Apollo Investment Corporation Investor Presentation September 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

apollo investment corporation investor presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Apollo Investment Corporation Investor Presentation September 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apollo Investment Corporation Investor Presentation September 2017 Information is as of June 30, 2017 except as otherwise noted. It should not be assumed that investments made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Apollo Investment Corporation Investor Presentation

September 2017

Information is as of June 30, 2017 except as otherwise noted. It should not be assumed that investments made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of investments in this document.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclaimers, Definitions, and Important Notes

Forward-Looking Statements We make forward-looking statements in this presentation and other filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and are generally beyond our control. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives, including information about our ability to generate attractive returns while attempting to mitigate risk. When used in this release, the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “continue,” “intend,” “should,” “may” or similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking: the return on equity; the yield on investments; the ability to borrow to finance assets; and other risks associated with changes in business conditions and the general economy. The forward-looking statements are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. Forward-looking statements are not predictions of future events. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us. Some of these factors are described in the company's filings with the SEC. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. This presentation may contain statistics and other data that in some cases has been obtained from or compiled from information made available by third- party service providers. Past Performance Past performance is not indicative nor a guarantee of future returns, the realization of which is dependent on many factors, many of which are beyond the control of Apollo Global Management, LLC (“AGM”); Apollo Investment Management, L.P.; and Apollo Investment Corporation (collectively “Apollo”). There can be no assurances that future dividends will match or exceed historic

  • nes, or that they will be made at all. Net returns give effect to all fees and expenses. Unless otherwise noted, information included herein is presented as of the date indicated on the cover page

and may change at any time without notice. Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Corporation” or “AINV” or the “Fund”) is subject to certain significant risks relating to our business and investment objective. For more detailed information on risks relating to the Corporation, see the latest Form 10-K and subsequent quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q. Financial Data Financial data used in this presentation for the periods shown is from the Corporation’s Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filings with the SEC during such periods. Unless otherwise indicated, the numbers shown herein are rounded and unaudited. Quarterly financial information about the Company refers to fiscal quarters. The Company’s fiscal year 2017 ended March 31, 2017. AUM Definition Assets Under Management (“AUM”) refers to the investments AGM manages or with respect to which it has control, including capital it has the right to call from its investors pursuant to their capital commitments to various funds. AGM’s AUM equals the sum of: (i) the fair value of its private equity investments plus the capital that it is entitled to call from its investors pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments plus non-recallable capital to the extent a fund is within the commitment period in which management fees are calculated based on total commitments to the fund; (ii) the net asset value of AGM’s capital markets funds, other than certain senior credit funds, which are structured as collateralized loan obligations or certain collateralized loan obligation and collateralized debt obligation credit funds that have a fee generating basis other than mark-to-market asset values, plus used or available leverage and/or capital commitments; (iii) the gross asset values or net asset values of AGM’s real estate entities and the structured portfolio vehicle investments included within the funds AGM manages, which includes the leverage used by such structured portfolio vehicles; (iv) the incremental value associated with the reinsurance investments of the portfolio company assets that AGM manages; and (v) the fair value of any other investments that AGM manages plus unused credit facilities, including capital commitments for investments that may require pre-qualification before investment plus any other capital commitments available for investment that are not otherwise included in the clauses above. AGM’s AUM measure includes AUM for which it charges either no or nominal fees. AGM’s definition

  • f AUM is not based on any definition of AUM contained in its operating agreement or in any of its Apollo fund management agreements. AGM considers multiple factors for determining what

should be included in its definition of AUM. Such factors include but are not limited to (1) its ability to influence the investment decisions for existing and available assets; (2) its ability to generate income from the underlying assets in its funds; and (3) the AUM measures that it uses internally or believes are used by other investment managers. Given the differences in the investment strategies and structures among other alternative investment managers, AGM’s calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations employed by other investment managers and, as a result, this measure may not be directly comparable to similar measures presented by other investment managers. 1

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Market Opportunity
  • Investment Strategy
  • Portfolio Review
  • Conclusion
  • Appendices

2

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

Overview

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction to Apollo Investment Corporation (“AINV”)

4

(1) On a fair value basis. (2) As of June 30, 2017. (3) Apollo Investment Management, L.P. (4) See definition of AUM at beginning of presentation. (5) MidCap Financial refers to MidCap FinCo Limited, a private limited company domiciled in Ireland, and its subsidiaries, including MidCap Financial Services, LLC. MidCap Financial is managed by Apollo Capital Management, L.P., a subsidiary of Apollo Global Management, LLC, pursuant to an investment management agreement between Apollo Capital Management, L.P. and MidCap FinCo Designated Activity Company. (6) On March 29, 2016, the Company received an exemptive order from the SEC permitting greater flexibility to participate in co-investment transactions with certain of its affiliates where terms other than price and quantity are negotiated, subject to the conditions included therein.

Middle Market Lender Competitive Advantages Externally Managed by Apollo Global Management

Apollo Affiliation

  • Apollo affiliation provides

significant benefits

  • Large and diverse direct
  • rigination team with joint front

engine across AINV & MidCap Financial (“MidCap”) (5)

  • Externally managed by an affiliate (3) of Apollo Global Management, LLC, a leading alternative asset manager with

approximately $232 billion of AUM (2) (4) with expertise in private equity, credit and real estate

  • Apollo Global Management, LLC was founded in 1990
  • Publicly traded (NASDAQ: AINV) business development company (“BDC”) treated as a regulated investment

company (“RIC”) for tax purposes

  • Primarily provides debt solutions to U.S. middle market companies with a focus on direct origination
  • Since IPO in April 2004 and through June 30, 2017, invested $17.3 billion in 409 portfolio companies
  • $2.42 billion investment portfolio across 84 companies (average portfolio company investment $28.8 million) and 23

different industries, spanning a broad range of asset types (1) (2) Exemptive Relief to Co-Invest (6)

  • Expected to improve AINV’s

competitive positioning

  • Expected to increase deal flow

Flexible Mandate

  • Generally able to invest in all

levels of the capital structure – flexible mandate

  • Broad product offering
  • Experienced management team
slide-6
SLIDE 6

AINV Key Differentiators

5

Large and Diverse Direct Origination Team Broad Product Offering Significant Scale Active Investor Strong External Manager Co-investment Exemptive Relief Commitment To Repurchase Stock

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Founded: 1990 AUM: $232bn Employees: 988

  • Inv. Professionals: 368

Global Offices: 16

6

(1) As of June 30, 2017. Please refer to the definition of Assets Under Management at the beginning of this presentation. Note: AUM components may not sum due to rounding.

