District Achievement Overview Board Report September 19,2017 Naomi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

district achievement overview board report
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

District Achievement Overview Board Report September 19,2017 Naomi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

District Achievement Overview Board Report September 19,2017 Naomi Calvo, Director of Research, Evaluation & Assessment 1 The Bellevue School District Mission: To provide all students with an exemplary college preparatory education so


slide-1
SLIDE 1

District Achievement Overview Board Report

September 19,2017 Naomi Calvo, Director of Research, Evaluation & Assessment

The Bellevue School District Mission:  To provide all students with an exemplary college preparatory education so they can succeed in college, career and life. 1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

2

  • 1. Highlights
  • 2. Additional Information & Data
  • 3. Next Steps
  • 4. Q & A
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Highlights (1/3)

3

  • Are we making progress on our ‘Academic Success’ Instructional Initiative key

indicators?

  • BSD student performance on our key indicators continues to be strong but static,

for a fifth consecutive year. A high percentage of students are meeting standards -- around 75-90% depending on the indicator – but we have seen slight if any gains

  • ver time.
  • For comparison purposes, statewide progress has been similarly flat over the last

three years, with the exception of gains in science.

  • Science is a bright spot: science scores have gradually been increasing over the last

decade (despite the fact that the state tests are no longer aligned to current science standards)

  • Three-year progress by cohort is mostly either flat or erratic, with several
  • exceptions. Current 6th graders have made steady progress in ELA over the last three

years (74 to 82%), but have decreased proficiency in math over the same time period (80 to 72%). Current 7th graders have similarly declining scores in math (down six points), while current 8th graders have made progress in ELA (up four points).

Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 9

  • Are students making adequate progress over the course of the year?
  • We have substantially more ‘high growth’ students than the national average, and

fewer ‘low growth’ students as well.

  • However, an alarming number of our low-performing students are also ‘low growth’,

which means they are not on track to catch up.

Slide 11

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Highlights (2/3)

4

  • How do BSD scores compare to the state average on reading, math and

science state tests?

  • BSD pass rates are well above the state average in all subjects and grade levels

(generally around 20 percentage points above average in grades 3-8, and around 12 points above average in high school)

  • BSD has an exceptionally high rate of students exceeding standards, which reflects
  • ur teaching quality, robust curriculum, and student body

Slides 12-13 Slide 14

  • Are we closing our race achievement gaps?
  • No; for the most part our race gaps have not diminished over time and in some cases

appear to be increasing (Black and Hispanic student scores are declining in elementary school, widening the gap). Our racial equity work is ongoing.

Slides 15-18

  • What about other achievement gaps?
  • Large gaps persist by income, ELL and special education status. The pass rate for

students from higher-income families (~80%) is almost twice that of students from low-income families (~40%). The exact numbers vary by grade level and subject, but generally special education and ELL students have pass rates of 25-45% compared to

  • ver 80% among students not receiving these services. Girls are also out-performing

boys in ELA by around 10 percentage points in elementary school, and 6 points in middle school.

Slides 19-21

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Highlights (3/3)

5

  • What is the timeline for progress on our ‘Academic Success’ Instructional

Initiative?

  • We have three overarching strategies for achieving our Academic Success goals:
  • MTSS (including both academic and behavioral aspects)
  • Racial equity focus (including culturally responsive teaching & learning)
  • Inclusion focus (for special education and ELL services)
  • Implementing these strategies requires re-thinking district systems and shifting

classroom pedagogy. This is a long-term endeavor. We are in the process of identifying milestones for implementation and impact for all three strategies, based

  • n the SWIFT framework and other tools.
  • One of the primary barriers we are working to address is how to provide sufficient

professional development time for staff, in order to deepen classroom practices around MTSS, culturally responsive teaching & learning, and inclusion.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Progress over time on key Academic Success indicators has been fairly flat

6

Indicator 2015 2016 2017 3rd Grade ELA SBA 73% 76% 74% 5th Grade Math SBA 74% 77% 73% 7th Grade Writing SBA* 91% 91% 92% 8th Grade Science MSP 81% 88% 84% Selected Indicators for the Academic Success Instructional Initiative

  • Literacy Indicator Goal: 100% reading at grade level by end of third grade.
  • Math Indicator Goal: 100% proficient in math by end of fifth grade.
  • Writing Indicator Goal: 100% of seventh graders proficient in writing.
  • Science Indicator Goal: 100% of eighth graders proficient in science.

