Deep Learning, not Disease Marc Lewis Radboud University Nijmegen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

deep learning not disease
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Deep Learning, not Disease Marc Lewis Radboud University Nijmegen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Addiction, Brain Change, and Gambling: Deep Learning, not Disease Marc Lewis Radboud University Nijmegen Independent journalist / science writer Models of Addiction Disease model Choice model Social construction of addiction


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Addiction, Brain Change, and Gambling: Deep Learning, not Disease

Marc Lewis Radboud University Nijmegen Independent journalist / science writer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Models of Addiction

  • Disease model
  • Choice model
  • Social construction of addiction
  • Traumatic early history
  • Developmental-learning model
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Addiction defined as a brain disease

  • NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse):

“Addiction is defined as a chronic, relapsing brain disease that is characterized by compulsive drug seeking and use, despite harmful consequences.” “Brain-imaging studies from drug-addicted individuals show physical changes in areas of the brain that are critical for judgment, decision-making, learning and memory, and behavior control.”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Striatum: Nucleus accumbens Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex Midbrain

The Bridge of the Ship The Motivational Engine Dopamine Pump

slide-5
SLIDE 5

From Connolly, Bell, Foxe, & Garavan. PLOS ONE, vol. 8, 2013.

Looks suspiciously like brain disease…?

Use it or Lose it?!?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

But what if it’s not a disease?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Reinterpreting the neural data…

  • If brains change with learning and

development, then brain change doesn’t necessarily mean brain disease

  • But how do brains change with development?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Changes in cortical density from age 4 through age 20 (from averaged MRI data)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Development = Synaptic growth + synaptic pruning

  • Synaptic growth  flexibility, novelty, increasing range of knowledge and skills
  • Synaptic pruning  consolidation, efficiency, habit formation
slide-10
SLIDE 10

If this thinning is viewed as synaptic pruning…. …then we should not be surprised by further synaptic alteration!

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Since pruning makes the brain more efficient…

  • …the addict’s brain learns to aim behaviour toward (expected) rewards –

i.e., tuning the brain to the goodies

  • I think it’s exactly the same for gamblers
  • So, addiction (including gambling) is highly efficient

– striatal tuning – gradual shift from impulsive (ventral striatum) to COMpulsive (dorsal striatum) tuning

  • This “efficient” reward-seeking tries to counteract three kids of loss

– short-term loss – long-term “blunting” – longer-term isolation, shame, and despair

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 1. Strong attraction  repetition  deep

learning  deliberate mood regulation

  • 2. Getting trapped by “now appeal”
  • 3. Ego fatigue: the loss of self-control

So why is it so hard to stop?

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 1. The classic feedback cycle in addiction

Craving

Drug imagery

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cycle of brain activation

Planning: To do or Not to do

Midbrain

Action

Imagining Perception Trigger

14

DO IT!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

….ongoing modification of networks

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Shift of activation from ventral to dorsal striatum

Midbrain

16

DO IT!

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 2. Now Appeal
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dopamine focuses attention on the immediate goal….

 craving

The circuitry of desire

slide-19
SLIDE 19

…dopamine is tuned to the cake.

Why is that man going after the cake?

Craving  delay discounting = “now appeal”

 Because it seems worth more than imagined future happiness

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The grip of the immediate goal …outweighs the imagined future!

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 3. Ego fatigue
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hungry?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cues, cues, cues

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Cues, cues, cues

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Gambling…

  • …looks similar to substance addiction in the

brain and in real life

slide-27
SLIDE 27

From Brewer & Potenza (2008). The neurobiology and genetics of impulse control disorders: Relationships to drug addictions, Biochemical Pharmacology, vol 75.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

But gambling may be particularly insidious

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Reward-predicting stimuli  dopamine rush
  • Reward prediction error  dopamine tuning
  • Reward uncertainty  ?  ??  ???  ????

Dopamine has three jobs

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The three faces of dopamine

From Schultz, 2007. Trends in Neuroscience.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Reward prediction --

  • - reward prediction error

But what goes on here?!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The lure of uncertainty

“One of the main underlying factors to the phenomenon of loss-chasing may relate to the importance of reward uncertainty….. In PG, accumbens DA is maximal during a gambling task when the probability of winning and losing money is identical—a 50% chance for a two-outcome event representing maximal uncertainty…”

Anselme et al., 2013. What motivates gambling behavior? Insight into dopamine's role. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Snakes and shocks study

Designed to track “irreducible uncertainty” ….surrounding 50% level. De Berker et al. (2015). Nature Communications 7.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Excitement/stress peaks with uncertainty

“Irreducible uncertainty best predicted subjective stress responses.”

slide-35
SLIDE 35

“The pathological gambling (PG) group shows a significant (p < .002) quadratic Relationship between [dopamine uptake in striatum] and probability of selecting advantageous decks (P(IGT)). The healthy control group shows no significant quadratic interaction.” Linnet et al. (2012) Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging. 204, 55–60.

Iowa Gambling Task: variability and dopamine

slide-36
SLIDE 36

In sum: brain change with addiction

PFC = judgment Midbrain = dopamine

36

Now Appeal Ego fatigu e

and gambling

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The disease model of addiction isn’t just wrong… It’s also harmful!

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Why the disease model fails addicts

  • The disease model calls for medical treatment
  • “Medicalization” makes addicts into patients
  • Patients don’t feel they have the power to change

their goals

  • Because they’re not formulating those goals

(somebody else is…)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Empowerment is an antidote to ego fatigue

But how do we encourage it?

slide-40
SLIDE 40

What happens when you give the wheel to your teenage kid?

Utilize addicts’ desire for other goals

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Stretching one’s sense of time into the future is an antidote to now appeal

But how do we help addicts & gamblers connect with their past and their future?

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Help them see their life as a narrative …embedded in a past …and stretching into a desired future

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Ainslie’s Intertemporal dialogue

Perhaps they can start a dialogue with a future self

slide-44
SLIDE 44

But addicts have a hard time seeing their future self as anyone but an addict….

And addicts aren’t trustworthy!

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Striatum Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

The Bridge of the Ship The Motivational Engine

Reconnect… …empowerment to a sense of personal time

slide-46
SLIDE 46

How do you change the brain?

  • Frontal lobotomy
  • Meditation
  • Psychotherapy
  • Development itself
  • NOT believing you have a chronic disease
  • Not by taking drugs (e.g., opiate substitutes, sedatives, antagonists)
  • Not by repeating familiar slogans
  • Not by continuing to do what you’ve been doing

But by…

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Notes for update for Australia

  • The flow experience is considered the most addictive of all states: see

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1MHyyWsMeE at 20:00 for discussion, esp idea of hypofrontality…suppressing the dlPFC…we like turning it off

  • Also see Maia’s talk about dopamine and the hedonic treadmill phenomenon –

very relevant! – The Influence

  • Notes from Monday night:

– Amazing flatness of affect whether just won or just lost…almost nil – When I hovered a bit, I was asked to go away several times. Looks like shame…or else just wanting to be in your own world – Idea of two types: those who just oscillate vs those who go down hard and wipe themselves out – Anger (e.g. at the dealer) even if you’re a winner (1000 ahead at roulette) after a few losses…. 4:00 on George Paddy Power recording, also 9:13 for a failed attempt at imagining a different future; on George William recording, ; 8:25 Don’t’ talk to me, let me be, also 10:30 for a glimpse of Just Say No uselessness