Baryonic effects on dark matter and cosmological probes - How will - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

baryonic effects on dark matter
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Baryonic effects on dark matter and cosmological probes - How will - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Baryonic effects on dark matter and cosmological probes - How will we get the accuracy required? Matthieu Schaller - Leiden Observatory Movie by R. Crain The EAGLE simulations EAGLE quick introduction 100 3 Mpc 3 simulation with 210 6 M


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Baryonic effects on dark matter and cosmological probes

  • How will we get the accuracy required?

Matthieu Schaller - Leiden Observatory

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Movie by

  • R. Crain
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The EAGLE simulations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

EAGLE quick introduction

  • 1003 Mpc3 simulation with 2×106 M☉

gas mass resolution (SPH).

  • Resolving the warm ISM phase with

the hydrodynamics solver.

  • Sub-grid model for galaxy formation

calibrated to match:

○ The z=0 stellar mass function. ○ The z=0 galaxy mass-size relation. ○ The z=0 BH mass - stellar mass relation.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Many results

Schaye+15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

A personal favourite

Trayford+16

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Things to improve in the future

Schaye+15 Crain+17

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Get your own EAGLE @ home

McAlpine+16

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Effects of baryons on dark matter

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Halo profiles

Schaller+15

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Halo profiles

Schaller+15

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Halo profiles

Schaller+15

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Halo profiles

Schaller+15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Does it look realistic?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What about the dark matter itself?

Schaller+15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Implication for DM searches

Credit: NASA, Fermi

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Schaller+16

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Constraints assuming a decay channel

Calore+17

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Obs. constraints on DM slope?

Newman+13

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cluster profiles

Schaller+16b

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Total matter profile

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Dark matter profiles

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Self-interacting dark-matter?

Robertson+18

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Or could the analysis be “wrong” ?

Quihan+(in prep)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Effects on the halo masses

Schaller+15

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Effects on cosmological probes

slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Baryon effects

Paillas, MS+2019

slide-29
SLIDE 29

In terms of power-spectrum

Hellwing, MS+2016

slide-30
SLIDE 30

From raw data to cosmology

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Weak-lensing forecast

Sembolini+2014

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Do we need bigger runs?

Thinking of future weak-lensing surveys:

  • Measure some cosmological information on scales down to

~ 1-30 Mpc. Clearly “baryon effects” seen on these scales.

  • “Common wisdom” asks for volume in excess of 300 Mpc.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Cosmological scales in hydro runs?

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Do we need bigger runs?

Thinking of future weak-lensing surveys:

  • Measure some cosmological information on scales down to

~ 1-30 Mpc. Clearly “baryon effects” seen on these scales.

  • “Common wisdom” asks for volume in excess of 300 Mpc.
  • That asks for particles counts > 45003 ~ 100 billion (@ EAGLE res.).
  • > With EAGLE code that would be >300M CPU hours and 1.3PB of RAM
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Future with the SWIFT code?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

SWIFT principles

  • Fully open-source cosmological simulation software for the

community.

  • Testable, designed to easily manage multiple schemes,

subgrid models, physics problems.

  • Scalable, fast and exploiting the latest hardware using modern

algorithm.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Under the hood

  • Using task-based parallelism, modern algorithms, better

parallelisation and domain decomposition we get an order of magnitude speed-up over Gadget on representative problems.

  • Leaner memory footprint, faster i/o, more modular, multiple

hydro schemes.

  • Collaboration with computer scientists and industry.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Task-based parallelism in action

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Some physics

  • Hydro neighbour finding based on regular AMR cell
  • structure. Many flavours of SPH + “GIZMO”.
  • 5th order FMM for gravity with a multipole-mesh method

for periodic gravity.

  • Particles sorted to enhance the vectorization of the code.
  • Activation of work only in the “active” parts of the tree.
slide-40
SLIDE 40

FMM principles

slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Planet formation - Tilt of Uranus

Kegerreis+2019

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Cosmological simulations

DM-only simulation. 8003 Mpc3 volume. 15363 particles. 4 computing nodes. 4 days of wall-clock time.

slide-44
SLIDE 44
slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Same with hydro-dynamics

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Some conclusions

  • Mock observations are crucial to shed light on the nature of dark matter.
  • Constraining baryonic effects (feedback) is crucial to exploit next-generation

cosmology probes.

  • Larger simulation with wider parameter space are a key tool on this path.
  • The SWIFT code enables such simulations.

Come and play with it!

slide-48
SLIDE 48

SPH With Interleaved Fine-grained Tasking Full source code, examples, documentation & tutorials:

www.swiftsim.com @SwiftSimulation

slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51

Example Plot

  • Wow
  • Such
  • Results
  • Colours:

○ Blue: #298BDF ○ Dark Blue: #145289 ○ Orange: #DF4229 ○ Dark Orange: #90382B

Use a text box with 14 pt. Roboto Bold for Captions.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

SWIFT Template

When using this template, you may notice the ‘extra’ image around the edge of the slides. Leave this be -- it avoids things looking weird at the edges of your slides when presenting.

  • Bullet Points
  • Make Slides
  • Great Again