BC Pension Leadership Forum The Pension Policy Agenda for Canada - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bc pension leadership forum the pension policy agenda for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BC Pension Leadership Forum The Pension Policy Agenda for Canada - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BC Pension Leadership Forum The Pension Policy Agenda for Canada Maurice Parent, FCIA FSA Partner February 22, 2018 Pension Plan Funding Challenges Three simple questions Question 1: Which challenges? Question 2: What has been done in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

BC Pension Leadership Forum The Pension Policy Agenda for Canada

Maurice Parent, FCIA FSA Partner February 22, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pension Plan Funding Challenges

Three simple questions… Question 1: Which challenges? Question 2: What has been done in Quebec? Question 3: What’s next?

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Which challenges?

Low interest rates Significant solvency deficits Volatility of contributions Minimum funding and benefit security trade-off Level of cost and risk sharing Equity Governance

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What has been done in Quebec?

New legislation for all types of plans

  • Municipal sector
  • University sector
  • Multi-employer plans
  • Target benefit plans (pulp and paper industry only)
  • Private sector
  • Member-funded pension plans

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What has been done in Quebec?

  • Changes to accrued benefits:

Municipal sector: Active members assumed 45% to 50% of their accrued going-concern deficit and elimination of automatic indexation University sector: Reduction required under certain circumstances MEPPs: Reduction if negotiated contributions below minimum funding requirement All sectors: Termination of employment benefit equal to solvency commuted value multiplied by solvency ratio (optional in some cases)

5

Note: The information presented is a high level summary which does not reflect various technical and transitional provisions.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What has been done in Quebec?

Changes to funding requirements:

Elimination of requirement to fund solvency deficit Funding based on GC plus an explicit PfAD (between 5% and 20%) GC deficit paid over 10 years in private sector Municipal and university sectors:

  • Service cost and future deficits shared 50/50
  • Limit set on current service cost

6

Note: The information presented is a high level summary which does not reflect various technical and transitional provisions.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What’s next?

Legislation for TBPs (except BC and AB) Pension reforms in most provinces Revision of multi-jurisdictional agreement Mandatory adoption of a funding policy for all pension plans in Quebec Possible changes to commuted value basis determined by CIA for TBPs

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What’s next?

Elements to be considered by stakeholders

Protection of accrued benefits Governance Respect of bargaining process Complexity is expensive

8