hit: – 12m retail workers outside grocery stores (8% of total) – 12m food services – e.g. restaurants (8% of total) – 2m accommodation services – e.g. hotels (1.3% of total) – 2.5m arts, entertainment, recreation – (1.6% of total) We are seeing this in initial claims for unemployment insurance

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

United States initial claims for UI

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 United States Unemployment Insurance Initial Claims United States

February 15: 215,000 February 22: 220,000 February 29: 217,000 March 7: 211,000 March 14: 282,000 March 21: 3,283,000 Thousands

That’s not a chart border… it’s last week’s reading

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Virginia initial claims for UI

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Virginia Unemployment Insurance Initial Claims Virginia

February 15: 2693 February 22: 2079 February 29: 3267 March 7: 2527 March 14: 2883 March 21: 46885

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How bad could it get?

Let’s try to scale things. For consumption:

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

How bad could it get?

Let’s try to scale things. For consumption:

  • Why focus on consumption? It’s 70% of GDP
  • 55% of consumption (housing and utilities, medical services)

might see more limited impact

– Spending may even shift toward here (e.g. households spend more time at home, use more electricity, do home renovations, etc.)

  • 25% of consumption will suffer more direct hits

– Transportation – Recreation and food services – Food services and accommodations

  • If that 25% falls by 2/3, total consumption will fall by 15%  hit

to GDP in the neighborhood of 10%

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What should economic policy do?

3 guiding ideas:

  • Shock is blunt (affects everybody) and fairly uncomplicated.
  • Pandemic timing broadly known: initial spike then slow recede.
  • Economy’s ability to produce has not fundamentally changed.

That said, three caveats could change that: – “Organizational capital” (business-specific know-how) has become more important in our economy. Longer shock potentially more of that lost – Workers may lose attachment to previous place of employment – Workers need something to return to  businesses need to stay open or re-open

Those three caveats suggest places for economic policy to focus.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Three policy “lanes” open now

Health policy (most important by far)

  • Goal: bend the curve and get beyond the inflection point
  • Economic policies are then left to address economic effects of

health response (e.g. social distancing) Fiscal policy: can be targeted

  • Prevent needless bankruptcies/breaks in economic relationships
  • Support directly to households

Monetary policy: supports economy more broadly

  • Reduced interest rates to effectively zero
  • Help keep financial markets functioning by providing liquidity (i.e.

lending)

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A note on small businesses

Helping small businesses has been a huge focus of this crisis

  • There are some 31m of them and they are 47% of employment
  • Many in the sectors hit hardest
  • Many are probably on this call

Policy support

  • The big policy is the just-passed CARE Act, which (among many

things) provides $349b to cover 8 weeks’ cash flow for a small business, which can be forgiven to the extent they keep employees and don’t cut salaries

– Banks extend these funds, which the SBA guarantees

  • By comparison, in FY2019 the SBA guaranteed $28b in lending

through 63k loans. So this is big.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Parting thoughts

  • Luckily, we came into this with a solid economy and a very

healthy banking system

  • What’s next depends largely on health policy

– When will it be safe to come back? – How do we come back? Phased approach, protocols?

What I’m watching – where I need to hear from you:

– Are economic policies hitting as intended? Where are gaps? – How are businesses like you planning – how do you bring back customers? To what extent can you make up revenue? – What unexpected things will gum up the recovery?

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Please join our business surveys!

Each month we ask for feedback from business executives located in our District. Respondents provide information on current business activity and expected changes for the next six months. These data paint a picture of industry trends and help the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to be better informed about business conditions in our

  • District. (Washington, D.C., Maryland, W.Virginia,

Virginia, N. Carolina, and S.Carolina) Your business is an integral part of our Fifth District community and we hope you will contribute. If you would like to sign up please contact: Roisin.McCord@rich.frb.org 804-697-8702 View our survey data and reports online: https://www.richmondfed.org/research/regional_ec

  • nomy/surveys_of_business_conditions

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author. They do not represent an official position of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond or the Federal Reserve System.

… and thank you! Questions? Renee.Haltom@rich.frb.org

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Addendum

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary of fiscal policy response

3/6: $8.3b to strengthen healthcare response 3/13: $100b for expanded sick pay 3/27: $2t CARE Act

  • Relief for individual, families, and businesses
  • Small business support
  • Assistance to severely distressed sectors
  • Health sector support

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Summary of monetary policy response

  • Cut interest rates to effectively zero
  • Encouraged banks to lend
  • Extended 2008-era credit facilities to improve liquidity and

functioning in certain asset markets

– Including two new facilities to support credit to large firms and improve liquidity for secondary corporate bonds – with Treasury covering losses – And extending existing facilities to include municipalities

  • Purchases of treasuries and MBS that are open ended in

size

  • Coming soon: Credit facility aimed toward small

businesses

24