east africa geothermal energy facility
play

East Africa Geothermal Energy Facility GRMF East Africa Donors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

East Africa Geothermal Energy Facility GRMF East Africa Donors Coordination and Collaboration Meeting 14 June 2016 What is EAGER? Funde ded d by DFI FID Regional Technical Assistance programme running for 3.5 years from May


  1. East Africa Geothermal Energy Facility GRMF East Africa Donors’ Coordination and Collaboration Meeting – 14 June 2016

  2. What is EAGER? • Funde ded d by DFI FID • Regional Technical Assistance programme running for 3.5 years from May 2015 • GBP 6 million and covering 5 countries (Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda) • Seeks to cover gaps in Government role to support geothermal development by removing barriers and speeding progress No duplication with other donors o

  3. Key Attributes of EAGER • Flexibility xibility o Lookin ooking g at cur urren ent t issues ues not ot covere ered d by ot othe hers o Qu Quick k respon sponse, , wher here e possibl ssible • Large ge Pool l of Exper pertise tise o Able e to draw w on a wide de range ge of exper pertise tise: • Geoth otherma ermal techni nical cal; ; legal; ; re regulator ory; ; finance; ce; busin sines ess s stra rategy; egy; electrici ctricity ty markets ts and power plannin ing; g; tariffs fs and PPAs o Focus cus on deci cisi sion on sup uppor ort t and remo moving ving barrier iers s to progre ress ss o Repor orts on internat ernational ional exper perience ience

  4. People • DFID: ID: Gareth Martin (UK) • Pr Progra gramme mme Ma Manag ageme ement: nt: Adam Smith International • Team eam Lead ader: er: John Heath (UK) • Pr Progra gramme mme Ma Manag ager ers: s: o Laura Rizzotto (UK) o Matt Blythe (Nairobi)

  5. Work Programmes: Key Issues Emerging 1. Role 1. le of Geothe thermal mal in El Electricity ctricity Ma Mark rkets: ts: o Mark rket et Ris isks s for r Geoth eother erma mal o Power er Purcha chase e Agr greeme eements ts and N d Neg egotia iati tion on 2. Geothe 2. thermal mal Development lopment – Bu Busine ness ss Mo Models dels 3. 3. Regulat ulatory y Ma Mandat ates es an and Fram amewor orks ks

  6. Market Risks for Geothermal • To date the general assumption has been that there will always be demand for any additional power generation in East Africa • But this is changing…. • Over the period of a geothermal development starting today a number of countries may move to having a surplus in generation at some times or in some years • There will be competition for baseload generation • Large scale intermittent renewables change the marketplace

  7. Typical Daily Load Profile Peaking Load Following Baseload

  8. Competition for Baseload • Geoth ther ermal mal • Combin mbined ed Cycle le Gas Turbin bine • Coal l fired ed generation ration • Int ntermi ermitt tten ent t rene newable ables s – seasonal sonal or daily ly o Run un of river r hydr dro, o, wind nd • Intermi ermitt tten ent t renewables ables displac placing ing other er baseload load in the day because of “must run” priority: o Run un of river r hydr dro, o, wind, nd, solar ar • Expor porter ers s of ba baseload eload

  9. What Will Happen as the Baseload Market Gets Crowded? 1. Econom 1. onomic ic de despa patch ch rules es should ld app pply, but: o May be overridd rridden n by PPA term rms o Go Govern ernmen ment t polic icy y decisions sions may alloc ocat ate e losses ses 2. “Take or pay” and “must run” IPPs will be paid to 2. swit itch ch off: o Power r purchase hase costs ts will l exceed eed PPA A prices es o Who will l carry y the stran randed ded costs? ts?

  10. This Raises Significant Questions for Geothermal Development Projects, Whether Public or Private S ector… • Where here will geo eoth therm ermal l sit in econ onomic mic despatch spatch rul ules, es, com ompare red d with h run un-of of river r hydr dro, , wind, nd, even en solar ar? • How w will Governm ernment ent policy cy maker ers s respon pond? d? • Will com ompe petit ition ion for baseloa eload d sque ueeze eze prices es down? wn? • How w can geo eoth therm ermal l developers elopers influen ence ce the e mark rket? t? • What t will the e mark rket t look ok like e by the e time me a geoth thermal rmal project ect reaches ches comm mmiss ssionin ioning? g? Will ll demand emand rise e to meet t sup upply? • Could uld this s imp mpact act on off-tak taker r viability ility? • What t sort t of PPA A will be best st in the e fut uture? ure?

