Data Presentation Fall Ed Affairs 2016 Terms Cohort Data students - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

data presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Data Presentation Fall Ed Affairs 2016 Terms Cohort Data students - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Data Presentation Fall Ed Affairs 2016 Terms Cohort Data students who are educated at the same period of timea grade level or class of students HUP Historically Under Performing (Special Education, English Language


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Data Presentation

Fall Ed Affairs 2016

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Terms

  • Cohort Data – students who are educated at the same period of time—a

grade level or class of students

  • HUP – Historically Under Performing – (Special Education, English Language

Learners, Economically Disadvantaged)

  • PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System - PVAAS is a

statistical analysis of Pennsylvania (PA) state assessment data, and provides Pennsylvania districts and schools with growth data to add to achievement data.

  • SPP – School Performance Profile - a school level academic score for public

schools, that includes indicators for Academic Achievement, Closing the Achievement Gap, Academic Growth, other academic indicators

SPP - http://paschoolperformance.org/FAQ

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3-4 Elementary Key Points

  • Areas of strength
  • Scores for ELA, Math and Science are above the state average range from 4%

to 12%

  • 3rd grade Math scores saw a 9% increase between 2015 and 2016
  • 4th Grade ELA had the highest number of students scoring advanced
  • Areas of Concern
  • Scores from 2015-2016 in 3rd and 4th grades decreased in ELA
  • 21% of Cohort Math students moved out of advanced
  • Achievement gap between black and white students of 26% in ELA and 31% in

Math in 2016

  • 1. Data points from www.education.pa.gov provide additional

analysis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EL ELA and math Ac Achievement Summary

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (year ar-ov

  • ver-ye

year)

2015 Overall ELA 656 6 23 44 27 71

  • 61

10% 2016 Overall ELA 672 8 25 43 24 67

  • 60

7%

2015 Overall Math

656 16 24 29 32 61

  • 47

14%

2016 Overall Math

685 18 21 31 31 62

  • 50

12%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sc Science Achievement Su Summary

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (year ar-ov

  • ver-ye

year)

District Yr/Yr Chg. State

2015 G4 Science 333 4% 9% 36% 51% 86% 77% 9% 2016 G4 Science 354 8% 9% 31% 52% 83%

  • 3%

76% 7% 2015 G8 Science 320 13% 17% 36% 34% 70% 59% 11% 2016 G8 Science 333 20% 20% 28% 32% 60%

  • 9%

58% 3% 2015 Overall Science 653 9% 13% 36% 43% 78% 68% 10% 2016 Overall Science 687 14% 14% 30% 43% 72%

  • 6%

67% 5%

Prof + Advanced

  • Diff. District
  • v. State

n= Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

slide-6
SLIDE 6

EL ELA Achievement Mobility Tree Chart

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 3-4 4 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=1 1% n=48 30% n=57 n=51 89% n=3 11% n=24 33% n=160 n=87 54% n=6 11% n=9 33% n=73 n=46 63% n=24 15% n=0 0% n=27 n=15 56% n=2 3% n=1 1% n=0 0% 1% 33% 33% 56% 63% 3%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

11%

Proficient Advanced

2016 30% 15% 54% 2016 2016 2016 89% 11% 1% 0%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ma Math Achievement Mo Mobility Tre ree Chart rt

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 3-4 4 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=3 4% n=27 30% n=90 n=71 79% n=2 3% n=22 30% n=91 n=51 56% n=19 21% n=18 28% n=74 n=37 50% n=12 13% n=0 0% n=64 n=44 69% n=12 16% n=1 1% n=0 0% 4% 28% 30% 69% 50% 16%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

3%

Proficient Advanced

2016 30% 13% 56% 2016 2016 2016 79% 21% 1% 0%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ELA 2015-2016 PSSA (3-4 Cohort Data)

69.4 55.4 72.2 84.6 70.5 57.5 83.3 83.1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Math 2015-2016 PSSA (3-4 Cohort Data)

65 51 79 83 63 49 75 80

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5-6 Elementary Key Points

  • Areas of strength
  • Increase in math from 48% to 52.5%
  • ELA 65% Proficiency in 5th Grade
  • ELA 60.2% Proficiency in 6th Grade
  • Overall Math scores were 10% higher than the state average
  • Areas of Concern
  • No Change ELA 15 to 16
  • ELA 26% of advanced students dropped to Proficient
  • Math 26% of Basic students dropped to Below Basic
  • Achievement gap between black and white students of 25% in ELA and 31% in

Math in 2016

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ac Achievement Summary

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (year ar-ov

  • ver-ye

year)

School Yr/Yr Chg. State

2015 G5 ELA 329 12% 25% 47% 17% 64% 62% 2% 2016 G5 ELA 322 9% 26% 47% 18% 65% 1% 62% 3% 2015 G6 ELA 347 7% 32% 37% 24% 61% 60% 1% 2016 G6 ELA 331 8% 31% 43% 18% 60%

  • 1%

62%

  • 2%

2015 Overall ELA 676 9% 28% 42% 21% 62% 60% 2% 2016 Overall ELA 653 9% 29% 45% 18% 62% 0% 60% 2%

School Yr/Yr Chg. State

2015 G5 Math 329 19% 31% 29% 20% 49% 42% 7% 2016 G5 Math 325 23% 24% 28% 25% 53% 4% 44% 9% 2015 G6 Math 346 20% 34% 29% 17% 45% 39% 6% 2016 G6 Math 331 24% 25% 24% 27% 51% 6% 41% 10% 2015 Overall Math 675 20% 33% 29% 18% 47% 40% 8% 2016 Overall Math 656 24% 24% 26% 26% 52% 5% 42% 10%

n= n=

  • Diff. District
  • v. State
  • Diff. District
  • v. State

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Basic Below Basic Proficient Advanced Prof + Advanced Prof + Advanced

slide-12
SLIDE 12

EL ELA Achievement Mobility Tree Chart

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 5-6 6 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=0 0% n=18 13% n=50 n=37 74% n=0 0% n=17 23% n=139 n=95 68% n=13 26% n=16 46% n=73 n=54 74% n=25 18% n=0 0% n=35 n=19 54% n=2 3% n=1 1% n=0 0% 0% 46% 23% 54% 74% 3%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

0%

Proficient Advanced

2016 13% 18% 68% 2016 2016 2016 74% 26% 1% 0%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Ma Math Achievement Mo Mobility Tre ree Chart rt

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 5-6 6 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=1 1% n=27 32% n=62 n=55 89% n=0 0% n=19 21% n=85 n=48 56% n=7 11% n=13 23% n=90 n=47 52% n=10 12% n=0 0% n=57 n=44 77% n=23 26% n=0 0% n=0 0% 1% 23% 21% 77% 52% 26%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

0%

Proficient Advanced

2016 32% 12% 56% 2016 2016 2016 89% 11% 0% 0%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ELA 2015-2016 PSSA (5-6 Cohort Data)

69.4 55.4 72.2 84.6 70.5 57.5 83.3 83.1

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Math 2015-2016 PSSA (5-6 Cohort Data)

52.3 34.7 79.2 70.6 55.6 40.3 79.2 71.5

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-16
SLIDE 16

7-8 Middle School Key Points

  • Areas of strength
  • 7th Grade 66% Proficiency in ELA
  • 8th Grade 60.5% Proficiency in ELA
  • 5% Higher than State in Science
  • Areas of Concern
  • 12% decrease in ELA proficiency in 2016
  • ELA 32% of advanced students dropped to Proficient
  • Math 24% of Basic students dropped to Below Basic
  • Achievement gap between black and white students of 32% in ELA and 40% in

Math in 2016

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ac Achievement Summary

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (year ar-ov

  • ver-ye

year)

District Yr/Yr Chg. State

2015 G7 ELA 344 3% 33% 42% 22% 64% 59% 5% 2016 G7 ELA 333 4% 31% 43% 22% 65% 2% 62% 4% 2015 G8 ELA 321 5% 23% 48% 24% 72% 59% 13% 2016 G8 ELA 336 9% 31% 41% 19% 60%

  • 12%

58% 1% 2015 Overall ELA 665 4% 28% 45% 23% 68% 60% 8% 2016 Overall ELA 669 6% 31% 42% 21% 63%

  • 5%

60% 2%

District Yr/Yr Chg. State

2015 G7 Math 345 22% 38% 26% 14% 40% 33% 7% 2016 G7 Math 336 31% 28% 23% 18% 41% 1% 37% 4% 2015 G8 Math 323 21% 31% 28% 19% 48% 30% 18% 2016 G8 Math 341 31% 27% 26% 16% 42%

  • 6%

31% 11% 2015 Overall Math 668 22% 35% 27% 16% 44% 40% 4% 2016 Overall Math 677 31% 28% 24% 17% 42%

  • 2%

42%

  • 1%

n= n=

  • Diff. District
  • v. State
  • Diff. District
  • v. State

Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced Basic Below Basic Proficient Advanced Prof + Advanced Prof + Advanced

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

EL ELA Achievement Mobility Tree Chart

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 7-8 8 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=0 0% n=14 11% n=71 n=48 68% n=0 0% n=17 19% n=130 n=86 66% n=23 32% n=3 25% n=91 n=61 67% n=29 22% n=0 0% n=12 n=9 75% n=13 14% n=1 1% n=0 0% 0% 25% 19% 75% 67% 14%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

0%

Proficient Advanced

2016 11% 22% 66% 2016 2016 2016 68% 32% 1% 0%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ma Math Achievement Mo Mobility Tre ree Chart rt

2015 2015-2016 2016 PSSA (gr grade ade 7-8 8 coho hort)

Up 2+ Levels Up 1 Level Same Down 1 Level Down 2+ Levels 2015 2015 2015 2015 n=0 0% n=0 0% n=18 23% n=42 n=36 86% n=1 2% n=20 17% n=79 n=56 71% n=6 14% n=8 13% n=117 n=69 59% n=4 5% n=0 0% n=62 n=53 85% n=28 24% n=1 1% n=0 0% 0% 13% 17% 85% 59% 24%

Year-to-Year Change: Below Basic Basic

2015 PSSA Level:

2%

Proficient Advanced

2016 23% 5% 71% 2016 2016 2016 86% 14% 1% 0%

slide-21
SLIDE 21

ELA 2015-2016 PSSA 7-8 Cohort Data)

66.9 50.6 94.7 89.8 62.8 49.4 84.2 81.6

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Math 2015-2016 PSSA 7-8 Cohort Data)

40.4 22.9 63.2 68.8 45.6 30.2 68.4 69.8

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

All Black Asian White 2015 2016

slide-23
SLIDE 23

7th and 8th Grade Keystones Data

2.9 3.3 11.5 7.4 29.9 32.6 47.4 21.5 67.2 64.1 41 71.2 97.1 96.7 88.5 92.6 SPRING 2013 SPRING 2014 SPRING 2015 SPRING 2016 % Best Below Basic % Best Basic % Best Proficient % Best Advanced Best % At/Above Proficient

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cedarbrook MS Algebra 1 Keystone Data Analysis

88.2 92.5 92.1 87.9 73.6 ​, 87.7 94.4 91.7 96.3 96.2 20 40 60 80 100 120 152 160 38 24 53 57 18 24 81 79 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2015 ALL HUP Black Asian White

Axis Title

7th and 8th Math by Demographic

slide-25
SLIDE 25

2015 2015-2016 2016 PS PSSA County Rankings Al All Grades 3rd

rd – 8t

8th Eng English h Lang ngua uage Arts, Mathe hematics & Scienc nce

Language Arts: 18th out of 20 Districts Math: 15th out of 20 Districts Science: 13th out of 20 Districts

slide-26
SLIDE 26

2015 2015-2016 2016 PS PSSA County Rankings by by Grade de Eng English h Lang ngua uage Arts, Mathe hematics & Scienc nce

Language Arts: 3rd Grade: 17th 4th Grade: 17th 5th Grade: 18th 6th Grade: 18th 7th Grade: 18th 8th Grade: 18th Math: 3rd Grade: 14th 4th Grade: 15th 5th Grade: 17th 6th Grade: 17th 7th Grade: 17th 8th Grade: 12th Science: 4th Grade: 18th 8th Grade: 18th

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2015 2015-2016 2016 SPP Co County Rankings by by Scho hool

Elementary SPP Rankings:

  • Glenside Elementary 45 out of 94
  • Wyncote Elementary 54 out of 94
  • Cheltenham Elementary 62 out of 94
  • Myers Elementary 83 out of 94
  • Elkins Park Elementary 91 out of 94

Middle and High School SPP Rankings:

  • Cedarbrook Middle School 20 out of 31
  • Cheltenham High School 19 out of 22
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cheltenham High School Key Points

  • Areas of strength
  • Algebra 1 Scores increased across all sub groups
  • Biology Scores increased across all sub groups
  • Areas of Concern
  • ELA had no significant increase or decrease
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Algebra 1 Keystone Data Analysis

49% 31% 30% 77% 78% 73% 57% 56% 90% 84% ALL HUP AA WHITE ASIAN

2015-2016 Algebra 1

2015 2016

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Biology Keystone Data Analysis

57% 34% 42% 84% 77% 77% 70% 59% 93% 100% ALL HUP AA WHITE ASIAN

2015-2016 Biology

2015 2016

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Literature Keystone Data Analysis

71% 53% 56% 91% 91% 75% 53% 62% 93% 87% ALL HUP AA WHITE ASIAN

2015-2016 Literature

2015 2016

slide-32
SLIDE 32

2015 2015-2016 2016 Keystone Co County y Ranki kings Eng English h Lang ngua uage Arts, Al Alge gebra 1 and Biology gy

Literature: 20th out of 26 High Schools Algebra 1: 19th out of 26 High Schools Biology: 20th out of 26 High Schools Literature: 16th out of 26 High Schools Algebra 1: 16th out of 26 High Schools Biology: 18th out of 26 High Schools

HUP All Students

slide-33
SLIDE 33

SPP Scores

  • Decreases in SPP for all schools from 2014 to 2016 accept for the High

School, which stayed the same

slide-34
SLIDE 34

School Performance Profile

2015-2016 SPP Scores Glenside: 77.5

Wyncote: 75.0 Cheltenham: 72.2 Myers: 68.2 Elkins Park: 60.0 Cedarbrook: 65.8 High School: 77.2

2013-2014 SPP Scores Glenside: 90.9 Wyncote: 87.6 Cheltenham: 80.3 Myers: 85.1 Elkins Park: 72.0 Cedarbrook: 91.3 High School: 77.0

2014-2015 SPP SCORE: HIGH SCHOOL: 66.5

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Glenside Elementary

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Wyncote Elementary

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Cheltenham Elementary

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Myers Elementary

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Elkins Park Elementary

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Cedarbrook Middle School

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Cheltenham High School

No new slide yet

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Resources:

  • Data points from www.education.pa.gov provide additional analysis
  • SPP data http://www.paschoolperformance.org/