Global Footprint Credit

$151bn AUM

  • Opportunistic buyouts
  • Distressed buyouts and debt

investments

  • Corporate carve-outs

Private Equity

$68bn AUM

  • Drawdown
  • Liquid / Performing
  • Permanent Capital Vehicles:
  • Athene -MidCap -BDCs
  • Closed-End Funds
  • Advisory

Real Assets

$13bn AUM

  • Commercial real estate
  • Global private equity and debt

investments

  • Performing fixed income

(CMBS, CRE Loans)

Firm Profile(1) Investment Approach

Value-oriented Contrarian Integrated investment platform Opportunistic across market cycles and capital structures Focus on nine core industries

Business Segments

Toronto Bethesda Chicago

New York Bethesda Los Angeles Houston Chicago Toronto Madrid London Frankfurt Luxembourg Mumbai Delhi Singapore Hong Kong Shanghai

Strong External Manager

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Apollo Direct Origination Capabilities

Premier U.S. Private Debt Platform

7

(1) As of June 30, 2017.

MidCap is a full service finance company focused on middle market senior debt ~ $7.1 Billion Portfolio (1) AINV is a business development company or “BDC” focused on middle market debt $2.4 Billion Portfolio (1)

AGM is a Leading Alternative Credit Manager with Permanent Capital Vehicles Focused on Direct Origination

+

Best-in-Class Middle Market Loan Originator

slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

Key Investment Professionals Providing Services to AINV

Total Years

  • f Work

Experience Years at Apollo

Jim Zelter Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer, Apollo Credit Chief Executive Officer of Apollo Investment Corporation 33 11 Howard Widra Global Head of Direct Origination, Apollo President of Apollo Investment Corporation 29 4 Tanner Powell Chief Investment Officer, Apollo Investment Management, L.P. 15 11 Pat Ryan Chief Credit Officer, Apollo Credit Chief Credit Officer, Apollo Investment Management, L.P. 32 2

Average Total Years of Work Experience Average Total Years at Apollo

3 Managing Directors 26 10 6 Principals 10 5 7 Junior Staff 35+ people focused on direct origination / sourcing

Direct Origination Investment Committee Underwriting Team Origination / Sourcing Team

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Co-Investment Opportunities

9

(1) On March 29, 2016, the Company received an exemptive order from the SEC permitting greater flexibility to participate in co-investment transactions with certain of its affiliates where terms other than price and quantity are negotiated, subject to the conditions included therein. (2) Through June 30, 2017.

AINV received exemptive relief from the SEC permitting it to enter into previously prohibited negotiated joint transactions with other funds / entities managed by AGM, including MidCap (1)

We believe that the scale of AINV, MidCap and other Apollo managed capital, on a combined basis, makes us one of the largest market participants uniquely positioned to make large commitments

  • We believe exemptive relief to co-invest should improve AINV’s competitive positioning

– Allows AINV to compete more on the basis of size / scale and certainty of execution, rather than simply on price – Enhances ability to originate larger transactions with the ability to hold and / or syndicate loans – Expected to increase deal flow ─ number and variety of deals – Ability to partner with MidCap which provides AINV with access to MidCap’s expertise in niche markets with high barriers to entry – Already seeing a strong pipeline of co-investment opportunities with MidCap

  • AINV does not lend to portfolio companies owned by AGM’s private equity funds
  • Since receiving the order, AINV has invested $294 million across 15 companies, pursuant to the co-

investment exemptive order (2)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

10

Market Opportunity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Compelling Market Opportunity

11

If the middle market were a stand-alone country, it would be the 3rd largest economy in the world (1) Middle Market Businesses Require Capital to Support Growth (1) (2) Significant need for refinancing of existing loans made to middle market companies; Bulk of deals come due in 2020, 2021 and 2022 (3) Significant un-invested private equity capital should translate into strong loan demand (4)

United States China U.S. Middle Market Japan Germany

42% 21% 10% 22% 5% Capital Expenditure Information Technology Acquisitions Human Resources Other

There are nearly 200,000 U.S. middle market businesses that represent one- third of private sector GDP, employing ~47.9 million people.

$553 $800

Dry Powder (Middle-market focused PE Firms) Implied potential loan demand (assuming 40% capitalization rate)

$ in billions $ in billions

$7 $18 $22 $28 $35 $29 $14 $13

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Middle Market Institutional Loan Maturities

(1) Source: National Center for the Middle Market 2Q 2017 Middle Market Indicator. (2) Chart represents capital investment allocation of U.S. middle market companies willing to invest. 67% expressed a desire to invest. (3) Middle market institutional estimated maturities. 2017 represents 3Q17-4Q17. Source: Thomson Reuters LPC. (4) Source: PitchBook US PE Middle Market Report 2017 1Q.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Bank Regulation and Related Impact

Total Number of U.S. Banks Continues to Decline (1) Leveraged Lending Guidance Banks’ Reduced Participation in Loan Market (2)

12

  • Post the Global Financial Crisis, there has been a significant impact on

traditional financing sources and the global capital markets – Banks have markedly decreased their underwriting exposure

  • Regulatory scrutiny has continued to intensify and is particularly

noticeable with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) leveraged lending guidance. Originally introduced in 2013, but has recently been more broadly enforced to reduce banks’ exposure to certain types of loans. – Impacting significant portion of high yield and loan markets

Banks’ Cautious Approach

Banks are participating in fewer junior capital transactions or syndicating increasing portions of their exposure

  • Main requirements for financial institutions underwriting leveraged

transactions include: – Leverage: cannot exceed 4x EBITDA for senior debt or 6x for total debt (including all committed capital and assuming revolvers are drawn) – Repayment: senior debt must fully amortize or total debt must be reduced by half using free cash flow within 5-7 years – Covenants: adequate covenant protections, including financial maintenance covenants – Collateral: protection against dilution, sale or exchange of collateral or cash flow producing assets

Source: (1) FDIC as of March 31, 2017 FDIC-Insured commercial banks and savings institutions. (2) S&P Global Market Intelligence. LCD’s Quarterly Leveraged Lending Review: 2Q17. (3) Non-banks includes institutional investors and finance companies.

