Councillors Workshop 29 th May 2019 Thames-Coromandel SMPs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE 1

Councillors Workshop 29th May 2019 Thames-Coromandel SMPs Governance and Engagement

SMP Consortium - Royal HaskoningDHV, CMC and Streamlined

SLIDE 2

Who are the SMP team?

Stakeholders / Councillors

TCDC Project Director [Mo Imtiaz] RHDHV Project Director TCDC Project Manager [Jan van der Vliet] RHDHV Project Manager [Dan Messiter] Project Co-ordinator [Nick Lewis] NZ Technical Lead [Sian John] NZ Project Co-ordinator [Tom FitzGerald] CORE TEAM

[Tom FitzGerald] Consultation & Engagement Lead I [Dr Jarrod Walker] Environment & Cultural, Marine & Water Quality Lead [Greg Guthrie] Climate Change Adaptation Lead I [Allan Young] Planning & Consenting Lead

OTHER LEADS

Coastal Processes I Coastal Science I Coastal and Flood Risk Modelling I Ecology I Geotechnical

WIDER TEAM ADDITIONAL RESOURCES [300 plus]

SLIDE 3

Workshop Objectives

Introductions Obtain an understanding of what is important Obtain support for the approach proposed to engagement, and specifically Phase 1 engagement, with the community and mana whenua Seek initial views on the criteria to be adopted for the SMP risk assessment process Approach  interactive

SLIDE 4

Core Principles

4

The aim of ‘shoreline management planning’ is to establish a sustainable framework for risk management at the coast, that provides resilience and addresses immediate issues in a longer-term context

It should consider the full extent of its area of interest in an integrated manner This needs to build from the aspirations and concerns of communities and stakeholders

The ‘plan’ should represent the long-term vision for the wider study area; ‘adaptive policies’ are the means of achieving this plan at a local level

• ver discrete timescales

SMPs have to be: realistic; far sighted; encompassing and inclusive; seeking

• pportunities alongside identifying constraints

now and in the future

SLIDE 5

SMP Process (1 of 2)

Scope

• Baseline data collation and evaluation
• Identification of knowledge gaps
• Initial engagement [ongoing throughout]

Hazards

• Derivation of hazard predictions for local infrastructure, land-use

and private assets

• Evaluation of asset management data

Risks

• Development of draft coastal management units
• Development of a risk profile based upon hazards, uncertainty and

land-use

SLIDE 6

SMP Process (2 of 2)

Options

• Development of a range of management options based upon risks

and values

• Evaluation of options against policy; local priorities; costs and risks

Plan

• Refinement of coastal management units = draft SMP!
• Presentation of management options to Council, the community,

stakeholders and iwi

SMPs

• Evaluation of feedback and incorporation into the preferred plan
• Agreement of the plan outcomes and adoption of the TCDC SMPs!

SLIDE 7

SMP Programme

Phase 1

Scoping

Year 1: 1st 6 months April to Sept 2019

Phases 2 & 3

Hazard and Risk Analysis State of Environment Report Year 1: 2nd 6 months

Phase 4

Development

• f Resilient

Community Action Plans Year 2

Phase 5

Resource Consent and Asset Legalisation Year 3

Phase 6

TCDC SMPs

End of Year 3 May 2022

Implement

SLIDE 8

Lessons Learnt – UK and NZ

SLIDE 9

Hawkes Bay Coastal Hazard Strategy

Developed as a ‘pilot’ to test and refine the MfE Guidance - DAPPs ✓ Established a ‘Joint Committee’ between District Councils, mana whenua groups and regional council.

• Community Panels based on cells

SLIDE 10

Kāpiti Coast District Council

✘ Issue with Council perceived to be ‘rushing’ – coastal hazard LIMs placed on 1800 properties ‘without consultation’ Need for robust, peer reviewed science to inform discussion

J O E L M AXWE L L

Coastal rules axed from plan

L a st u p d a t e d 9 : 57 31 / 7 / 20 1 4

P a r t s

• f

K a p i t i ' s d e v e l

• p

me n t r u l e b

• k

w o n ' t b e c

• mp

l e t e d t i l l 20 20 a s t h e c

• u

n c i l r e b

• t

s i t s t r

• u

b l e d d i st r i c t p l a n . O n T h u r sd a y c

• u

n c i l l

• r

s v

• t

e d t

• k

e e p t h e p l a n , u n d e r r e v i e w si n c e 20 8 , b u t d u mp t h r e e se c t i

• n

s a n d r e v i se c

• n

t e n t i

• u

s r u l e s. T h e d e c i si

• n

h a s me t c a u t i

• u

s c

• mmu

n i t y su p p

• r

t . T h e p l a n se t s r u l e s c

• v

e r i n g e v e r y t h i ng f r

• m

ma x i mu m f e n c e h e i g h t s t

• w h

e r e h

• me

s, b u si n e sse s a n d f a c t

• r

i e s a r e a l l

• w e

d , a n d w i l l r e g u l a t e h u n d r e d s

• f

mi l l i

• n

s

• f

d

• l

l a r s

• f

d e v e l

• p

me n t . O n T h u r sd a y c

• u

n c i l l

• r

s v

• t

e d u n a n i mo u sl y t

• su

p p

• r

t a n

• p

t i

• n

t h a t w i l l k e e p t h e p r

• p
• se

d p l a n b u t r e d r a f t c

• n

t e n t i

• u

s p r

• v

i si

• n

s a nd d u mp t h r e e se c t i

• n

s c

• mp

l e t e l y . T h e p r

• p
• se

d d i st r i c t p l a n w e n t

• u

t f

• r

c

• n

su l t a t i

• n

i n 20 1 2 a n d w a s sl a mme d b y su b mi t t e r s

• v

e r a r a f t

• f

c h a n g e s i n c l u d i ng n e w n

• b

u i l d z

• n

e s f

• r

b e a c h f r

• n

t p r

• p

e r t i e s. T h e b a c k l a sh sa w t h e c

• u

n c i l c

• mmi

ssi

• n

t w o r e v i e w s c

• v

e r i n g t h e c

• a

st a l sc i e n c e b e h i n d t h e b e a c h f r

• n

t c

• n

t r

• l

s, a nd t h e e n t i r e p l a n

• st

a l l i n g h e a r i n g s p l a n n e d f

• r

l a st y e a r . Co a st a l r u l e s i n t h e p l a n w e r e b a se d

• n

t h e f i n d i n g s

• f

t h e 20 1 2 Sh a n d r e p

• r

t c

• mmi

ssi

• n

e d b y t h e c

• u

n c i l . T h e r e p

• r

t i n c l u d e d h a z a r d l i n e s sh

• w i

n g 1 b e a c h f r

• n

t p r

• p

e r t i e s w e r e a t r i sk f r

• m

e r

• si
• n

a n d f l

• d

i n g w i t h i n 50 y e a r s a n d a n

• t

h e r 8 w i t h i n a c e n t u r y . I n M a r c h , a sc i e n t i f i c p a n e l f

• u

n d t h e Sh a n d r e p

• r

t w a s n

• t

su f f i c i e n t l y r

• b

u st t

• b

e u se d f

• r

t h e d i st r i c t p l a n . T h e n i n Ap r i l t h e r e v i e w

• f

t h e e n t i r e d i st r i c t p l a n r e c

• mme

n d e d t h e p l a n b e k e p t b u t t h e c

• u

n c i l sp e n d a y e a r b r i n g i n g i t u p t

• sc

r a t c h b e f

• r

e l a u n c h i n g h e a r i n g s. O n T h u r sd a y c

• u

n c i l l

• r

s v

• t

e d t

• b

e g i n t h e

• f

f i c i a l p r

• c

e ss

• f

d u mp i n g t h e c

• a

st a l p r

• v

i si

• n

s

• t

h e l a st r i t e s

• n

t h e Sh a n d r e p

• r

t

• n

c e b a c k e d t

• t

h e h i l t b y st a f f a n d mo st c

• u

n c i l l

• r

s. M e a n w h i l e i n M a r c h t h e c

• u

n c i l a n n

• u

n c e d i t s n e w e n v i r

• n

me n t a l p l a n n i n g ma n a g e r Da r r y l L e w , w h

• w o

u l d h a v e t h e j

• b
• f

r e n e w i n g t h e d i st r i c t p l a n r e v i e w.

SLIDE 11

Proposed approach to Governance and Engagement

SLIDE 12

Why engage…and who with?

Adapting to coastal change is complex, contested and must ensure long-term resilience

SLIDE 13

Communications and Engagement Strategy

Developed in conjunction with the TCDC Governance and Strategy team – finalised September 2019 Will set out:

• approach to both communications AND engagement in detail

(see Attachment B)

• a robust governance framework

Our approach needs to:

• stand the test of time – create ownership, link with existing

governance and the decision-making cycle, be accessible, relevant & transparent, inform and be informed by community and be inclusive to build and maintain trust

SLIDE 14

Possible Governance Framework

SLIDE 15

Nominated Community Members

COASTAL PANEL

All Community Board Members Kaitiaki Forum

iwi groups Core Members: Mana whenua + TCDC + WRC

SMP Joint Committee

SMP PROGRAMME OFFICE

Council + RHDHV Secretariat and Technical Support

Coastal Panels

Workshops – detailed consideration of local issues – development of adaptation pathways

SLIDE 16

Iwi outreach

Invite to partner Governance and kaitiaki forum Korero - what is important Alignment of values and knowledge systems Build relationship and trust SMP reflecting Maori values

• Ngāi Tai ki Tamaki
• Ngāti Hako
• Ngāti Hei
• Ngāti Maru
• Ngati Pāoa
• Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki
• Ngāti Pūkenga
• Ngāti Rāhiri Tumutumu
• Ngāti Tamaterā
• Ngāti Tara Tokanui
• Ngāti Whanaunga
• Te Patukirikiri

SLIDE 17

Auckland Climate Action Plan - Iwi directives

Tamaki examples

SLIDE 18

SLIDE 19

SMP Hazard & Risk Assessment

The definition of hazards and the risk to communities/ assets  engineering / science Respective management options will be evaluated against:

• regional and national policy guidance; planning rules
• district and local priorities and policy direction
• resilience principles
• community values and cultural context
• life cycle costs and risks
• timeframes

Will inform the identification and prioritisation of proposed management units and the areas at the greatest risk

SLIDE 20

SLIDE 21

SLIDE 22

Next Steps

Community and key stakeholder engagement – June to August 2019 Agree structure for Governance – Sept 2019 Agree Communication and Engagement Strategy – Sept 2019 Seek views on SMP risk assessment criteria – Sept 19 Outputs from Scoping – October 2019