  11. Can Geothermal Operate as Load Following rather than Baseload? • Longer term the load following market should become more valuable Peaking • Flexible generation has to compensate for Load Following intermittent renewables Baseload • Demand will always have uncertainty

  12. Will Regional Markets Provide an Answer? • Most countr untrie ies see eem to expe pect t to sel ell rather er than buy in in the e reg egio ional mark rkets ets • Most see eem to wan ant to sel ell bas asel eload oad ap apar art from om da day ahea ead d balancin ing g trade des • Buy uyer ers s ar are m e more re lik ikel ely y long nger er ter erm to wan ant pe peak akin ing g and l d load d foll llowi wing g po power er • The dai e daily pe peak do does es vary y in in t tim ime e across oss the e reg egio ion, but ut en enoug ugh to cover er bas asel eload oad ope perat ation ion?

  13. Geothermal Position – is this reflected in market prices? • Despat patchab hable le • Local l commun munit ity y benefits its • Relia liable ble • Direct ect use options ions • Low operat rating ing costs ts • No energy gy price ce volati atility lity o Com ompe petit itive e once ce capital tal • Can offer r ancillar llary y servic vices es reco covered ered • No emission ssions • Insurance urance against nst drought ght risk sk • PPA A struct ructure ure may y lead to • Exploration ploration cost t and risk sk to non-despa despatc tch cover o e.g. g. st stea eam m su supply y treat ated ed as s • High gh capex x to cover an avoida idable ble energy nergy charge rge

  14. Power Purchase Risks and Negotiation Buyers will become more precise ise as to their r needs: • o Ov Overa rall cost and ri risk k will become more re important ant than n lowest st price ce • Flexib ibility ility will have a premium, ium, and therefore ore the load followi wing ng mark rket et will become attractiv ractive but also more re competitiv etitive Ancil illar lary y servic ices s will have a clear value • • The optimal mal allocation tion of risks ks betwee etween n buyers and d sellers will chang nge, e, but how? • EAGER has prepared “Guidance for a Geothermal Specific PPA” whic ich h starts ts to cover some of these points nts (availab ailable upon n re request) t)

  15. Geothermal Development – Business Models • East Afri rica ca is is se seei eing a g a conti tinuin uing g de debate e on ge geothe herma rmal l de devel elopm pmen ent t busin ines ess mode dels ls: o To go go pu public ic sec ector or or pr privat ivate e sec ector? or? o At whic ich h stage ge in in t the e de devel elopm pmen ent t pr process? ess? • Why ar Wh are di e differ eren ent t mode dels ls chosen osen in in dif differ eren ent t countr untrie ies, , at di differ eren ent t tim imes, es, and d even en for di differ eren ent t fie ields ds?

  16. Different Models at 5 Stages of the Process Costs are indicative and cumulative for a 50MW plant

  17. Which Models Have Been Used Historically?

  18. World’s Largest Geothermal Fields ( MW), 2016 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Geysers - US 850 850 Cerro Prieto - Mexico 720 720 Tongonan - Philippines 610 610 Olkaria - Kenya 585 585 Landarello - Italy 543 543 0 Mak-Ban - Philippines 458 458 Salton Sea - US 400 400 0 Salak - Indonesia 376 376 Darajat - Indonesia 270 270 Tiwi - Philippines 234 234 Wayang Windu - Indonesia 227 227 Wairakei - New Zealand 220 220 Heber - USA 205 205 Kamojang - Indonesia 200 200 Palinpinon - Philippines 192 192 Los Azufres - Mexico 188 188 Miravalles - Costa Rica 163 163 Coso - US 160 160 Travale - Italy 160 160 Average age Field d = 100 MW Bac-Man - Philippines 130 130 Public Private Public+Private

  19. Factors Impacting on Choice of Model Const strain int Model el 1 Model el 2 Model el 3 Model el 4 Model el 5 Limi mited d count ntry resour source ce X X Limi mited d pub ublic c fun unding ding X X X X Limi mited d private capital Limi mited d private e appet etit ite e X X X for risk Affordability Af dability X X Speed eed to produc ducti tion on X X X Limi mited d pub ublic c se sector or X X capabi bility lity Difficult cult or restr trict cted X geogr ograp aphy X X Coun untr try y cul ulture ure

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend