Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9 Conflict - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

conflict termination and prevention
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9 Conflict - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Conflict Termination and Prevention September 3 - Class 9 Conflict Termination Over half of all conflicts end in military victory for one side. Those that are not require other means of settlement. Negotiated Settlements Both


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Conflict Termination and Prevention

September 3 - Class 9

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Conflict Termination

  • Over half of all conflicts

end in military victory for

  • ne side.
  • Those that are not

require other means of settlement.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Negotiated Settlements

  • Both sides must
  • vercome the

challenge of commitment problems to settle for peace.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Solving commitment problems?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Solving commitment problems?

  • Walter: No insurance

against cooperation after war ends.

  • Third-party guarantor

required to ensure that both sides abide to the agreement and to prevent cheating.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Walter’s test

DV? IV? What test does she use?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Spoilers can derail agreements

  • Spoilers are actors in civil

conflicts that can upend negotiations and ensure conflict continues.

  • Ex: Hamas in the 1990s, IRA

splinters in 1998.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stedman: Three types of spoilers

Limited spoilers -- want specific grievances addressed before agreement is signed. Ex: RPF in Rwanda in 1993.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Greedy Spoilers

Upend agreements to get a better deal. Solution: threaten to end negotiations altogether. Ex: RENAMO in Mozambique in 1992.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Total Spoilers

  • Radicals. Don’t want
  • negotiations. All or nothing.

Solution: Coercion or elimination.

  • Ex. UNITA in Angola 1992
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Potential Problems with Peace Settlements

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Potential Problems with Peace Settlements

  • Used by one conflict actor to gain advantage
  • ver another.

○ Ex. Tajikistan, Angola.

  • Spoilers could be mischaracterized, either

excluding or including them.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How to prevent conflict?

  • Peacekeepers
  • Power Sharing
  • Power Division
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Peacekeeping (Fortna)

  • Can ensure compliance or

end ongoing conflicts. Why does peacekeeping appear ineffective? Why does peacekeeping work?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Power Sharing

  • Can stabilize post-conflict environment.
  • Proportional distribution of:

○ Legislative seats. ○ Administrative appointments ○ Armed forces membership ○ Territorial Autonomy

  • Exs: Bosnia, El Salvador.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Power Dividing

  • Previous conflict antagonists are delegated

veto roles in government:

○ Rotating presidency. ○ Judiciary or ombudsman delegated to minority group. ○ PM must be from certain group.

  • Ex: Lebanon:

○ President is Christian, PM is Sunni, Speaker of Parliament is Shia.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Problems with conflict prevention?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Problems with conflict prevention?

  • Peacekeepers have limited ability to stop

conflict recurrence.

○ Ex: Rwanda.

  • Power sharing can be subverted by majority.

○ Ex: Tajikistan.

  • Power dividing can create deadlock.

○ Ex: Lebanon.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Discussion

What is the most effective method of conflict prevention? Can future conflicts be prevented?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Northern Ireland - Good Friday Agreement

Final Case

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Background

  • Conflict in stalemate

throughout 1980s and 1990s.

  • IRA conducts bombing

campaign of England in early 1990s.

  • Tony Blair seeks talks.
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Good Friday Agreement

  • Agreed to by UK, Ireland, Sinn Fein and

DUP.

  • Ends hostilities. Creates consociational

system: both Unionists and Republicans must be in government.

  • Equality of citizenship. Devolution of power

for UK.

  • Police reform. Prisoner release.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Overcoming Challenges

What were challenges to peace? How were the challenges overcome? What are some lingering problems?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Is the Good Friday Agreement a good model?

Is it applicable to other cases (i.e. Syria)? What are some potential issues with cross- country application?