Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study Board of Directors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dumbarton transportation corridor study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study Board of Directors - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study Board of Directors December 6, 2017 Two Bridges 2 Challenges Regional context, many stakeholders Consensus on use of the SamTrans-owned rail ROW Consensus on highway bridge and approach


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Dumbarton Transportation Corridor Study

Board of Directors December 6, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Two Bridges

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Challenges

3

  • Regional context, many stakeholders
  • Consensus on use of the SamTrans-owned

rail ROW

  • Consensus on highway bridge and

approach improvements with regional partners

  • $2.5 billion price tag
  • Funding availability and P3 suitability
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Purpose and Need

4

  • Purpose: Examine existing transportation

deficiencies and identify capital improvements and

  • perational programs that enhance multi-modal

mobility for local and regional travelers while minimizing impacts to the environment and surrounding communities

  • Need:

− Jobs-housing imbalance − Lack of regional transportation connectivity, limited transbay travel options − Roadway congestion and lengthy travel times

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Enhance mobility
  • Cost effectiveness
  • Minimize environmental impacts,

financial risk and maximize safety

  • Protect local communities from adverse

impacts

5

Project Goals

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Outreach and Comments

6

  • Outreach

− 2 Stakeholder meetings − 4 Public meetings − Approx. 15 additional presentations

  • Comments

− Over 400 received via email, website, telephone, letter, at meetings, etc. − Desire for bicycle/pedestrian multi-use path − Concern regarding local impacts − Support for high capacity transit solutions − Responses provided in FAQ

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Draft vs Final

7

  • Final recommendations are consistent with

the Draft except:

− Bicycle/pedestrian multi-use path is not excluded at this time

  • Key questions to answer in next phase:

− What does it take to accommodate 3 modes in the ROW? − Is it possible to safely implement a shared bus and bicycle lane? − What are the operational impacts of constructing

  • nly one bus lane (instead of two), leaving room

for a bicycle/pedestrian multi-use path?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Review of Final Recommendations

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recommendations 2020

  • Expand Dumbarton Express bus including

new routes to Menlo Park/Redwood City and Mountain View/Sunnyvale

  • Approach improvements
  • Impacts

− $51m capital, $12m O/M − 34% increase in transit − Involved entities: AC Transit, ACTC, MTC, Caltrans, cities, etc.

  • Bicycle/pedestrian multi-use path on ROW

to be examined further

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recommendations 2025

  • Improve the Highway Bridge and Approaches

− One express lane in each direction − More approach improvements east and west bay (flyovers, grade separations, etc.) − Buses use ROW to US-101 flyover

  • Rail service on the Rail Bridge

− Rail Shuttle to Newark (double-tracked bridge)

  • Impact

− $1.8b capital, $44m O/M − Involved entities: Caltrain, UP, ACTC, MTC, Caltrans, STB, cities, etc.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recommendations 2030

  • Further enhance Dumbarton Express bus

service (greater frequencies)

  • Extend rail service

− Rail Shuttle from Newark to Union City

  • Impact

− $377m capital (in addition to $1.8b in 2025), $46m O/M − Involved entities: Caltrain, UP, ACTC, MTC, Caltrans, STB, cities, etc.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Interline with Caltrain
  • Better connect/coordinate with

ACE, Capitol Corridor

  • Impact

− $327m additional capital, $38m O/M − ~23,300 daily transbay riders (270% increase) paired with enhanced bus service/express lanes on Highway Bridge − Involved entities: AC Transit, Caltrain, UP, ACE, Capitol Corridor, MTC, etc.

12

Recommendations 2035

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Path Forward

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Where We Are Today

14

March 2016 December 2017 August 2017 Feasibility Study Final Outreach Board Approval MTC DAA of Short-Term Improvements

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MTC DAA

15

  • Design Alternatives Assessment

− October 2017 – April 2018 − Further develop short-term strategies − Evaluate performance and feasibility − Advance recommendations to project development − Dumbarton Express operations plan and further Highway and approach improvements (including express lanes) analysis to likely follow

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Early Actions

16

December 2017 March 2018 Board Approval MTC DAA of Short- Term Improvements Dumbarton Express Operations Analysis September 2018 Technical Refinement: Rail Bridge and ROW Improvements April 2019

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Technical Refinement

17

  • Rail Bridge and ROW Improvements:

− Modes on ROW − Bike planning − Standard gauge rail technologies − Rail operations − Determine appropriate next steps, including processes, stakeholders, schedule and budget

slide-18
SLIDE 18

P3 Analysis

18

  • Assess financial feasibility and risks
  • Procurement approaches
  • Value for money analysis
  • Focus on rail analysis, consider express

lanes following MTC DAA

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Comments/Questions