> 40% Decline since 2000

7% 93% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2Q17 Banks & Securities Firms Non-banks (3)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Middle Market Lending Offers Better Risk-Adjusted Returns

13

Benefits Broadly Syndicated Loans Middle Market Loans Control Over Credit Documentation

 

Due Diligence Access

Partial Full

Credit Performance

Enhanced

Relationship With Borrower

Limited Comprehensive

Hold Size Flexibility / Control

 

Origination Economics

 

Premium Asset Spreads

 

Syndication Control

 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Middle market loans historically have had lower default rates and higher recovery rates than broadly syndicated loans

Control of origination for middle market loans is designed to result in better economics and risk-adjusted returns

slide-15
SLIDE 15

14

Investment Strategy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Investment Strategy

Our portfolio repositioning strategy is based on the following key principles:

  • Continue to increase exposure to “core strategies” which are:

– Senior secured traditional corporate loans sourced by Apollo’s direct origination platform with a focus on first lien and floating rate loans – First lien loans in life sciences, asset-based lending and lender finance, areas with significant barriers to entry and areas in which MidCap has expertise

  • Continue to transition away from certain existing specialty verticals (1) or “non-core strategies”,

which are higher on the risk spectrum and have more volatile returns

  • Emphasize portfolio diversification and avoid outsized single name or industry concentrations

15

(1) Oil & gas, renewables, shipping and structured credit.

With the continued successful execution of this repositioning plan, we believe that AINV should generate consistent and sustainable ROEs

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Core Strategies 59% Non-Core Strategies & Legacy 41% As of June 30, 2016 (3) Core Strategies 74% Non-Core Strategies & Legacy 26% As of June 30, 2017 (3)

Significant Progress Repositioning Portfolio

16

(1) Core strategies include corporate lending, aviation, life sciences, asset based and lender finance.(2) Non-core strategies include oil & gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities. (3) At fair value. (4) From July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (5) The Company has modified the reporting of its interest rate type information to be based on its corporate debt portfolio, exclusive of investments on non-accrual status. (6) On March 29, 2016, the Company received an exemptive order from the SEC permitting greater flexibility to participate in co-investment transactions with certain of its affiliates where terms other than price and quantity are negotiated, subject to the conditions included therein.

Deployed Significant Capital in Core Strategies (1) and Meaningfully Reduced Exposure to Non-Core (2) Strategies and Legacy Assets

As of June 30, 2017 (3) Increased exposure to first lien and floating rate debt, reduced average company exposure and benefitted from co-investment exemptive relief (5)

Improved Risk Profile / Portfolio Composition

As of June 30, 2016 (3) As of June 30, 2017 (3) First Lien Debt, as % of Total Portfolio 40% 47% Floating Rate Debt, as % of Total Portfolio (5) 77% 86% Average Company Exposure $ 32.3 million $28.8 million Co-Investments, as % of Total Portfolio (6) 0% 11%

Invested approximately $746 million in core strategies (1) (4) Reduced exposure to non-core strategies (2) and legacy assets by $434 million (4)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Corporate Lending ~ 50% ─ 60% Aircraft Leasing ~15% Existing Specialty Verticals and Other ~7% Life Sciences, Asset-Based Lending and Lender Finance ~20% to 25% Corporate Lending 51% Aircraft Leasing 19% Existing Specialty Verticals 23% Life Sciences & Asset Based 3% Other 4%

Current Portfolio Asset Mix (1)

  • Target Portfolio Asset Mix

Target Portfolio

We intend to continue to increase our exposure to senior secured loan sourced by Apollo’s direct

  • rigination team, while adding exposure in first lien loans in life sciences, asset-based lending, and

lender finance – areas with significant barriers to entry and areas in which MidCap has expertise

17

(1) As of June 30, 2017. On a fair value basis. (2) Existing specialty verticals includes oil & gas, renewables, shipping and structured credit.

(2) (2)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Comprehensive Approach to Originations

18

We believe that Apollo has one of the largest and most diverse origination teams in the marketplace covering a diverse array of end markets

Combined with the recent receipt of exemptive relief to co-invest, we believe that the Apollo platform is one that very few alternative asset managers can compete against

Financial Sponsors Origination Channels Wall Street Niche Markets

  • AINV has completed

transactions with 100+ different sponsors

  • AINV and MidCap unified calling

effort into financial sponsors

  • Ability to offer full suite of

products increases relevancy

  • Specialized industry expertise in

areas with high barriers to entry

  • AINV and MidCap specialized

teams

  • AINV has access to all MidCap

specialized teams

  • Leverage Apollo’s deep

relationship with Wall Street intermediaries

  • Apollo buying power provides

good access

  • Potential source of liquidity that

may be used to fund core investments Direct Origination

Corporate Lending Life Sciences, ABL, Lender Finance and Aviation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Apollo’s Direct Lending Suite

19

Origination Channel Asset Yield AINV MidCap Corporate Lending Senior 4% ─ 6%   Stretch Senior 6% ─ 8%   Junior 8% ─ 11%   Real Estate Lending 4.5% ─ 7.5%   Life Sciences Lending 9% ─ 12%   Asset─Based Lending 5% ─ 11%   Lender Finance 5.5% ─ 11.5%   Aircraft Leasing (1) 11% ─ 14%   Total Investments (in billions) $2.4 (2) $7.1 (2) Primary Mandate Senior and subordinated debt yielding ~ 8% to 12% Senior debt yielding ~ 5% to 8%

We believe the Apollo platform has one of the broadest suites of direct lending products in the marketplace

1 2 3 4 5 6

(1) Investment in aviation made via Merx Aviation Finance , LLC, a wholly owned portfolio company. (2) As of June 30, 2017. (3) Co-investments that are subject to the exemptive order are to be pari-passu

Occasional

  • pportunities within

certain asset classes will be suitable for both AINV and MidCap (3)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

20

Portfolio Review

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Portfolio Snapshot

Portfolio Key Statistics (1)

Investment Portfolio (2) $2.42 bn Debt Outstanding $0.92 bn Net Assets $1.48 bn Net Leverage Ratio (3) 0.62x Net Asset Value Per Share $6.73 Most Recent Quarterly Dividend (4) $0.15 per share # of Portfolio Companies 84 Weighted Average Yield (5) 10.3% % Floating Rate (2) (6) 86% Average Company Exposure (2) $28.8 mn Median Company Exposure (2) $17.2 mn Median EBITDA (4) $70 mn Net Leverage Through AINV Position (7) 5.5 x Interest Coverage (7) 2.7 x

21

(1) As of June 30, 2017. (2) On a fair value basis. (3) Net leverage ratio is defined as debt outstanding plus payable for investments purchased, less receivable for investments sold, less cash, less foreign currencies at fair value, divided by net assets. (4) On August 3, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.15 per common share to shareholders of record as of September 21, 2017 payable on October 5, 2017. (5) On total debt portfolio. At amortized cost, exclusive of investment on non-accrual status. (6) The Company has modified the reporting of its interest rate type information to be based on its corporate debt portfolio, exclusive of investments on non-accrual status. (7) Current. (8) As of September 7, 2017. (9) Most recent quarterly dividend annualized divided by share price. There can be no assurances that AINV’s dividend will remain at the current level. (10) Most recent quarterly dividend annualized divided by net asset value per share. There can be no assurances that AINV’s dividend will remain at the current level. (11) Existing specialty verticals includes oil & gas, renewables, shipping and structured credit.

Portfolio by Security Type(1) (2) Portfolio by Strategy(1) (2)

Corporate Lending 51% Aircraft Leasing 19% Existing Specialty Verticals 23% Life Sciences & Asset Based 3% Other 4% 1st Lien 47% 2nd Lien 30% Unsecured 7% Structured Products and Other 6% Preferred Equity 1% Common Equity and Warrants 9%

Market Information (8)

Market Capitalization $1.31 bn Share Price $5.98 Price-to-Book 0.89x Dividend Yield at Share Price (9) 10.0% Dividend Yield at NAV (10) 8.9%

(11)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Non-Sponsored 17% Sponsored 83% Fixed Rate Assets 14% Floating Rate Assets 86%

Portfolio Snapshot (continued)

Metals & Mining

Fixed Rate vs. Floating Rate (1) (2) (4) Sponsored vs. Non-Sponsored (1) (2) (5)

22

Portfolio by Industry (1) (2)

(1) On a fair value basis. (2) As of June 30, 2017. (3) Other consists of: Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber; Insurance; Aerospace & Defense; Utilities – Electric; Consumer Goods – Durable; Automotive; Advertising, Printing & Publishing; Food & Grocery; Hotel, Gaming, Leisure, Restaurants; Containers, Packaging & Glass; Retail; Media – Diversified & Production; and Metals & Mining. (4) The Company has modified the reporting of its interest rate type information to be based on its corporate debt portfolio, exclusive of investments on non-accrual status.. (5) The Company has modified the reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages. The reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities. (3) Business Services 21.7% Aviation and Consumer Transport 19.2% Energy – Electricity 8.6% Transportation – Cargo, Distribution 6.8% Energy – Oil & Gas 6.6% High Tech Industries 6.2% Diversified Investment Vehicles, Banking, Finance, Real Estate 4.6% Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 4.5% Manufacturing, Capital Equipment 3.1% Telecommunications 2.8% Other 15.9%

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Portfolio Concentration

Top Ten Industries (1) Average Position Size, at fair value ($ in millions)

23

(1) Top ten companies and top ten industries based on market value as of June 30, 2017.

Top Ten Portfolio Companies (1) $32.3 $31.1 $29.7 $26.9 $28.8 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17

Rank Industry Fair Value % of Portfolio 1 Business Services 524,169 $ 21.7% 2 Aviation and Consumer Transport 462,851 19.2% 3 Energy – Electricity 207,492 8.6% 4 Transportation – Cargo, Distribution 165,476 6.8% 5 Energy – Oil & Gas 159,292 6.6% 6 High Tech Industries 149,754 6.2% 7 Diversified Investment Vehicles, Banking, Finance, Real Estate 111,965 4.6% 8 Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 109,623 4.5% 9 Manufacturing, Capital Equipment 74,871 3.1% 10 Telecommunications 66,862 2.8% Top Ten Total 2,032,354 $ 84.1% Other 384,224 15.9% Total Portfolio 2,416,579 $ 100.0% Rank Portfolio Company Fair Value % of Portfolio 1 Merx Aviation Finance, LLC 462,851 $ 19.2% 2 U.S. Security Associates Holdings, Inc. 135,000 5.6% 3 Solarplicity Group Limited (f/k/a AMP Solar UK) 131,616 5.4% 4 Spotted Hawk 85,720 3.5% 5 MSEA Tankers LLC 71,432 3.0% 6 Glacier Oil & Gas Corp. (f/k/a Miller Energy Resources, Inc.) 57,968 2.4% 7 Skyline Data, News and Analytics LLC (Dodge) 53,590 2.2% 8 Access Information 50,589 2.1% 9 Maxus Capital Carbon SPE I, LLC (Skyonic) 50,053 2.1% 10 My Alarm Center, LLC 44,993 1.8% Top Ten Total 1,143,811 $ 47.3% Other 1,272,768 52.7% Total Portfolio 2,416,579 $ 100.0%

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Portfolio Company Credit Quality

Net Leverage through AINV Position

(weighted average by cost)

24

Median LTM EBITDA

($ in millions)

$66 $70 $75 $86 Jun-16 Jun-17 At Close Current 5.6 x 5.4 x 5.4 x 5.5 x Jun-16 Jun-17 At Close Current 2.5 x 2.7 x 2.8 x 2.7 x Jun-16 Jun-17 At Close Current

Source: Company data. Includes all portfolio company investments except structured products, common equities, warrants and investments on non-accrual status. Also excludes select investments where debt-to-EBITDA is not a relevant or appropriate metric, or data is not available.

Total Cash Interest Coverage

(weighted average by cost)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

AINV Investment Process

25

(1) On a fair value basis. (2) As of June 30, 2017. (3) The Company has modified the reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages. The reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities. (4) See definition of AUM at beginning of presentation.

Deal Sourcing Underwriting & Due Diligence Structuring, Pricing & Approval Portfolio Monitoring

  • Experienced investment

team

  • Ability to execute direct /

non-sponsor transactions with a focus on specialty verticals

  • Financial sponsors

− Long-term relationships − Transactions with > 100

sponsors

− 83% of corporate

portfolio is sponsor- backed (1) (2) (3)

  • Limited origination

restrictions

  • Apollo affiliation

− Coverage and

experience

− Market insights − Proprietary research − Apollo’s credit segment

AUM ~$151 billion (2) (4)

  • Risk-adjusted investment

philosophy

− Preservation of capital − Strong asset coverage

  • Extensive due diligence
  • Knowledge sharing across

Apollo platform

− Access to management

teams of private equity portfolio companies

  • Draft term sheet
  • Investment Committee

review

− Iterative process

  • Extensive quarterly

portfolio reviews

  • Internal risk rating system
  • Covenant compliance
  • Board observation rights
  • Independent third party

valuation for non-quoted investments

  • Offer to provide

managerial assistance

  • Increased monitoring of

problem investments

− Dedicated professionals

for managing problem investments

  • Watch list committee

− Weekly review of watch

list

  • Negotiate transaction

− Structuring and terms − Typical forms include:

strong covenants, collateral package, prepayment protection, Board seat or

  • bservation rights
  • Seek Investment

Committee approval

− Weekly meetings to

discuss and vote on new deals

− Comprised of senior

personnel from across Apollo Multi-Channel Sourcing Engine Focus on Risk-Adjusted Returns Protect Downside Risk Comprehensive and Regular Review and Dialogue

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Aircraft Leasing

26

(1) As of June 30, 2017. At fair value. (2) Source: Airbus. (3) Source: IATA

Favorable Industry Fundamentals

In 2012, AINV founded a wholly owned portfolio company - Merx Aviation Finance (“Merx”) - to participate in aircraft leasing. Merx currently represents 19.2% of AINV’s portfolio (1)

  • Healthy global passenger traffic expected to continue

– Since the 1970’s, air traffic has roughly doubled every 15 years (2) – During the past 20 years global passenger traffic has expanded at an average annual growth rate of 5.1%, while global GDP grew by an average annual rate of 3.7% over the same period. (3)

  • Global fleet growth
  • Strong demand for leased aircraft driven by

movement of aircraft off of airlines’ balance sheets to lessor balance sheets

  • Rational OEM supply
  • Long technology cycles
  • Airlines prospering
  • Traditional capital providers to the space (other than

new deliveries) have been pulling back

  • Lack of central clearinghouse for aircraft trading

causes market to be inefficient

  • High barriers to entry

Investment Thesis / Strategy

  • Focus on the most liquid and in-demand aircraft

– Generally targeting used current generation Boeing and Airbus commercial aircraft

  • Older aircraft transactions expected to be protected

by the underlying “metal” value of the aircraft

  • Deploying an opportunistic, transaction driven

strategy while leveraging strong relationships and specialized knowledge creates attractive investment

  • pportunities
  • Continually optimize portfolio through aircraft

acquisitions and dispositions

  • Maintain a highly diversified portfolio in terms of

aircraft type, lessee, geography

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Merx is Well-Diversified

Aircraft by Type (1) (2)

27

71 aircraft 12 aircraft types 43 lessees in 23 countries

Weighted average age of aircraft

~8.3 years

Weighted average lease maturity

~5.1 years

B737-800 41% A320-200 30% 777- 200LRF 6% A321-200 4% A319-100 4% A330-200 3% E-195 3% E-190 2% A330-300 2% B737- 900ER 2% B737-700 2% E-170 1% (1) As of June 30, 2017 Based on calendar year. (2) Based on base value. (3) Revenue for next four quarters. For more information about Merx, please visit www.merxaviation.com.

Merx Portfolio (1) Aircraft by Region (1) (2)

Asia 33% North America 20% LATAM 18% Europe 16% Africa 5% Australia 5% Middle East 3%

Aircraft Value by Lessee (1) (2)

2 4 8 11 7 6 9 9 4 8 3

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027

# of leases maturing by year

7% 6% 6% 6% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 32%

24 Lessees Each < 2% 43 Lessees

Staggered Lease Maturity (1) Revenue by Lessee (1) (3)

7.1% 6.2% 6.2%

43 Lessees

slide-29
SLIDE 29

28

Conclusion

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Reasons to Own AINV

  • Apollo affiliation provides significant benefits
  • Origination platform is highly differentiated versus other market participants
  • Receipt of exemptive relief to co-invest enhances competitive positioning
  • Strategy designed to deliver consistent shareholder returns and a stable NAV
  • Strong balance sheet and diverse funding sources

29

slide-31
SLIDE 31

30

Appendices

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Net Leverage Ratio (1)

31

(1) Net leverage ratio is defined as debt outstanding plus payable for investments purchased, less receivable for investments sold, less cash, less foreign currencies at fair value, divided by net assets.

0.66 x 0.63 x 0.66 x 0.55 x 0.62 x 0.00 x 0.10 x 0.20 x 0.30 x 0.40 x 0.50 x 0.60 x 0.70 x 0.80 x 0.90 x 1.00 x Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 Net Leverage Ratio Target Range Previous Upper Target

Upper Target ~ 0.70x Lower Target ~ 0.60x Previous Upper Target ~ 0.75x

slide-33
SLIDE 33

AINV / MidCap Product Overlap

Asset Based

  • Secured loans to manufacturing, distribution, retail and services companies
  • Core product consists of revolvers advancing against accounts receivable and inventory; will

selectively include term loans against fixed assets or as supported by cash flow

  • High-touch asset class requiring liquidity for daily revolver fundings, collateral evaluation and diligence

expertise, borrowing base monitoring capabilities and complex cash dominion structures

  • Leverages MidCap’s in-place portfolio and collateral monitoring infrastructure

Life Sciences

  • Low loan-to-value loans, covered by material asset values and cash on hand, made to borrowers in

product development (e.g., biotech companies) or early commercialization

  • Enterprise value loans
  • Niche market with what we believe to be disproportionate risk reward – almost no historical losses

across market

  • Typically have multiple sources of exit including strong equity support, well funded balance sheets,

and liquidation value

  • No underwriting of science – only of cash support and development timeline

Lender Finance

  • Senior secured facilities made to lenders in various industries (consumer and commercial) secured by

their underlying collateral

  • Typically benefit from multiple levels of credit support and protection in addition to support of

underlying borrowers

  • Defined eligibility criteria or loan-by-loan approval, borrowing base structure with ability to remove

specific assets, and corporate and/or personal recourse with various restrictive covenants

  • Highly structured transactions skewing towards larger commitments ($25+ million) to provide

diversification of underlying collateral

  • Significant opportunities exist to fill the capital void left by large banks exiting and descaling in this

asset class

32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Financial Highlights

33

(1) Numbers may not sum due to rounding. (2) The Company’s net leverage ratio is defined as debt outstanding plus payable for investments purchased, less receivable for investments sold, less cash, less foreign currencies, divided by net assets. (3) On a cost basis. Exclusive of investments on non-accrual status.

($ in thousands, except per share data) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Operating Results (1) Net investment income 33,320 $ 37,290 $ 36,352 $ 39,537 $ 36,064 $ Net realized and change in unrealized gains (losses) (4,539) (29,238) (25,062) 1,577 (78,149) Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations 28,781 $ 8,052 $ 11,290 $ 41,114 $ (42,086) $ Net investment income per share 0.15 $ 0.17 $ 0.17 $ 0.18 $ 0.16 $ Net realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) per share (0.02) (0.13) (0.12) 0.00 (0.35) Earnings (Loss) per share - basic 0.13 $ 0.04 $ 0.05 $ 0.18 $ (0.19) $ Distribution recorded per common share 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 0.20 $ Select Balance Sheet and Other Data Investment portfolio (at fair value) 2,416,579 $ 2,316,708 $ 2,526,333 $ 2,548,568 $ 2,617,714 $ Debt outstanding 920,674 $ 848,449 $ 1,033,958 $ 1,014,794 $ 1,098,977 $ Net assets 1,477,624 $ 1,481,797 $ 1,506,699 $ 1,541,938 $ 1,552,409 $ Net asset value per share 6.73 $ 6.74 $ 6.86 $ 6.95 $ 6.90 $ Debt-to-equity ratio 0.62 x 0.57 x 0.69 x 0.66 x 0.71 x Net leverage ratio (2) 0.62 x 0.55 x 0.66 x 0.63 x 0.66 x Weighted average shares outstanding 219,694,654 219,694,654 220,168,710 223,835,344 225,940,769 Shares outstanding 219,694,654 219,694,654 219,694,654 221,994,770 225,067,696 Number of portfolio companies, at period end 84 86 85 82 81 Weighted Average Yields, at period end (3) Secured debt 10.2% 10.2% 10.9% 11.0% 11.0% Unsecured debt 11.1% 11.1% 10.7% 10.8% 10.8% Total debt portfolio 10.3% 10.3% 10.9% 11.0% 11.0%

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Summary Investment Activity

34

(1) Numbers may not sum due to rounding. (2) Yield on activity is for debt investments and excludes select short-term trades and investments on non-accrual status.

($ in thousands) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Portfolio Activity (1) Investments made 342,036 $ 149,408 $ 201,309 $ 127,629 $ 122,718 $ Investments sold (9,949) (38,393) (17,114) (17,924) (146,040) Net investment activity before repayments 332,087 $ 111,015 $ 184,195 $ 109,705 $ (23,322) $ Investments repaid (241,998) (306,449) (178,208) (197,130) (193,376) Net investment activity 90,089 $ (195,434) $ 5,987 $ (87,425) $ (216,698) $ Number of portfolio companies, at beginning of period 86 85 82 81 89 Number of new portfolio companies 11 13 13 6 5 Number of exited portfolio companies (13) (12) (10) (5) (13) Number of portfolio companies, at period end 84 86 85 82 81 Number of investments in existing portfolio companies 11 10 8 10 12 Yield on Activity (2) Yield on investments made 10.3% 9.8% 10.1% 10.3% 10.8% Yield on sales and repayments 11.3% 9.9% 10.5% 10.7% 10.5%

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Quarterly Investment Activity

Portfolio Yield (1) (2) Net Investment Activity ($ in millions) Yield on Investment Activity (2) (3)

35

(1) Weighted average yield on total debt portfolio on a cost basis at period end, exclusive of investments on non-accrual status. (2) Change in terms on investments may impact the weighted average yield of the total debt portfolio but are not reflected in new, sold or repaid investments. (3) Yield on activity is for debt investments and excludes select short-term trades and investments on non-accrual status.