*SBA scores here are for the Writing strand, a section of the English Language Arts test, and show the percent at/near or above standard. (SBA subtests are scored as below standard, at/near standard, or above standard.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Statewide progress has been similarly fairly flat in ELA and math, with some progress in science

7 Proficiency Rates Change Over Time Indicator 2015 2016 2017 2015 to 2016 2016 to 2017 Net 2015 to 2017 BSD Grade 3 ELA 73% 76% 74% 3

  • 2

1 State Grade 3 ELA 52% 54% 53% 2

  • 1

1 BSD Grade 5 Math 74% 77% 73% 3

  • 4
  • 1

State Grade 5 Math 48% 49% 49% 1 1 BSD Grade 8 Science 81% 88% 84% 7

  • 4

3 State Grade 8 Science 61% 68% 66% 7

  • 2

5

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Science scores have generallybeen increasing over time

Note: BSD has adopted the Next Generation Science Standards, but the state science test measures old state standards. Thus the state test is not aligned to what students are learning in science, and won’t be until the new science test begins in the spring of 2018.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Progress differs somewhat by cohort*

9

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 2015 2016 2017 ELA 74% 79% 82% Math 80% 77% 72% 2015 2016 2017 ELA 79% 83% 79% Math 82% 81% 76% 2015 2016 2017 ELA 81% 81% 85% Math 76% 76% 77% 2015 2016 2017 ELA 78% 82% 81% Math 71% 78% 72%

LEGEND Upward trend Flat or erratic Downward trend

*Note: Students must have test scores for all three consecutive years in order to be included in the cohort results shown here.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

While we don’t have state test scores for primary students (grades K-2), we do have standards-based progress reports

10 Grade Level Reading Math Science Total # Kindergarten 82% 88% 98% 1359 Grade 1 83% 89% 95% 1480 Grade 2 87% 85% 96% 1573 Grade 3 74% 80% 83%

(grade 5)

1465

Percent of K-2 Students Meeting Standards on Progress Reports, Spring 2017

SBA pass rates Progress report grades 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

In addition to performance(the percent of students meeting state standards), it is helpful to look at growth(how much progress students make over the course of the year).

What is STAR’s student growth measure? STAR growth scores reflect the amount of progress that a student made over the course of the year relative to his/her academic peers nationally (“academic peers” are same-grade students who started the year with similar achievement levels). By convention, “low growth” is the bottom third of the distribution, “typical growth” is the middle third, and “high growth” is the top third. Generally students need to be at least at the 40th growth percentile to stay on track, so when we don’t need to look at a more nuanced distribution we often use just two categories, with “low growth” being below the 40th growth percentile and “solid growth” being above.

Growth Category BSD Reading BSD Math 2016 2017 2016 2017 Low 26% 28% 28% 31% Typical 34% 31% 32% 30% High 41% 41% 40% 38% BSD continues to have slightly fewer “low growth” students and more “high growth” students than the national average, in both reading & math.

Percent of students making low, typical and high growth in reading and math (STAR grades 3-8)

Note: For comparison purposes, the national average is 33% in each category. 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BSD students score well above the state average on SBA, in all grade levels and subjects

12

English Language Arts Math

12

3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 11th BSD 74% 75% 80% 76% 83% 78% 87% State 53% 55% 59% 56% 60% 59% 74% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

SBA English Language Arts Pass Rates by Grade: BSD compared to WA Average - 2017

BSD State 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th BSD 80% 74% 73% 74% 77% 70% State 58% 54% 49% 48% 50% 48% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

SBA Math Pass Rates by Grade: BSD compared to WA average - 2017

BSD State

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Science

*Note: 5th and 8th scores are for the science MSP test, which is only given in those two grade levels. The 10th grade scores are for the Biology End-

  • f-Course test (EOC), which students take when they finish Biology (generally in 9th grade but sometimes 8th or 10th). The 10th grade scores

shown here reflect the percent of students who have passed the Biology EOC by the end of 10th grade.

