3rd E2E Provisioning Workshop Prague, Czech Republic 29-30 November, 2010 Peter Szegedi, PDO szegedi@terena.org www terena org
TERENA
www.terena.org
TERENA
End-to-End (E2E) Provisioning Workshop
series 3rd workshop on
Applications and Services
Applications and Services Motivations, history 1 t E2E W 1st E2E - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
3rd E2E Provisioning Workshop Prague, Czech Republic 29-30 November, 2010 Peter Szegedi, PDO szegedi@terena.org www terena org www.terena.org TERENA TERENA End-to-End (E2E) Provisioning Workshop series 3rd workshop on Applications and
3rd E2E Provisioning Workshop Prague, Czech Republic 29-30 November, 2010 Peter Szegedi, PDO szegedi@terena.org www terena org
TERENA
www.terena.org
TERENA
End-to-End (E2E) Provisioning Workshop
series 3rd workshop on
Applications and Services
Motivations, history
1 t E2E W k h i 2008 1st E2E Workshop in 2008
1st ”Establishing Lightpaths” 1st ”Establishing Lightpaths”
› E-science applications can generate network flows measured in Gb/s, enduring hours, days or even weeks, often between a , g , y , well-defined set of nodes, and with tight constraints on quality
› The needs of such applications are best met by traffic pp y engineered point-to-point circuits, rather than best effort routed networks like the public Internet. › End-to-end lightpaths (i.e., Gigabit Ethernet circuits or even g p ( , g lambdas) are becoming very important in the service portfolios
Slide 2
End-to-end networking context
NRENs
GÉANT NREN NREN Vendors Researchers t ki
Researchers
Multi domain provisioning tools Slide 3
related topics
End-to-end networking context
Local
NRENs
admins GÉANT LAN NREN NREN LAN LAN Researchers t ki Vendors LAN
Researchers Metro LAN Third-party
Easy for user to deploy Slide 4
related topics
End-to-end networking context
Local
NRENs
admins GÉANT LAN NREN NREN LAN LAN Researchers t ki Vendors LAN
Researchers Metro LAN Third-party
Challenges on networking level / application level Slide 5
related topics
Outcome of the discussions
i t t interest areas
1. Unified/ Standardised network architectures for end-to-end provisioning p g 2. Simplicity of the provisioning processes and software tools
› Faster provisioning has still highest priority over dynamic provisioning nowadays › Fast and automated restoration of the broken connections
3. Availability of resources, especially in the last mile
› Fibre availability, Spectrum efficiency › Access technology (PONs, Ethernet-based platforms), Cost efficiency
4. Reliability of point-to-point circuits
End-to-End Provisioning W orkshop
5. Implication of end-to-end connections on security (firewalling) aspects, routing integrity and IP addressing issues 6. Operational issues: cooperation between netwrok engineers and application engineers
series
pp g
› AuthZ and AuthN, Scheduling, Fairness
7. Business models and cost analyses for end-to-end lightpaths
› Commercialization
+ 1. Facilitating tutorials on the provisioning systems' implementation Slide 6 + 1. Facilitating tutorials on the provisioning systems implementation and usage by the campuses
Outcome of the discussions
i t t interest areas
1. Unified/ Standardised network architectures for end-to-end provisioning
On-dem and I nfrastructure
p g 2. Simplicity of the provisioning processes and software tools
› Faster provisioning has still highest priority over dynamic provisioning nowadays › Fast and automated restoration of the broken connections I nfrastructure Services Provisioning W orkshop 2 0 0 9
3. Availability of resources, especially in the last mile
› Fibre availability, Spectrum efficiency › Access technology (PONs, Ethernet-based platforms), Cost efficiency
4. Reliability of point-to-point circuits
End-to-End Provisioning W orkshop
5. Implication of end-to-end connections on security (firewalling) aspects, routing integrity and IP addressing issues 6. Operational issues: cooperation between netwrok engineers and application engineers
series
pp g
› AuthZ and AuthN, Scheduling, Fairness
7. Business models and cost analyses for end-to-end lightpaths
› Commercialization
+ 1. Facilitating tutorials on the provisioning systems' implementation
Future
Slide 7 + 1. Facilitating tutorials on the provisioning systems implementation and usage by the campuses
plans…
Motivations, history
2 d E2E W k h i 2009 2nd E2E Workshop in 2009
2nd ”Provisioning E2E Services” 2nd Provisioning E2E Services
› Technical session on provisioning issues:
› End-site challenges › Ethernet based architectures › Ethernet-based architectures › IP network provisioning ”On-demand Infrastructure Services Provisioning Workshop” on Day 2
› Operational issues: p
› Service oriented approach › GÉANT and Pan-European level › NRENs level (…the missing bits)
R i l h d t ki › Regional, research and campus networking:
› Campus issues (network admins’ perspective) › Researchers’ perspective › Regional network operators’ perspective Slide 8
Outcome of the discussions
di t audience response system
Anonymous feedback
Slide 9
Outcome of the discussions
d i itt advisory committee
The group members are: P t H l b (CESNET/M k)
Public Wiki: htt // fl t /di l / 2 / https://confluence.terena.org/display/e2e/ Draft a White Paper:
Slide 10
g
Moving forward…
3 d E2E W k h i 2010 3rd E2E Workshop in 2010
3rd ”Applications and Services”
connections.
services for end-users.
pp p g
and not just edge-to-edge connection services.
understand and explain the cost implications of e2e services for
Slide 11
understand and explain the cost implications of e2e services for users.
3rd E2E Workshop
d agenda
Slide 12
Future directions
M i f l b l t ti l l Moving from global to national scale...
1-2 December 2008 7-8 December 2009 Amsterdam Amsterdam
3 d d l t k h › 3rd and last workshop:
29-30 November, 2010 Prague, Czech Republic
Slide 13
g , p
Future directions
M i f k h t t i i Moving from workshops to trainings...
› Amsterdam, 2008:
› 29 members of the mailing list › Balanced Uni, NREN, Research › 6 2 registrants of the workshop (no remote)
g › Hard to mobilise Uni’s people
› Amsterdam, 2009:
› 119 members of the mailing list 9 e be s o t e a g st › More Unis on the list (44% ) › 7 2 registrants of the workshop (of which 20 remote) › 40% overlap with the 1st workshop 40% overlap with the 1st workshop
› Prague, 2010:
› 164 members of the mailing list › 3 2 registrants of the workshop (of which 9 remote)
Slide 14
› 3 2 registrants of the workshop (of which 9 remote) › More local people!!!
Future directions
M i f k h t t i i Moving from workshops to trainings...
› It is proven that: › It is proven that:
› Attached technical workshop works › Remote participation works › Local people are interested
› Programme Committee
› Fixed set of lecturers › Agreed structure of trainings › Collection of training materials
› Tutorial programme and hands-on
› Fixed tutorial on tools (liaison with GN3, TF-NOC, GLIF, EC › Fixed tutorial on tools (liaison with GN3, TF NOC, GLIF, EC projects, NRENs) › On-line material for remote participants › Practical, hands-on training with tools › Local host’s responsibility › Local host s responsibility › Practical knowledge sharing Slide 15