Investment Activity ($ in millions)

($217) ($87) $6 ($195) $90 Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 10.8% 10.3% 10.1% 9.8% 10.3% 11.9% 13.1% 8.8% 10.2% 9.4% 9.9% 10.4% 10.7% 9.9% 11.4% Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 New Investments Sales Repayments $123 $128 $201 $149 $342 ($146) ($18) ($17) ($38) ($10) ($193) ($197) ($178) ($306) ($242) Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 New Investments Sales Repayments 11.0% 11.0% 10.9% 10.3% 10.3% Jun-16 Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Detailed Quarterly Investment Activity

36

(1) Numbers may not sum due to rounding. (2) First lien purchases include revolver drawdowns; first lien sales and repayments includes revolver repayments. (3) Yield on activity is for debt investments and excludes select short-term trades and investments on non-accrual status.

($ in thousands) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Purchases (1) First lien (2) 236,735 $ 52,018 $ 34,174 $ 55,021 $ 58,225 $ Second lien 103,819 92,742 153,657 51,154 46,476 Total secured debt 340,554 144,760 187,831 106,175 104,700 Unsecured debt

  • 2,499

12,713 5,154

  • Structured products and other
  • 106

206 16,301 11,270 Preferred equity

  • Common equity/interests and warrants

1,481 2,043 560

  • 6,748

Total Purchases 342,036 $ 149,408 $ 201,309 $ 127,629 $ 122,718 $ Yield at Cost on Debt Purchases (3) First lien 10.3% 9.2% 10.0% 10.5% 11.2% Second lien 10.3% 10.2% 10.3% 10.0% 10.3% Total secured debt 10.3% 9.8% 10.2% 10.3% 10.8% Unsecured debt N/A 8.0% 8.5% 10.2% N/A Preferred equity N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Yield at Cost on Debt Purchases 10.3% 9.8% 10.1% 10.3% 10.8% Sales and Repayments (1) First lien (2) 136,063 $ 52,662 $ 22,904 $ 26,172 $ 89,874 $ Second lien 53,838 96,892 35,888 128,578 140,586 Total secured debt 189,901 149,554 58,792 154,750 230,459 Unsecured debt

  • 92,836
  • 4,461

13,473 Structured products and other 33,166 55,102 96,647 48,239 31,561 Preferred equity

  • 36,868

306 1,016 Common equity/interests and warrants 28,879 47,350 3,016 7,298 62,907 Total Sales and Repayments 251,947 $ 344,842 $ 195,322 $ 215,054 $ 339,416 $ Yield at Cost on Debt Sales and Repayments (3) First lien 12.0% 9.3% 10.5% 10.3% 12.1% Second lien 9.7% 10.1% 9.6% 10.8% 9.8% Total secured debt 11.3% 9.8% 9.9% 10.7% 10.6% Unsecured debt N/A 10.0% N/A 12.0% 9.4% Preferred equity N/A N/A 11.5% 4.0% 4.0% Yield at Cost on Debt Sales and Repayments 11.3% 9.9% 10.5% 10.7% 10.5% Yield at Cost on Sales 9.4% 10.2% 8.8% 13.1% 11.9% Yield at Cost on Debt Repayments 11.4% 9.9% 10.7% 10.4% 9.9%

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Net Asset Value

Net Asset Value Per Share

Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

37

$6.73 $6.74 $6.86 $6.95 $6.90 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16

฀ ($ in thousands, except per share data) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Per Share NAV, beginning of period 6.74 $ 6.86 $ 6.95 $ 6.90 $ 7.28 $ Net investment income 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.16 Net realized and change in unrealized gain (loss) (0.02) (0.13) (0.12) 0.00 (0.35) Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations 0.13 0.04 0.05 0.18 (0.19) Repurchase of common stock

  • 0.02

0.02 0.01 Distribution recorded (0.15) (0.15) (0.15) (0.15) (0.20) NAV, end of period 6.73 6.74 6.86 6.95 6.90 Total NAV, beginning of period 1,481,797 $ 1,506,699 $ 1,541,938 $ 1,552,409 $ 1,645,581 $ Net investment income 33,320 37,290 36,352 39,537 36,064 Net realized and change in unrealized gains (losses) (4,538) (29,238) (25,062) 1,577 (78,150) Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations 28,781 8,052 11,290 41,114 (42,086) Repurchase of common stock

  • (13,575)

(18,270) (6,073) Distributions recorded (32,954) (32,954) (32,954) (33,315) (45,013) NAV, end of period 1,477,624 $ 1,481,797 $ 1,506,699 $ 1,541,938 $ 1,552,409 $

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Portfolio as of June 30, 2017

Fixed Rate vs. Floating Rate (1) (2) By Industry (1) (3) Sponsored vs. Non-sponsored (1) (4)

38

(1) On a fair value basis. (2) The Company has modified the reporting of its interest rate type information. The interest type information is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping, commodities and investments on non-accrual status. (3) Other consists of: Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber; Insurance; Aerospace & Defense; Utilities – Electric; Consumer Goods – Durable; Automotive; Advertising, Printing & Publishing; Food & Grocery; Hotel, Gaming, Leisure, Restaurants; Containers, Packaging & Glass; Retail; Media – Diversified & Production; and Metals & Mining. (4) The Company has modified the reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages. The reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities.

