Applied Learning as a Best Practice Model A Strategy for Higher - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

applied learning as a best practice model
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Applied Learning as a Best Practice Model A Strategy for Higher - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Applied Learning as a Best Practice Model A Strategy for Higher Education Student Success Michele K. Wolff Shannon M. Tinney University of Maryland, Baltimore County Special thanks to Robert Williams and Jung Byun for their data assistance, as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Applied Learning as a Best Practice Model

A Strategy for Higher Education Student Success

Michele K. Wolff Shannon M. Tinney University of Maryland, Baltimore County Special thanks to Robert Williams and Jung Byun for their data assistance, as well as Miryn Alcantara for her graphical technical assistance.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background & Context… …The Good

What is Applied or Experiential Learning?

  • Activities that engage the learner directly in the

phenomena being studied and are associated with structured reflection on the connection between the phenomena and theoretical concepts (Kendall, 1990, 181).

  • Viewed as pedagogy; practical application of resources;

mechanism for citizenship development

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background & Context… Benefits of this approach

  • Increased student exposure, awareness,

understanding of traditions and cultures different from their own

  • Students as creators of knowledge
  • Skill acquisition and development
  • Increased interest and excitement about

learning

  • Supports research and teaching of faculty
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background & Context…

Which of the following activities is not traditionally viewed as applied learning?

Internship Cooperative Education Performance Research Resident Hall Assistant Service-Learning Study Abroad

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background & Context… …The Bad: Higher Education Student

Persistence: Is There a Problem?

approximately

50%

  • f students who

enter college to earn a bachelor's degree fail to complete their degree in 6 years

82% 55% 63%-66% 70%-72% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% FIRST YEAR RETENTION 6-YR GRADUATION NATIONAL/PEER UMBC

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Making The Bad Not See So Bad Reframing Retention & Graduation Rates

Student Success Focuses on Strategies to:

  • Prevent departure/attrition
  • Promote overall success developmentally and

academically

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Student Involvement Theory

What is student involvement? “The amount of physical and psychological energy that the student devotes to the academic experience” (Astin, 1984).

A Theoretical Perspective

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Student Involvement Theory

  • What is Astin’s Student Involvement

Theory? The greater a student’s involvement, the greater his/her level of personal development and student learning (or higher levels of affective and cognitive development)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Student Involvement Theory Postulates and Assumptions

Involvement Cognitive Outcomes Policy & Practices Affective Outcomes

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Theoretical Model

Applied Learning, Development & Student Success

Affective Development

+

Student Success: Persistence

+

Applied Learning Cognitive Development

+

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Applied Learning, Involvement & Student Success

Special Programs Exploratory Study: The effect of applied learning on undergraduate retention and graduation rates

6-year Graduation Rate 45.7% 83.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Non-applied Learning Applied Learning 2-year Retention Rate 70.2% 88.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Non-applied Learning Applied Learning

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Research Questions

  • What is the impact of different types of applied

learning on seniors’ affective & cognitive development?

  • How is student development related to degree

completion?

  • What are the relationships among applied

learning, student development, and degree completion?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Methodology

  • Data & Sample

– 2004 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

  • Web-based survey administered by NSSE
  • Response rate (SR) = 36%

– Senior-level Students

  • 12 - 24 credits of graduating (n = 328)
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Methodology

Dependent Variables

  • Graduated (yes/no)
  • Time to Degree (in years at this institution)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Methodology

Independent Variables

  • Applied Learning Experiences (yes/no)

– Professional practice – Community service – Research – Study abroad program – Service-learning

  • Multiple applied learning experiences
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Methodology

Mediating Variables

  • Cognitive Development (α = .88; 10 items )
  • Affective Development (α = .84; 6 items)
  • Principal components factor analysis and

reliability analysis were conducted for each scale

  • Mean scaled scores were created
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Methodology

Control Variables

  • Student Demographics

– Gender – Race – Non-traditional college student (> 25 yrs.) – First-generation college – Enrollment status (FT/PT) – Transfer student – Major program area (STEM v. non-STEM) – Dorm resident – In-state residency – Cumulative GPA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Bivariate Relationships between Applied Learning, Student Development & Degree Completion

Affective Development Cognitive Development Graduated Time to Degree Professional Practice

+ +

  • Community

service

+ + +

Research Study Abroad Service-learning

+

Multiple applied experiences

+ + +

  • Affective

development

  • Cognitive

development

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Multivariate Analyses

Applied Learning, Student Development & Degree Completion

  • Bivariate relationships between applied learning

and reports of cognitive & affective development remained significant when controlling for student characteristics.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Multivariate Analyses

Applied Learning, Student Development & Degree Completion

  • Senior-level students who had completed a

professional practice experience were significantly more likely to graduate in less time than seniors who reported not having completed such an experience.

  • Senior-level students who engaged in more

applied learning experiences were significantly more likely to graduate in a shorter period of time than those who did not.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Implications

Implementation & Next Steps

  • Promote the institutionalization of applied learning as part of

undergraduate education enhancement

– Creating an “honors university experience” for every student – Applied learning as graduation requirement – Effectiveness & Efficiency Initiative

  • Dissemination as a best practice for adaptation/implementation
  • f applied learning as an active learning curriculum component
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Limitations of Current Research

  • Used a sample of senior-level students
  • Focused on multi-item indicators of cognitive

and affective development instead of individual components

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Directions for Future Research

  • Incorporate Alumni Survey to enhance current

research

  • Longitudinal retention and graduation analysis
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Directions for Future Research

  • Tinto’s interactionist theory of student departure
  • Pilot study of impact of applied learning on

affiliated versus non-affiliated student success

slide-25
SLIDE 25

QUESTIONS?