east sussex pension fund
play

East Sussex Pension Fund: Responsible Investment William Marshall - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

East Sussex Pension Fund: Responsible Investment William Marshall Paul Potter August 2016 Hymans Robertson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority Agenda Background Funds approach Key


  1. East Sussex Pension Fund: Responsible Investment • William Marshall • Paul Potter • August 2016 Hymans Robertson LLP is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority

  2. Agenda • Background • Fund’s approach • Key themes • Potential next steps 2

  3. What is responsible investment? Responsible investment is an approach to investment that explicitly acknowledges the relevance to the investor of environmental, social and governance factors, and of the long-term health and stability of the market as a whole. It recognises that the generation of long-term sustainable returns is dependent on stable, well-functioning and well governed social, environmental and economic systems. UNPRI, What is responsible investment? “Responsible investment isn’t about changing the world; it’s about understanding how the world is changing and how companies will be affected” Jane Ambachtsheer, Mercer 3

  4. Ethical investment is different • Ethical Investment is an approach to investment that seeks to directly impose the beliefs of the investor on assets held through the imposition of exclusions or limitations. • The difference between Responsible Investment and Ethical Investment is the difference between “Value” and “Values” 4

  5. Material environmental, social and governance factors ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL GOVERNANCE Climate Change Stakeholder relations Board Structure Resource scarcity Supply Chains Accounting & Audit Water Availability Working Conditions Executive remuneration Greenhouse Gas emissions Diversity issues Bribery & Corruption Pollution Health & Safety Shareholder rights Energy efficiency Population Growth Transparency Differentiate between systemic and operational risks 5

  6. ESG - Timeframe matters Systemic risks: Potential long term impact, but can be influenced by shorter term changes Operational risks: Potential shorter-term impact 6

  7. RI in equities Can be divided into two main strands: Sustainable Investment Governance & Stewardship • • Understanding the level of ESG Investors, as owners of the underlying analysis carried out by managers, and businesses, have a responsibility to the integration of this analysis into the act as effective stewards of these research/portfolio construction process companies; clients, as ultimate owners, should accordingly monitor • More relevant for certain investing managers’ behaviour styles than others – the more • concentrated and long-term/lower Applicable to all equity managers, turnover the approach, the more although managers with bigger relevant ESG analysis becomes shareholdings and influence (such as (doesn’t apply to passive) passive managers) arguably have a greater responsibility 7

  8. RI in fixed income • Ethical investing – mainly driven by negative screens (alcohol, armaments etc.) • Bond investors no voting rights so arguably less impact on governance and stewardship than equity investors however engagement does occur • Role is protecting client’s interests as creditors – covenant change, input to re-structuring • Bond managers responsible investment policies generally have evolved from their equity model • Sustainable investing – driven by positive screens focussing on products/services with positive social benefit e.g. social housing • Key is knowing the level of E, S and G taken into account in the decision making process – how much weight is applied to these factors? • Some managers assign an ‘ESG score’ as input to credit analysis, others adopt a more informational approach 8

  9. RI in real estate • Property has a visible impact on the environment, consuming resources in both its construction and ongoing use • Legislation from 1 April 2018 impacting the ability to let property with an EPC rating of F or G • Responsible Property Investment can reduce the costs of occupation, thereby making buildings more attractive to potential tenants – Resource usage – Energy procurement – Waste reduction • Sustainability characteristics of a building/portfolio can be measured – Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) – Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) Responsible Property Investment document 9

  10. Myners Principle 5: Responsible ownership “Trustees should adopt, or ensure their investment managers adopt, the Institutional Shareholders’ Committee Statement of Principles on the responsibilities of shareholders and agents. A statement of the scheme’s policy on responsible ownership should be included in the Statement of Investment Principles. Trustees should report periodically to members on the discharge of such responsibilities .” 10

  11. Institutions for occupational retirement provision • Environmental, social and governance factors as referred to in the UN Principles for Responsible Investment are important for the investment policy and risk management systems of IORPs. Member States should require IORPs to explicitly disclose where these factors are considered in investment decisions and how they are part of their risk management system . • IORPs should, as part of their risk management system, produce a risk assessment for their activities relating to pensions. That risk assessment should also be made available to the competent authorities and should, where relevant, include, inter alia, risks related to climate change, use of resources, the environment, social risks, and risks related to the depreciation of assets due to regulatory change ('stranded assets'). Wording from 2016 IORPII 11

  12. Law Commission Report & Fiduciary Duty • “The most important distinction is between the factors relevant to increasing returns or reducing risk (financial factors) and those which are not (non- financial factors)” Test 1 - Trustees should have good reason to think that scheme members would share Financial Non-financial their concerns factors factors Test 2 - The decision should not involve a risk of significant financial detriment to the Fund 12

  13. Fund’s focus to date • Regularly considered by Pensions Committee – Last discussed at Q1 2016 Committee meeting; and – Annual strategy day • Agreed policy in place (SoIP) and Myners • Collective engagement: Fund a member of Local Authority Pension Fund Forum • Fund’s managers have signed up to UNPRI and UK Stewardship Code 13

  14. Fund focus going forward • Focus of today • Focus on Fund’s key objectives • Agree procedures and policies for future success Fund’s Regulations and Implementation Strategy objectives Beliefs 14

  15. Topical item: stranded assets 15

  16. 16 16

  17. How climate change could affect pension schemes Physical impacts (e.g. reduction in crop yields) and adaptation/ mitigation action impacts on Economic growth Carbon risk, physical impacts and litigation risk have a potential financial impact Climate Change Asset returns May result in lower spending Could impact positively on healthcare and impact on (technological change) human livelihoods or negatively (scarcity) Resource constraint Inflation Liabilities Policy action (e.g. carbon budgets) Supply/demand imbalances creates and physical feedbacks (e.g. water scarcity) give rise to Mortality/ Morbidity Impact on human livelihoods Physical feedbacks may result in changes to 17

  18. In simple terms Natural Real Economy Financial Economy Environment 18

  19. COP21 • 21st Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Aimed to set a new international agreement on climate change to reduce carbon dioxide emissions (“CO2”) and keep global warming below 2° C • The agreement (not legally binding): – Target a temperature rise of below 2 ° C up to 2100 – Emissions should peak as soon as possible – All countries will aim to achieve carbon neutrality in the second half of this century – Framework to measure, monitor & verify carbon reduction to improve transparency – Countries will submit updated reduction plans every 5 years – $100bn per year from developed countries will be donated to support adaption and migration in least developed countries and small island developing states • Possible implications for investors: – Increased regulation - identification of vulnerable industries is important – Introduction of new government policies - e.g. new law in France for most asset owners to disclose their carbon footprint – Increased focus from media & potential for continued lobbying for divestment of fossil fuels 19

  20. ESG - Current issue: Carbon risk If we stay within the carbon budget, some fossil fuel reserves will have to stay in the ground and have no value: “Stranded assets” UK target to cut carbon emissions by at least 80% of 1990 levels by 2050. COP21 (Paris, December 2015): Limit temperature rise to 2% up to 2100. 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend