cag concerns regarding proposed energy research park
play

CAG Concerns Regarding Proposed Energy Research Park Gratiot - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CAG Concerns Regarding Proposed Energy Research Park Gratiot County, MI CAG General Meeting June 21, 2006 What Do We Know At Present? 2 Sets of investors looking at alternative energy park in/around Alma region 1 investment would be


  1. CAG Concerns Regarding Proposed Energy Research Park Gratiot County, MI CAG General Meeting June 21, 2006

  2. What Do We Know At Present? • 2 Sets of investors looking at alternative energy park in/around Alma region • 1 investment would be Ethanol Plant – Local (state-wide) investors – Utilizing corn locally grown and processed – $ in the millions/tens of millions • 1 Investment would be clean coal plant with alternative energy research – Out-of-state investors – $ in the billions

  3. CAG’s Concerns • Support local economy and monitor the environment at the same time • Learn from our past • Maintain a strong, working relationship with both industry and regulators along with maintaining strong ties with all of our representatives - federal/state/local • Maintain a focus on wellness and sustainability whenever we approach a situation

  4. Brief Discussion of the Pros and Cons of Ethanol and Clean Coal Facilities

  5. Ethanol - Basic Facts • Ethanol (ethyl alcohol) is a combustible liquid made from the fermentation and distillation of plant material - starches/sugars • Ethanol is added to gasoline to increase oxidation (raise octane rating) for slower, cleaner burn • Ethanol can be made from a variety of plant materials (mostly corn) and therefore is a renewable fuel • Cars CANNOT run on pure ethanol at present

  6. Ethanol - Basic Facts • 30% of gas supply has ethanol blend • 13% of corn grown in U.S. went to ethanol manufacturing in 2005 • Other ethanol stock: sorghum, some grasses, grain and ‘biofuels’ such as corn stalks, vegetable matter • Wet and dry mill processes available: – Wet mill - produces products in addition to ethanol such as corn gluten, corn meal, corn oil, corn syrup – Dry mill - produces mostly ethanol and feed for cattle

  7. Ethanol - Dry Mill Plants

  8. Ethanol - Pros • Renewable fuel • Extends gasoline supplies • Makes gasoline burn ‘much’ cleaner • Highly biodegradable - all aspects of process • Can be utilized right now in cars and trucks • Is good for Michigan and particularly Gratiot County as this county produces more corn/acre than anywhere else in state • With more research, may be solution to bio-matter waste disposal

  9. Ethanol - Cons • Objectionable odor during processing • Uses large volumes of water • Some air contaminants are produced including: – VOCs – Nitrous oxides – Methane – CO • Will require air and water permits from MDEQ

  10. Ethanol - Economically Viable? • David Pimentel from Cornell University says: – Energy in ≠ energy out – For ethanol to become a ‘substitute’ for gas, 97% of all farmland would need to grow corn • So…how can ethanol be profitable? – Large government subsidies for farmers – Large government subsidies for alternative energy implementation

  11. Clean Coal Technology Integrated Gasification and Carbon Cycling IGCC

  12. IGCC vs. Traditional Coal • How is “coal” technology ‘alternative?’ – Coal is not burned as in traditional coal plants – Hydrogen is produced and captured – Main problem contaminants in traditional coal plants are captured (some sold as by-products) before entering the environment - including sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides, mercury • Traditional coal is pulverized and burned to create steam --> turn a turbine --> generate electricity

  13. IGCC Removal of Sulfur and Mercury / nitrous oxides Pressure + Steam Expanding syngas burned + Heat breaks down Turns turbine and heats Coal to CO, Syngas, H Water producing steam

  14. IGCC - Pros • Uses a fossil fuel that is “plentiful” in the U.S. • Produces significantly less particulate and other air pollutants than traditional coal burning plants • Is much more efficient than traditional coal burning plants (42% and maybe as high as 60% in future) • Uses about 40% less water than a traditional coal burning plant • Produces 20% less carbon dioxide • More expensive per Kwh than traditional coal burning but cheaper than natural gas plants • Carbon dioxide sequestration is possible and CO 2 waste can be utilized in oil recovery

  15. IGCC - Cons • Still produce enough air pollutants to warrant permits including: nitrous oxides, particulates and CO • Noisy • A little higher cost per Kwh than traditional coal burning plants but can be competitive if working with other energy sources • Slag produced is inert but needs to be disposed of or reused • Trucking coal slurry in and waste sulfur and mercury out presents risk

  16. Proposed CAG Agenda Work With Our Strengths • Stay in touch with investors, city officials, county officials and state and federal representatives on this issue • Establish working relationship based on the model CAG has developed with regulatory agencies, industry and government • Maintain relationship with academic community (Alma College) to emphasize alternative energy research and reduce environmental impact • Learn from our past and promote environmental stewardship, planning and sustainability

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend