comparison of many categories in
play

Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Model for Structure-based Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer 1,2 , H. Piringer 2 , W. Berger 2 , M. E. Grller 1 1 Institute of Computer Graphics & Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology, Austria 2


  1. A Model for Structure-based Comparison of Many Categories in Small-Multiple Displays J. Kehrer 1,2 , H. Piringer 2 , W. Berger 2 , M. E. Gröller 1 1 Institute of Computer Graphics & Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology, Austria 2 VRVis Research Center, Vienna, Austria

  2. Comparison of Multi-variate Data Categorical & numerical attributes Example: sales data Dimensions (categorical) Geographic region Product category Product split by Timestamps categories Ship date Order date Measures (numerical) Profit Sales Johannes Kehrer 2

  3. Small-multiple Displays Comparison by juxtaposition Ineffective with many categories Precise comparison when aligned Johannes Kehrer 3

  4. Visual Comparison [Gleicher et al. 2011] Compare to 2010 Overlay (superposition) Explicit encoding Johannes Kehrer 4

  5. Visual Comparison [Gleicher et al. 2011] Compare to 2010 Overlay (superposition) Explicit encoding Johannes Kehrer 5

  6. Many Options for Comparison Compare to maximum Compare East to West Compare years to 2010 Compare each year to previous one Compare quarters to average per year Johannes Kehrer 6

  7. Model for Structure-based Comparison Geographic region: Year: Quarter: Formalism to define references (what-to-what) B ased on hierarchical structure of display Comparison within/across hierarchy levels Johannes Kehrer 7

  8. Table Algebra [Stolte et al. 2002] Display configuration from cross/nest operator {West, East} x {2010, 2011, 2012} x {Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4} x {Furniture, Office Suppl.} / (East, 2010, Q3, Furniture, Tables) {Tables, Bookcases, Paper, Envelopes, Appliances} Johannes Kehrer 8

  9. Our Model: Absolute vs. Relative Comparison Compare to 2010 Compare to next year Johannes Kehrer 9

  10. Roles of Dimensions Comparing dimensions relate different categories (e.g., years) Refining dimensions relate equivalent categories (e.g., quarters) Compare to next year Johannes Kehrer 10

  11. Absolute Reference Specification Reference n -tuple r abs = {r 1 , r 2 , …, r n } where ( r i = ø) ʌ ( r i ∈ dimension i ) n … number of dimensions r abs = {ø, Q3 , ø, ø} year product quarter product category Change categories where r i ≠ ø (comparing dimensions) Johannes Kehrer 11

  12. Relative Reference Specification Compare to preceding/ following category within comparing dimension Comparing dimensions need logical ordering Compare to next year Johannes Kehrer 12

  13. Relative Reference Specification Reference n -tuple r rel = {r 1 , r 2 , …, r n } where ( r i = ø) ʌ ( r i ∈ ordinal dimension i ) n … number of dimensions Increase/decrease categories where r i ≠ ø (comparing dimensions) 13 r rel = {ø, Q2 } r rel = { 2011 , ø} year quarter year quarter Johannes Kehrer 13

  14. Intermediate Aggregates (IAs) Johannes Kehrer 14

  15. Intermediate Aggregates (IAs) Johannes Kehrer 15

  16. Application Example: Parameter Space Analysis Car engine simulation Design & operating parameters Maximize torque r abs = { -30 , ø, A , ø} load IVCS A speed config. type Johannes Kehrer

  17. Application Example: Parameter Space Analysis Sensitivity wrt. design parameter r rel = { -30 , ø, ø, ø} IVCS load speed config. type Johannes Kehrer

  18. Comparison of Vessel Movement Visualization based on Kernel Density Estimates [Daae Lampe et al. 2010/2011] Peaks and changes in traffic Johannes Kehrer 18

  19. Conclusions Formal model for structure-based comparison Definition of comparisons within/across hierarchy levels Independent of type of visualization Compact specification based on reference tuple Applied in different application examples Future Work Integrated visualization of reference graph Interactive reference specification Johannes Kehrer 19

  20. Acknowledgements A. Pobitzer & O.Daae Lampe Data courtesy of Tableau Software, Inc., AVL List GmbH, HAKOM Solutions GmbH & Co KG, and Norwegian Coastal Administration Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and Austrian Funding Agency (FFG) Johannes Kehrer 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend