Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Uterine Lavage and Duplex - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

early detection of ovarian cancer using uterine lavage
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Uterine Lavage and Duplex - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Uterine Lavage and Duplex Sequencing GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 Paul Speiser Medical University Vienna, Dept. Gynecologic Oncology Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 Paul Speiser

Medical University Vienna, Dept. Gynecologic Oncology Molecular Oncology Group

Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer Using Uterine Lavage and Duplex Sequencing

1 Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Screening Recommendations US Preventative Services Task Force

Grade A There is high certainty that the net benefit is substantial - recommended Grade: A Recommendation Screening cervical cancer ages 21 to 65 years with Pap smear every 3 years. Screening colorectal cancer: fecal occult blood testing, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy, in adults, beginning at age 50

www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org

Detection of TP53 Mutations in Tampons of HGSC advanced stage patients 3 pos. out of 5 (60%) Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:881–5. DNA from Liquid Pap to detect Ovarian Cancer 22 Patients (4 early stage) 9 pos. (2eary stage) 41%

www.ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org 9 January 2013 Vol 5 Issue 167

Uterine Lavage to detect Müllerian Duct Carcinomas 30 Patients (3 early stage) 24 pos. (3 early stage) 80% J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4293-300.

Innovative Concepts for Screening

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3 Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

LUSTIC – Lavage of the Uterine cavity for diagnosis of Serous Tubal Intraepithelial Carcinoma

NCT02039388

Study aim:

  • Are exfoliated cells from STICs/occult carcinomas

transported into the uterine cavity?

  • Is it possible to collect those cells via uterine lavage and

detect them in the lavage fluid?

→ Earlier diagnosis of OC, or even its precursor lesions → Monitoring of HROC patients

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Study protocol:

Uterine lavage Histopath. examinatio n

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

STIC microdissection TP53 Sequencing Design a specific ddPCR assay TP53 mutation analysis

  • f lavage sample

Study protocol:

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

LUSTIC # Patients Klinikum Essen Mitte ✓ 34 Medical University of Graz ✓ 53 Charles University Prag ✓ 59 Hamburg-Eppendorf Universitätsklinikum ✓ 5 Catholic University Leuven ✓ 27 University College London ✓ 50 Trinity College Dublin ✓ 19 Radboud University Medical Center ✓ 5 Kopenhagen Rigshospitalet ✓ 11 Kepler Universitätsklinikum Linz ✓ 2 Brno Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute ✓ 7 Medical University of Vienna ✓ 36 308

= 3.6 %

Positive cases 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 11

✓ Tissue analysis

 Foll. phase

✓ Lavage analysis

 Shipment

✓✓✓ Tissue analysis ✓ Tissue analysis ✓ Tissue analysis ✓ Lavage positive ✓ Tissue analysis

Paul Speiser - Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group University Washington, Dept. Obst.&Gyn., Div. GYN ONC, Seminar, Mai 31st 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proof of principle:

  • Detection of early stage OC
  • Detection of occult carcinoma
  • Detection of STIC

8

Applicability of the Lavage Concept for Screening Purposes

Lavage IUD

local anesth. VAS minutes VAS interval local anesth. VAS minutes 3 8 4 7 2.5 8 3.5 8 2.8 7 2.2 6.3 7 8.2 7 2.2 1 3.8 8 1 3.9 6 1 1 7 1 3.2 5 1 3.8 7 1 7 1 1 3 6 1 3 5 1 2 7 1 1 7 1 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 2 5 3 1 1 6 1 2.8 6 2.8 1 3.8 7 1 1 9 1 1 7 1 3 10 1 1 8 1 1.2 8 1 1 3 4 1 2 5 1 5 1 2 5 1 0.5 4 1 8 1 4 1 1 6 1 1.5 4 1 1 6 1 2 4 1 1 5 1 4 5 1 2 8 1 1 0.5 6 1 2.3 7

Median 1.8 6.7 1.7 6.04

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9 Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Duplex Sequencing removes technological background > 10,000-fold error reduction

Increase signal Decrease noise

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Tumor TP53 mutation is identified in 80% of ovarian cancer patients, >10-fold over biological background mutation Low-frequency TP53 mutations are prevalent in women with and without ovarian cancer: “biological background”

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Biological background TP53 mutations in uterine lavage from cases and controls increase with age

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Background mutations are not random

Mutations are disproportionately non-synonymous

Exonic background mutations by class

Cancer cases Control cases

Proportion of mutations Background mutations by pathogenicity Proportion of mutations

Cancer cases Control cases

Mutations are disproportionately pathogenic

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Background mutations are not random

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TP53 mutations in normal GU tissues

Healthy 54 year old

Mutation load by tissue type

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TP53 mutations in normal GU tissues

Healthy 54 year old

Mutation load by tissue type

Average of 52-57 year olds

Department Gynecologic Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group GCIG Spring Meeting TRL Research Committee JUNE 2, 2017 / Paul Speiser

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Next steps...

  • Analysis of „healthy tissue“
  • SBIR Grant:

Phase I Ideal sample preparation Validate sensitivity and reproducibility of high-througput DS Phase II TP53 Sequencing of uterine lavage samples of 100 average risk women with HGSC 100 average risk cancer-free controls 15 high-risk BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers with microscopic HGSC 100 high-risk BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers controls

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Morgenfortbildung 16.3.2017/ Elisabeth Maritschnegg

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FDA Presubmission Meeting, Washington

May 2016

18 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Morgenfortbildung 16.3.2017/ Paul Speiser

The Early Detection Research Network (EDRN) June 7, 2017 Presentation to the Breast/GYN Collaborative Group

LOVE Trial - Lavage of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes for OVarian cancer Early detection Sensitivity & Specificity lavage concept in detecting STIC/occult EOC 2160 HBOC women, 6-monthly screen, 5%, 108 occult HGSC or STIC

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Acknowledgements

University of Washington Larry Loeb Rosana Risques Katy Loubet-Senear Loeb lab Risques lab Kennedy lab TwinStrand Biosciences Inc. Jesse Salk Medical University of Vienna Molecular Onvology Group Robert Zeillinger Elisabeth Maritschnegg

MUG, Universitätsklinik f. Frauenheilkunde u. Geburtshilfe , Gunda Pristauz, Karl Tamussiono – Graz, Austria Klinikum Essen Mitte, Department Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology, Florian Heitz, Andreas du Bois – Essen, Germany Charité University - Campus Virchow Clinic, Department of Gynecology, Jalid Sehouli – Berlin, Germany Charles University, Department of Obst.&Gyn., Gyn. Oncology Center, David Cibula – Prague, Czech Republic Charles University, Department of Obst.&Gyn., Dr. Jiri Bouda, Dr. Alena Bartakova – Pilsen, Czech Republic – 16 Samples University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Gynecology, Sven Mahner – Hamburg, Germany Catholic University Leuven, Division Gynaecological Oncology, Ignace Vergote – Leuven, Belgium The UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study (UK FOCSS), UCL, Martin Widschwendter – London, UK Radboud Universiteit/Research Inst. Oncology, Univ. of Nijmegen Leon Massuger, – Nijmegen, Netherlands Trinity College, St James's Hospital, Department Gynaecologic Oncology, Noreen Gleeson – Dublin, Ireland University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Department of Gynaecology, Mikkel Rosendahl – Kopenhagen, Denmark

Isaac Kinde, Yuxuan Wang, Lius Diaz, Kenneth Kinzler, Nickolas Papadopoulos, Bert Vogelstein