Characterizing Noetherian spaces as a 0 2 -analogue to compact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

characterizing noetherian spaces as a
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Characterizing Noetherian spaces as a 0 2 -analogue to compact - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Characterizing Noetherian spaces as a 0 2 -analogue to compact spaces 1 Matthew de Brecht & Arno Pauly Kyoto University Universit Libre de Bruxelles TOPOSYM 2016 1 This work was supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Characterizing Noetherian spaces as a ∆0

2-analogue to compact spaces1

Matthew de Brecht & Arno Pauly

Kyoto University Université Libre de Bruxelles

TOPOSYM 2016

1This work was supported by JSPS Core-to-Core Program, A. Advanced

Research Networks. The first author was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K15940. The second author was supported by the ERC inVEST (279499) project.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Defining Noetherian spaces

Definition

A topological space X is called Noetherian, iff every strictly ascending chain of open sets is finite.

Theorem (GOUBAULT-LARRECQ)

The following are equivalent for a topological space X:

  • 1. X is Noetherian, i.e. every strictly ascending chain of open

sets is finite.

  • 2. Every strictly descending chain of closed sets is finite.
  • 3. Every open set is compact.
  • 4. Every subset is compact.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Defining Noetherian spaces

Definition

A topological space X is called Noetherian, iff every strictly ascending chain of open sets is finite.

Theorem (GOUBAULT-LARRECQ)

The following are equivalent for a topological space X:

  • 1. X is Noetherian, i.e. every strictly ascending chain of open

sets is finite.

  • 2. Every strictly descending chain of closed sets is finite.
  • 3. Every open set is compact.
  • 4. Every subset is compact.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Relevance

Noetherian spaces occur as

◮ spectra of Noetherian rings. ◮ Alexandrov topology of well-quasi orders.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Relevance

Noetherian spaces occur as

◮ spectra of Noetherian rings. ◮ Alexandrov topology of well-quasi orders.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Relevance

Noetherian spaces occur as

◮ spectra of Noetherian rings. ◮ Alexandrov topology of well-quasi orders.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Quasi-Polish spaces

Definition

A countably-based space is quasi-Polish, if its topology is induced by a Smyth-complete quasi-metric.

Proposition (de Brecht)

A locally compact sober countably-based space is quasi-Polish.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Quasi-Polish spaces

Definition

A countably-based space is quasi-Polish, if its topology is induced by a Smyth-complete quasi-metric.

Proposition (de Brecht)

A locally compact sober countably-based space is quasi-Polish.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

When is a Noetherian space quasi-Polish?

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a sober Noetherian space X:

  • 1. X is countable.
  • 2. X is countably-based.
  • 3. X is quasi-Polish.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Baire Category Theorem in quasi-Polish spaces

Theorem (HECKMANN; BECHER & GRIGORIEFF)

Let X be quasi-Polish. If X =

i∈N Ai with each Ai being Σ0 2,

then there is some i0 such that Ai0 has non-empty interior.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

When is a quasi-Polish space Noetherian?

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a quasi-Polish space X:

  • 1. X is Noetherian.
  • 2. Every ∆0

2-cover of X has a finite subcover.

Corollary

A Noetherian quasi-Polish space is TD iff it is finite.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

When is a quasi-Polish space Noetherian?

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a quasi-Polish space X:

  • 1. X is Noetherian.
  • 2. Every ∆0

2-cover of X has a finite subcover.

Corollary

A Noetherian quasi-Polish space is TD iff it is finite.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Represented spaces and computability

Definition

A represented space X is a pair (X, δX) where X is a set and δX :⊆ NN → X a surjective partial function.

Definition

F :⊆ NN → NN is a realizer of f : X → Y, iff δY(F(p)) = f(δX(p)) for all p ∈ δ−1

X (dom(f)). Abbreviate: F ⊢ f.

NN

F

− − − − → NN   δX   δY X

f

− − − − → Y

Definition

f : X → Y is called continuous, iff it has a continuous realizer.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Represented spaces and computability

Definition

A represented space X is a pair (X, δX) where X is a set and δX :⊆ NN → X a surjective partial function.

Definition

F :⊆ NN → NN is a realizer of f : X → Y, iff δY(F(p)) = f(δX(p)) for all p ∈ δ−1

X (dom(f)). Abbreviate: F ⊢ f.

NN

F

− − − − → NN   δX   δY X

f

− − − − → Y

Definition

f : X → Y is called continuous, iff it has a continuous realizer.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Represented spaces and computability

Definition

A represented space X is a pair (X, δX) where X is a set and δX :⊆ NN → X a surjective partial function.

Definition

F :⊆ NN → NN is a realizer of f : X → Y, iff δY(F(p)) = f(δX(p)) for all p ∈ δ−1

X (dom(f)). Abbreviate: F ⊢ f.

NN

F

− − − − → NN   δX   δY X

f

− − − − → Y

Definition

f : X → Y is called continuous, iff it has a continuous realizer.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The various classes of spaces

Represented spaces QCB0-spaces ∼ = admissibly represented spaces Quasi-Polish spaces Polish spaces

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Cartesian closure

Observation

We can form function spaces (to be denoted by C(−, −)) in the category of represented spaces by the UTM-theorem/

Definition

Let S = ({⊤, ⊥}, δS) be defined via δS(p) = ⊥ iff p = 0N.

Definition

The space O(X) of open subsets of X is obtained from C(X, S) via identification.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cartesian closure

Observation

We can form function spaces (to be denoted by C(−, −)) in the category of represented spaces by the UTM-theorem/

Definition

Let S = ({⊤, ⊥}, δS) be defined via δS(p) = ⊥ iff p = 0N.

Definition

The space O(X) of open subsets of X is obtained from C(X, S) via identification.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cartesian closure

Observation

We can form function spaces (to be denoted by C(−, −)) in the category of represented spaces by the UTM-theorem/

Definition

Let S = ({⊤, ⊥}, δS) be defined via δS(p) = ⊥ iff p = 0N.

Definition

The space O(X) of open subsets of X is obtained from C(X, S) via identification.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Compactness in synthetic topology

Definition

Call a represented space X compact, if isFull : O(X) → S is continuous.

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a represented space X:

  • 1. X is compact.
  • 2. For any represented space Y, the map

∀ : O(X × Y) → O(Y) mapping R to {y ∈ Y | ∀x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Compactness in synthetic topology

Definition

Call a represented space X compact, if isFull : O(X) → S is continuous.

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a represented space X:

  • 1. X is compact.
  • 2. For any represented space Y, the map

∀ : O(X × Y) → O(Y) mapping R to {y ∈ Y | ∀x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

∆0

2-truth values

Definition

Let the represented space S∇ have the points {⊤, ⊥} and the representation ρ(w0ω) = ⊥ and ρ(w1ω) = ⊤.

Definition

We can represent the ∆0

2-subsets of X via their continuous

characteristic functions C(X, S∇).

slide-23
SLIDE 23

∆0

2-truth values

Definition

Let the represented space S∇ have the points {⊤, ⊥} and the representation ρ(w0ω) = ⊥ and ρ(w1ω) = ⊤.

Definition

We can represent the ∆0

2-subsets of X via their continuous

characteristic functions C(X, S∇).

slide-24
SLIDE 24

∇-compactness

Definition

Call a represented space X ∇-compact, if isFull : ∆0

2(X) → S∇

is continuous.

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a represented space X:

  • 1. X is ∇-compact.
  • 2. For any represented space Y, the map

∀ : ∆0

2(X × Y) → ∆0 2(Y) mapping R to

{y ∈ Y | ∀x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

  • 3. For any represented space Y, the map

∃ : ∆0

2(X × Y) → ∆0 2(Y) mapping R to

{y ∈ Y | ∃x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

∇-compactness

Definition

Call a represented space X ∇-compact, if isFull : ∆0

2(X) → S∇

is continuous.

Theorem

The following are equivalent for a represented space X:

  • 1. X is ∇-compact.
  • 2. For any represented space Y, the map

∀ : ∆0

2(X × Y) → ∆0 2(Y) mapping R to

{y ∈ Y | ∀x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

  • 3. For any represented space Y, the map

∃ : ∆0

2(X × Y) → ∆0 2(Y) mapping R to

{y ∈ Y | ∃x ∈ X (x, y) ∈ R} is continuous.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The main result

Theorem

A quasi-Polish space is Noetherian iff it is ∇-compact.

Definition

Let C(X) denote the space of constructible subsets of X.

Lemma

Let X be a Noetherian Quasi-Polish space. Then id : ∆0

2(X) → C(X)∇ is well-defined and continuous.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The main result

Theorem

A quasi-Polish space is Noetherian iff it is ∇-compact.

Definition

Let C(X) denote the space of constructible subsets of X.

Lemma

Let X be a Noetherian Quasi-Polish space. Then id : ∆0

2(X) → C(X)∇ is well-defined and continuous.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

The main result

Theorem

A quasi-Polish space is Noetherian iff it is ∇-compact.

Definition

Let C(X) denote the space of constructible subsets of X.

Lemma

Let X be a Noetherian Quasi-Polish space. Then id : ∆0

2(X) → C(X)∇ is well-defined and continuous.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The preprint

  • M. de Brecht. & A. Pauly.

Noetherian Quasi-Polish Spaces. arXiv 1607.07291, 2016.