13

SBA comparisons, continued

5th 8th 10th* BSD 83% 84% 90% State 63% 66% 72% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Science Pass Rates by Grade: BSD compared to WA Average - 2017

BSD State

slide-14
SLIDE 14

BSD has a particularly high proportion of students who exceed standards, compared to the state average

14

Some examples (Spring 2017):

3rd Grade ELA 5th Grade Math

Statewide, about 50% of third graders met standards on ELA. In BSD, about 50% of third graders exceeded standards on ELA.

Well Below Standard Below Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Are we making progress on productively closing the race achievement gaps?

15

Race gaps: elementary school ELA

Race gaps persist, and appear to be widening in elementary school 15

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2015 2016 2017

ELA SBA % Proficient, Grades 3-5

All Asian Black Latino Multi-Ethnic White

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Race gaps: elementary school math

16

16

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2015 2016 2017

Math SBA Proficiency, Grades 3-5

All Asian Black Latino Multi-Ethnic White

Race gaps persist, and appear to be widening in elementary school

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Race gaps: middle school ELA

17

17 Gaps are fairly static in middle school

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2015 2016 2017

ELA SBA Proficiency, Grades 6-8

All Asian Black Latino Multi-Ethnic White

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Race gaps: middle school math

18

Note: High school analyses will be included in future Career & College Readiness reports.

18

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2015 2016 2017

Math SBA % Proficient, Grades 6-8

All Asian Black Latino Multi-Ethnic White

Gaps are fairly static in middle school

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Other achievement gaps exist as well

19

% Meeting Standards (Progress Reports) Subgroup ELA Math Total # Race/Ethnicity Asian 89% 93% 1822 Black 76% 70% 118 Hispanic 68% 66% 594 Multi-Ethnic 86% 90% 415 White 85% 90% 1441 Free/Reduced Price Meals F/R 62% 63% 770 Not F/R 89% 92% 3630 Gender Female 86% 87% 2114 Male 82% 87% 2286 ELL Status ELL TBD TBD TBD Not ELL TBD TBD TBD Special Education Has IEP 67% 71% 330 No IEP 85% 88% 4070 Total 84% 87% 4400 19

Achievement Gaps, Grades K-2, 2017 (Spring Progress Report, % Meeting Standards)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

SBA Achievement Gaps, Grades 3-5, Spring 2017

20

% Meeting Standards Category Subgroup ELA Math Total # Race/Ethnicity Asian 84% 87% 1854 Black 40% 33% 118 Hispanic 44% 43% 563 Multi-Ethnic 81% 78% 403 White 80% 76% 1644 Free/Reduced Price Meals F/R 43% 39% 833 Not F/R 83% 83% 3752 Gender Female 81% 74% 2201 Male 72% 76% 2384 ELL Status ELL 30% 42% 608 Not ELL 83% 81% 3977 Special Education Has IEP 44% 40% 361 No IEP 79% 78% 4224 504 Status Has 504 67% 68% 195 No 504 76% 76% 4390 Gifted/Traditional Program Gifted 100% 100% 739 Traditional 72% 71% 3846 Total 76% 75% 4585 20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

SBA Achievement Gaps, Grades 6-8, Spring 2017

21

% Meeting Standards Category Subgroup ELA Math Total # Race/Ethnicity Asian 87% 88% 1755 Black 51% 37% 112 Hispanic 52% 35% 502 Multi-Ethnic 83% 78% 415 White 80% 72% 1779 Free/Reduced Price Meals F/R 49% 37% 787 Not F/R 85% 81% 3779 Gender Female 82% 74% 2195 Male 76% 73% 2371 ELL Status ELL 25% 36% 330 Not ELL 83% 76% 4236 Special Education Has IEP 40% 26% 350 No IEP 82% 77% 4216 504 Status Has 504 68% 64% 279 No 504 79% 74% 4287 Gifted/Traditional Program Gifted 100% 100% 799 Traditional 74% 68% 3767 Total 79% 74% 4566 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Next Steps: 2017-18 School Year Priorities

22

Elementary Middle High Academic MTSS Focus Balanced Literacy Algebra I Algebra I /Geometry Block Behavioral MTSS Focus School-wide PBIS (Relationships focus) Equity & Inclusion School Equity/Inclusion Teams

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions / More Information

23 For additional information regarding this presentation contact: The Bellevue School District Mission:  To provide all students with an exemplary college preparatory education so they can succeed in college, career and life. Naomi Calvo, Director of Research, Evaluation & Assessment Email: calvon@bsd405.org Phone: (425) 456-4274