e
play

E S Excellence Emergency Medicine Recognised as a specialty in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

E S Excellence Emergency Medicine Recognised as a specialty in 1993 Prevention, diagnosis and management of acute and urgent aspects of illness and injury Encompasses the full spectrum of episodic undifferentiated physical and


  1. E S Excellence

  2. Emergency Medicine • Recognised as a specialty in 1993 • Prevention, diagnosis and management of acute and urgent aspects of illness and injury • Encompasses the full spectrum of episodic undifferentiated physical and behavioural disorders • Rapid growth ; by 2011 in Australia and New Zealand: • 1377 Fellows (currently increasing by ≥100 per year) • ~8 MILLION Emergency Dept. presentations per annum • Academic development has lagged behind • Initial focus on undergraduate and postgraduate training • Systems of care and simple clinical studies • WA has the only University Department of EM in Australasia

  3. NIH Emergency Research Roundtable Ann Emerg Med 2010 • “Crisis in emergency care in the United States, including a need to enhance the research base for emergency care”  NIH Task Force on Research in Emergency Medicine • Focus for EM research • Timing, sequence, and time sensitivity of disease processes and treatment effects. • Evidence gaps – clinical priorities • Infection, sepsis, septic shock • Respiratory / allergy emergencies • Resuscitation; hypotension and ischemia-reperfusion • Acute chest pain and acute abdominal pain • Geriatrics.

  4. US EM research networks • EMERGEncy ID Net • Syndromic surveillance/research of emerging infections in the US • 12 geographically diverse urban Eds. • Emergency Medicine Network (EMNet) • Began as the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration (MARC) with a focus on respiratory/allergy emergencies • Expanded to include health policy & public health objectives • 204 medical centers http://www.emnet-usa.org • Neurological Emergency Treatment Trials (NETT) • Interventional trials on acute neurologic disorders • Organized around a clinical coordinating centre with 10 to 20 clinical “hubs” http://nett.umich.edu/nett/welcome

  5. US EM research networks • Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) • Focus is observational and randomized trials for acute illnesses and injuries in children, and it comprises 4 research “nodes” with 22 participating sites. http://www.pecarn.org • Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) • Focus on out-of-hospital research in management of cardiopulmonary arrest and severe traumatic injury • 10 regional centres across North America. http://roc.uwctc.org/tiki/tikiindex.php • US Critical Illness and Injuries Trial Group (USCIITG) • Focus is to establish priorities for critical illness injury research. http://public.wudosis.wustl.edu/USCIITG/default.aspx

  6. Opportunities • Emergency Medicine • High growth, increasingly important part of health care • Hospital entry point for acute illness and injury • Covers the time frame when many interventions have greatest potential to change disease course • UWA has a unique (leading) position in Australasian EM • We have a group of EDs in WA, interstate and NZ with proven ability to work together and recruit patients into multicentre clinical studies

  7. Achievements so far • Some “firsts” for EM in Australasia • Integration of bedside and laboratory research in the ED • A Clinical Nurse Manager Emergency Research with a team of Clinical Research Nurses on the floor, extended hours • Inclusion of an EM group in a research institute (WAIMR) • Competitive grants • With collaborators in a variety of disciplines • With interstate collaborators • Clinical trials • Ranging from simple <-> complex/mechanistic • Multi-centre, interstate and overseas collaborations

  8. Liverpool Hospital New Zealand Core group with research infrastructure Established collaborations >8 years

  9. Where might C(s)CREM fit in? • Focus on linking confirmatory and hypothesis-generating mechanistic laboratory work with clinical trials in the ED, is novel and internationally competitive. • ASP  ASP-FFP • RAVE I  RAVE II • EDA I  EDA II • CISS/BLISS  • POLAR and the NRP  • Australian collaboration to link in with international networks • Translation of research into EM clinical practice in Australia • Career development of Australian EM academics

  10. Proposal

  11. CRE Objectives • General • Improve outcomes for acutely ill and injured patients by optimising early management in the ED phase of care • Specific • Conduct high quality, collaborative, multi-centre clinical trials with patient-focussed outcomes that are relevant to the acute (ED) phase of patient care (the undifferentiated patient) • Provide a framework for professional development of EM academics, with a focus on high quality clinical trials • Integrate within our trials, wherever possible, mechanistic (explanatory and/or hypothesis generating) laboratory investigations

  12. Structure • Collaborative patient recruitment across all sites • Each centre leads one or more themes across group • Research nurse coordinator(s) at each centre, funded by CRE, managing local cluster of EDs • Centre 1 responsible for statistical and logistics support (incl. data management, audit, trial pack procurement, shipping etc.) Statistics and logistical support Centre 1 Centre Centre 2 3

  13. Incentive = mutual benefit • EM clinical research is particularly difficult because of the diversity of presentations / diseases • Collaborative recruitment across all sites = numbers that would be impossible even for a large centre on its own • Each participating centre has opportunity to lead the group in area(s) where its staff have specific expertise • Critical mass of researchers - multiple areas of expertise across several sites and funding from a variety of sources  ability to maintain multiple studies and thus a productive research “engine” in each ED

  14. Problems • Track records are competitive within the field of EM, but modest in general NHMRC terms • Need to get more runs on the board as a group • So much time spent on writing grant proposals • VIC and QLD are poised to make huge leaps forward due to massive investments in EM research and we will loose our competitive edge in the next 2-3 years

  15. Strategy • Over the last 2 years; • Agreed priority areas • Sepsis / Respiratory • Brain injury (trauma and stroke) • Anaphylaxis • PhD students (2 senior EM specialists) • Pursuing collaborations with other specialties • Developed a range of projects that are ready to go / underway • Maintain and develop key partnerships with “sister hospitals” • See similar acute trauma/medical caseload as RPH • Have clinical academics and support staff on site • Have proven themselves to be reliable research partners (Liverpool Hospital NSW, Royal Brisbane Hospital QLD)

  16. What we need now • Discretional funding in the order of ~$250,000 over 2 years to widen the scope of our “ready -to- go” projects • Already funded and underway within CCREM • Expand to include 2 interstate centres • Stipend for 1-2 full time lab PhD students, to work alongside our two current clinical PhD students. • This will quickly establish a track record for the group and UWA leadership, with data and publications starting within 12 months.

  17. Bluntly • SMAHS spends just under $1M p.a. on CCREM (3 hospitals) • Senior clinical (consultant) staff (5), with ~2.5 FTE allocated to research • Research support staff (5 FTE Research Nurses and 1 FTE RA) • WAIMR/RPHMRF provides considerable laboratory infrastructure • NHMRC, other competitive grants, and HDWA infrastructure grants fund the CCREM laboratory • UWA… (not so much yet) • ?missing an opportunity

  18. Proposed organisational structure

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend