Awareness Raising of Child to Parent Violence for Practitioners in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

awareness raising of child to parent violence for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Awareness Raising of Child to Parent Violence for Practitioners in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Awareness Raising of Child to Parent Violence for Practitioners in Ireland Evidence from Research Child t o Parent Violence: European Perspect ives Sallis Benney Theat re, Universit y of Bright on, England 29 t h January 2015 With


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Awareness Raising of Child to Parent Violence for Practitioners in Ireland– Evidence from Research

Child t o Parent Violence: European Perspect ives Sallis Benney Theat re, Universit y of Bright on, England 29t h January 2015

With financial support from the DAPHNE Programme of the European Union.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presenters

Eileen Laust er, RCPV Proj ect Research Assist ant Fellow, Nat ional Universit y of Ireland, Galway Declan Coogan, Lect urer in S

  • cial Work,

S chool of Polit ical S cience & S

  • ciology,

Nat ional Universit y of Ireland Galway, RCPV Proj ect Lead in Ireland

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Tuning In… .Aims

 Int roduct ions  R

eview of Child t o Parent Violence

 Prevalance abroud and in Ireland  Int roduct ion t o t he Non Violent R

esist ance Programme

 R

esearch Met hodology

 R

esearch R esult s

 R

esearch Anaylsis

 Key learning and Messages

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Responding to Child to Parent Violence Proj ect

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Where does child to parent violence take place?

 Across all socio-economic and cult ural groups

 (Avrahim-Krehwinkel & Aldridge 2010; Omer 2004, 2011;

Laust er et al 2014)

 S

  • me families develop repeat ed pat t erns of

int eract ion t hrough conflict which leads t o recurrent cycles of violence.

 Mot hers parent ing alone following exit from domest ic

violence.

 (Omer 2004, Omer & Weinblat t 2008, Coogan 2012, Coogan &

Laust er 2014).

 Two parent families –

  • ft en well educat ed and middle

class, wit h “ over ent it led” children

 (Gallagher 2004, 2008, 2014).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Is there a lot of child to parent violence in families?

 Figures vary but some argue 18%

  • f t wo

parent and 29%

  • f one parent families

 (Walsh & Krienert 2009)

 Pagani et al (2009) - among 15/ 16 year olds,

12.3%

  • f males and 9.5%
  • f females were

physically aggressive t owards t heir fat hers in t he previous six mont hs.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Prevalence from Research in Ireland

 Approximat ely, how many families do you current ly

work wit h? Mean 17.28 St d Deviat ion 12.53

 In how many of t he families t hat you have ident ified

above are t here concerns about violence by anyone in t he family? 8.19 St d Deviat ion 9.10

 In how many of t he families t hat you have ident ified

above are t here concerns about violence by children/ young person in t he family? 3.86 St d Deviat ion 4.50

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Approx. Number of Families
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Families Experiencing Violence

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Families Experiencing CPV

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Core Elements of the Non-Violent Resistance Programme.

(Omer 2004; Weinblat t & Omer 2008; Coogan & Laust er 2014a, 2014b; Laust er et al 2014).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Core Elements of the Non Violent Resistance Programme.

 Commit ment .  Breaking t he escalat ion

cycle – ending behaviour pat t erns & pressing t he pause but t on.

 S

t epping out of secrecy – t he support er net work.

 Increasing parent al

presence.

 Ext ernalise t he behaviour.  Declarat ion of commit ment

t o Non Violence Resist ance.

 Non violent resist ance &

prot est – refusal of orders, service st rike, prot est sit in

 Reconciliation S

t eps - drawing out posit ive aspect s of child’s personalit y.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Goals of S elf-Efficacy Training

 Increase capacity and skills of front line workers t o recognise

and respond t o CPV .

 Ensure workers are able t o feel confident t o work in t his area.

S elf-Efficacy Training Format

 Facilit at ed by Declan Coogan alone or wit h Eileen Laust er.  Used short present at ions of t opics followed by small group

discussions and role plays wit h an emphasis on CBT , solut ion focused t herapy and syst emic t echniques.

 Solicit ed quest ions oft en and provided an overall posit ive

experience for t rainees. (see WS4 for Training Evaluat ions).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Research Methodology

 Number of t rainings  Pre-Training, Post -Training and Follow-up Int erviews  Number of complet ed quest ionnaires  Descript ion of Quest ionnaires  Percent ages of males and females  Educat ion levels  Experience post lat est qualification

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Research Methodology

 Number of t rainings- S

ix t rainings from July 2013 t o S ept . 2014 all held in Ireland on t he Non Violent Resist ance programme.

 Number of complet ed quest ionnaires- 145 people at t ended one

  • r bot h days of t he t raining and of t hese 140 complet ed S

elf- Efficacy Quest ionnaires 1 and/ or 2. Of t hese, 110 at t endees complet ed bot h Quest ionnaires 1 and 2.

 Percent ages of males and females- 80%

females and 20% males.

 Educat ion levels- Cert ificat e 9%

, Degree 26% , Post graduate Diploma 30% , Mast ers 26% , PhD 2% , Ot her 7% .

 Experience level post lat est qualificat ion- Newly qualified 5%

, Two t o Five years 17% , S ix t o Twelve years 38% , Over Twelve years 40% .

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Questions Format and Reliability

 Descript ion of Quest ionnaires- The first 42 quest ions in

Quest ionnaire 1 and 2 are ident ical. They are Likert scaling quest ions for a st at ement rat ed 1-S t rongly Agree, 2-Agree, 3- Neit her Agree nor Disagree, 4-Disagree, and 5-S t rongly Disagree.

 Grouping of Quest ions and Cronback’s Alpha result s- Worker

Confidence Levels wit h Parent s- .762, Worker Confidence Levels wit h Children/ Y

  • ung People- .761, Worker S

kill Levels wit h Parent s- .808 and Worker S kill Levels wit h Children/ Y

  • ung

People- .792.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Research Analysis

 Any missing dat a for each quest ion was discarded. The paired T-Test

was performed in SPSS. Of t he 28 quest ions t hat were analysed, 25 had st at ist ically significant result s. This means t hat t he overall increase in ranking scores for each of t he four headings was not due t o chance.

 The first quest ion was not found t o be st at ically significant . We

believe it was due t o it being worded in t he negat ive.

 The ot her t wo quest ions t hat were not st at ist ically significant were

in t he Confidence wit h Working wit h Children Sect ion. We believe t his was due t o t he NVR programme focus on working wit h parent s and not young people in part icular. Therefore, many of t hose at t ending eit her work or have an int erest primarily wit h parent s and less int erest or experience working wit h young people.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Follow Up Interviews Results

 There were 10 Follow-Up Int erviews wit h pract it ioners held

t hree or more mont hs aft er t hey had at t ended t he t raining

 S

even of t he t en pract it ioners implement ed t he NVR programme wit h parent s in t heir workplace in t he int ervening period

 The remaining t hree pract it ioners said t hey would have liked t o

implement t he t raining; however t hey had not encount ered any referrals relat ing t o CPV prior t o t he Follow-Up Int erviews.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Key Learning & Messages

The t raining in t he Non Violent Resist ance programme developed and implement ed by t he RCPV proj ect increased pract it ioner awareness and underst anding of child t o parent violence;

The t raining programmes developed and implement ed by t he RCPV Proj ect increased pract it ioner self-efficacy;

The t raining programmes developed and implement ed by t he RCPV Proj ect provided pract it ioners wit h t he relevant skills t o work wit h parent s and children when child t o parent violence t akes place;

The RCPV S elf Efficacy Quest ionnaires are st at ist ically reliable measurement s/ t ools t hat can be used in fut ure research;

The fact t hat request s for RCPV t raining exceeded t he resources of t he proj ect t o provide t he t raining wit hin t he lifespan of t he proj ect highlight s t he fact t hat child t o parent violence is a growing social problem and t here is a high demand for t he pract it ioner t raining packages t hat were developed as part of t he Proj ect .

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Key Learning & Messages (con’ t)

 As t he Proj ect is making t he t raining and research resources

freely available via t he end of proj ect conference and t he www.rcpv.eu websit e, furt her t raining and research should be provided t o t rack t he development of pract ice, policy and research responses t o t his problem.

 Fut ure research could explore parent / carer self-efficacy in

relat ion t o responding t o child t o parent violence.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

More Information

  • n the RCPV Proj ect and

Child to Parent Violence

www.rcpv.eu www.cpvirelrand.ie

slide-22
SLIDE 22

References

Coogan, D & Laust er (2014a) Rest oring Compet ence & Confidence – Non Violent Resist ance as a Response t o Child t o Parent Violence in Ireland. Cont ext – t he Magazine for Family Therapy and S yst emic Pract ice in t he UK.

  • Vol. 132, April 2014: 29-31.

Coogan D & Laust er, E (2014b) Non Violent Resist ance for Pract it ioners – Responding t o Child t o Parent Violence in Pract ice. NUI Galway/ RCPV Proj ect .

Coogan (2012) Marking t he Boundaries – When t roublesome becomes abusive and children cross t he line in family violence. Feedback – Journal of t he Family Therapy Associat ion of Ireland. Summer 2012: 74-86.

Coogan, D (2011) Child t o Parent Violence: Challenging Perspect ives on Family

  • Violence. Child Care in Pract ice. Vol. 17, No. 4: 347-358.

Gallagher, E 2004a Parent s Vict imised by t heir Children, Aust ralia New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy (ANZJFT), Vol. 25, No1: 1-12.

Gallagher, E 2004b Y

  • ut hs who Vict imise t heir parent s. ANZJFT

, Vol. 25, Vol. 2: 94- 105.

Laust er, E, Quinn, A, Brosnahan, J & Coogan, D (2014) Pract ical S t rat egies for Coping wit h Child-t o-Parent Violence: The Non Violent Resist ance Programme in Pract ice. Irish Probat ion Journal. Vol. 11, Oct ober 2014: 208-221.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References

Omer, H (2004) Nonviolent Resist ance – A New Approach t o Violent and S elf - Dest ruct ive Children. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge Universit y Press.

Pagani, L, Tremblay, R E, Nagin, D, Zoccolilo, M, Vit aro, F , McDuff, P (2009) Risk Fact or Models for Verbal and Physical Aggression t owards Fat hers. Journal of Family Violence. Vol. 24: 173- 182.

Walsh, J A & Krienert , J L (2007) Child-Parent Violence: An Empirical Analysis of Offender, Vict im and Event Charact erist ics in a Nat ional S ample of Report ed Incident s. Journal of Family Violence. Vol. 22: 563-574.

Walsh, J A & Krienert , J. L (2009) A Decade of Child-Init iat ed Family Violence: Comparat ive Analysis of Child-Parent Violence and Parricide Examining Offender, Vict im and Event Charact erist ics in a Nat ional S ample of Report ed Incident s 1995-

  • 2005. Journal of Int erpersonal Violence. Vol. 24 No.9: 1450-1477.

Weinblat t , U & Omer, H (2008) Nonviolent resist ance: a t reat ment for parent s of children wit h acut e behaviour problems. Journal of Marit al and Family Therapy,

  • Vol. 34. No. 1, 75-92.