DDH-17 Forward 2017 Design Delegation Holders Seminar Shaun Johnson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Present and the Future: DDH-17 Forward 2017 Design Delegation Holders Seminar Shaun Johnson Manager Airworthiness May 2017 DDHC-17 The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong
2017 Design Delegation Holders’ Seminar
Shaun Johnson Manager Airworthiness
May 2017
“The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong, it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair.”
― Douglas Adams
30% 21% 16% 8% 7% 6% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0%
4997 Aircraft for Potential Design Support
Small Aeroplanes Microlight Helicopters Parachute, Paraglider, or Hang Glider Glider or Power Glider Amateur Built Aircraft Sport Aeroplane Agricultural Aeroplanes Medium Aeroplanes Gyroplane Balloon Other
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Agricultural Aeroplanes Helicopters Medium Aeroplanes Small Aeroplanes Sport Aircraft Amateur Built Aircraft Balloon Glider or Power Glider Gyroplane Microlight Parachute, Paraglider, Hang Glider
Private/Other Certificate Part 119 Operator Part 119 & 137 Operator Part 137 Operator Part 115 Operator
aviation engineering starts with you
Assessment, RPAS design/manufacturing approvals and Type Certificates
40 18 5 6 14 2 15
ATA Group Workload Breakdown by Task
Immediate safety risk Certification, registration, exemptions Surveillance Relationship management Outreach/safety promotion Interventions Advice to industry Gaining Knowledge
AU Availability to Support to Engineering Change
this structure
total funded workload
engineering-change via 337
airworthiness responsibility for engineering change
agricultural aviation operations), the accident rate is not trending down as quickly as desired, is stalling or is showing signs of reversal. Research indicates that for agricultural operations risks are often not identified, resulting in safety failures.10
improvement and that a different, more proactive approach to identify and address safety risks is needed. ICAO has identified that further safety gains under the traditional rule and compliance system alone will be increasingly difficult to achieve.11
current regulatory system which is based on rules which set minimum standards, quality management systems and CAA audits focussed on compliance with the minimum standards.
increase in the number of air accidents. A more proactive approach to identify and address safety risks, through the implementation of risk management systems, is warranted.
Regulatory Impact Statement
A Risk-Based Approach to Aviation Safety Regulation
Technology Technology Technology
L O W M E D I U M H I G H
Level of Risk
Technology
· Oversee Operational Safety · Oversee Operational Safety · Determine Compliance (Technical Review) 1.FULL VA Issues Certificate 2.APPROVAL VA Issues Letter of Approval 3.RECOGNITION
Level of Involvement
Validating Authority
Methods of Acceptance Data Request (purpose)
Company Company Company Company
Bilateral Relationship Certifying Authority Certifying Authority Certifying Authority Certifying Authority
I n c r e a s i n g L e v e l
R i s k
solutions
and purpose
Welcome to Hamilton, City of the Future
id we hear?
Johnson – NZ
Z air aircraft fle fleet siz size, rea ealities s of
eam siz size, work
planning
Hugh ghes – CAA
AA work
s for
public, , Sa Safety focu
s, reduced in involvement through earl early en engag agement, FPP FPP
John Parn rnell ll – get Ind
ndemnity / lia liability ins insurance, con
sider the he health and and sa safety in in the work
Ac Act, CAA AA Not
Jason Ashworth th – Maj
ajor vs s Min inor, 33 337s 7s, , Rol
s of
DDH vs s IA
David id Moo
Dave Wes eston – BK
BK-117 7 Ex Ext-Fuel & 13 1309 09
ichard Andrews – cos
and com
a small all des design tea eam
John Aplin lin – we
e may no not be be acc accurate bu but we e ar are fas ast, im importance of
early com
Ho-Joon Lim Lim - Sa
Safety con
xplained, focu
isk, NORSE SEE ini initiatives
el Ses essio ion – Com
between 14 146, 6, tas ask pla planning, training, g, exp xpertise / skil skills s matrix
Closed Do Door Session #1 #1 – Co
Communication, Plan lanning, g, Sch Scheduling, g, Del Delegation
Chris is De DeLuis – ch
changes s to
ASA, A, 21 21J app approac ach and and foc
s on
Agreements
Clayton Hu Hugh ghes es – Ins
nstalled pe performance, rea ealities s of
Approvals, s, ed education is is the key – tal alk to the LAM LAMEs s and and he help us us exp xplain
ea Wadsworth – Sea
Seat Lad Lady covered – con
siderations s for
s to
dynamic sea seats, s, testing, standards to consider, benefits of dynamic seats, considering ‘family’ of seats, SRP, BFM
David id Gill ill – The ne
new Par art 23 23, , pe performance base based rul ule, ch changes s to
help reduce ce certifi fication cos
s for
smal aller air aircraft, secr secret is is up up-front agr agreement with ith the reg egulator, stan andards s and and com
therland – Des
Design cha change pr process review, , par part 21/43 star arting poi points, har harmonise use use of
terms s and and pr process sses is is step 1, 1, mak ake sche schedule 1 1 pu public, 33 337 7 review, ne new AC for
desi sign ch change to
incorporate gui guidance on
hanged Product Rul Rule,
process s - pla planning g + + earl early com
= min inimal al reg egulatory in involvement
Closed Do Door – Communication, be
better use use of
intelligence da data, con
com
Jack ck Stanton – Lif
Life as as an an ex-Engineer, overview of
intelligence rol
how da data is is use used no now, , wha hat CAA AA is is do doing to
ake be best use use of
safety / usag usage da data, example of
how it it all all work
s, overview of
wha hat is is hap happening in in the sec sector
Ben Vos – Dam
Damage tol
is no not avionics, s, overview of
siderations s for
metallic and and com
site structures, s, loa load pa path con
siderations, s, key dif differences be between fix fixed-wing and and rotary
Johnson – we
e ar are lis listening bu but we e ha have a a lim limited reso esource and and ou
primary tas ask is is pu public sa
smar arter and and together is is the key
end more e tim time physicall lly in in you
egion
e CA CAA in intelli elligence to
iden enti tify fy and align lign areas of
eed with ith capacity
iew 43-9 to
clarify fy DD DDH & IA IA role les, pot
ial 337 Form update
Consider in intr troduction of
guid ideli lines for
classification of
Avi vionic ics in installa lation in install llations
ind was to
ise e ou
Deli liver more tr training
view th the e task pri riorit itisati tion process and be e more tr transparent
Late, e, in incomple lete, poo
ly com
ill go
the e bot
the e pile ile
Consider apprentices or
change programs
Improve in inter er-governmental l com
Engage e with ith Ca Calla llaghan
intain in inter ernational agr greemen ents ts and com
rt 23 roadshow – FAA gu guest speaker
possible
routine applications
development
together
Although we are all sitting in the Aviation Safety canoe, we will get to our destination faster if we all paddle together and in the same direction