By Asset Class (1)

Secured debt 78% Unsecured debt 7% Structured products and

  • ther

6% Preferrred equity, common equity/interests and w arrants 9%

Fixed Rate Assets 14% Floating Rate Assets 86% Sponsored 83% Non- sponsored 17%

Business Serv ices 21.7% Av iation and Consumer Transport 19.2% Energy – Electricity 8.6% Transportation – Cargo, Distribution 6.8% Energy – Oil & Gas 6.6% High Tech Industries 6.2% Div ersif ied Inv estment Vehicles, Banking, Finance, Real Estate 4.6% Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals 4.5% Manuf acturing, Capital Equipment 3.1% Telecommunications 2.8% Other 15.9%

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Portfolio Composition

39 ($ in thousands) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Portfolio Composition, measured at fair value ($) First lien 1,140,215 $ 1,049,232 $ 1,052,890 $ 1,060,606 $ 1,055,120 $ Second lien 734,946 685,268 683,858 559,782 647,203 Total secured debt 1,875,161 $ 1,734,500 $ 1,736,748 $ 1,620,388 $ 1,702,323 $ Unsecured debt 162,028 161,385 249,121 234,645 233,136 Structured products and other 135,863 166,893 217,748 307,052 315,443 Preferred equity 25,754 25,637 30,785 67,602 67,538 Common equity/interests and warrants 217,772 228,293 291,930 318,881 299,274 Total investment portfolio 2,416,579 $ 2,316,708 $ 2,526,333 $ 2,548,568 $ 2,617,714 $ Portfolio Composition, measured at fair value (%) First lien 47% 45% 42% 42% 40% Second lien 30% 30% 27% 22% 25% Total secured debt 78% 75% 69% 64% 65% Unsecured debt 7% 7% 10% 9% 9% Structured products and other 6% 7% 9% 12% 12% Preferred equity 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% Common equity/interests and warrants 9% 10% 11% 12% 11% Portfolio Composition by Strategy, measured at fair value (%) Core strategies (1) 74% 71% 66% 61% 59% Non-core strategites (2) 23% 24% 29% 34% 35% Legacy & Other 4% 5% 5% 5% 6% Interest Rate Type, measured at fair value (3) Fixed rate % 14% 16% 16% 21% 23% Floating rate % 86% 84% 84% 79% 77% Sponsored / Non-sponsored, measured at fair value (4) Sponsored % 83% 86% 86% 84% 86% Non-sponsored % 17% 14% 14% 16% 14%

(1) Core strategies include corporate lending, aviation, life sciences, asset based and lender finance. (2) Non-core strategies include oil & gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities. (3) The Company has modified the calculation of its interest rate type information. The interest type information is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping, commodities and investments on non-accrual status. Prior periods have been modified to reflect this definition. (4) The Company has modified the reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages. The reporting of its sponsored / non-sponsored percentages is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping and commodities. Prior periods have been modified to reflect this definition.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Credit Quality

As of June 30, 2017, 1.9% of total investments at amortized cost, or 1.1% of total investments at fair value, were on non-accrual status.

40

(1) Source: Company data. Includes all portfolio company investments except structured products, common equities, warrants and investments on non-accrual status. Also excludes select investments where debt-to-EBITDA is not a relevant or appropriate metric, or data is not available. Weighted average by cost. ($ in thousands) 1Q'18 4Q'17 3Q'17 2Q'17 1Q'17 Jun-17 Mar-17 Dec-16 Sep-16 Jun-16 Investments on Non-Accrual Status Non-accrual investments at amortized cost 46,430 $ 183,141 $ 236,453 $ 312,955 $ 339,970 $ Non-accrual investments / total portfolio, at amortized cost 1.9% 7.0% 8.2% 11.1% 11.8% Non-accrual investments at fair value 27,458 $ 68,571 $ 65,587 $ 99,521 $ 118,292 $ Non-accrual investments / total portfolio, at fair value 1.1% 3.0% 2.6% 3.9% 4.5% Portfolio Company Credit Metrics (1) Net Leverage (Close) 5.4 x 5.5 x 5.6 x 5.6 x 5.6 x Net Leverage (Current) 5.5 x 5.5 x 5.7 x 5.5 x 5.4 x Interest Coverage (Close) 2.7 x 2.5 x 2.4 x 2.5 x 2.5 x Interest Coverage (Current) 2.7 x 2.5 x 2.5 x 2.6 x 2.8 x ($ in thousands) Industry Cost Fair Value Investments on Non-Accrual Status as of June 30, 2017 Magnetation, LLC Metals & Mining 2,050 $ 717 $ Spotted Hawk Energy – Oil & Gas 44,380 26,741 Total 46,430 $ 27,458 $

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Diversified Funding Sources as of June 30, 2017

41

(1) Includes the stated interest expense and commitment fees on the unused portion of the Senior Secured Facility. Excludes amortized debt issuance costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2017. Based on average debt

  • bligations outstanding.

Debt Facilities Debt Issued / Amended Final Maturity Date Interest Rate Principal Amount Outstanding

(in thousands)

Senior Secured Facility ($1.14 billion) 12/22/2016 12/22/2021 L + 200 bps 272,797 $ Senior Secured Notes (Series B) 9/29/2011 9/29/2018 6.25% 16,000 2042 Notes (redeemable on or after 10/15/17) 10/9/2012 10/15/2042 6.625% 150,000 2043 Notes (redeemable on or after 7/15/18) 6/17/2013 7/15/2043 6.875% 150,000 2025 Notes 3/3/2015 3/3/2025 5.25% 350,000 $ Weighted Average Annualized Interest Cost (1) & Total Debt Obligations 5.318% 938,797 $ Deferred Financing Cost and Debt Discount (18,123) Total Debt Obligations,Net of Deferred Financing Cost and Debt Discount 920,674 $

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Apollo Investment Corporation has taken several steps to prepare for higher interest rates including: increasing the floating rate portion of the portfolio and issuing fixed rate debt.

Interest Rate Exposure as of June 30, 2017

Funding Sources (3) Floating Rate Debt Floor Net Investment Income Interest Rate Sensitivity (4)

42

(1) On a fair value basis. (2) The Company has modified the calculation of its interest rate type information. The interest type information is calculated using the Company’s corporate debt portfolio and excludes aviation, oil and gas, structured credit, renewables, shipping, commodities and investments on non-accrual status. (3) Based on total debt obligations before deferred financing cost and debt discount. (4) The table shows the estimated annual impact on net investment income of base rate changes in interest rates (considering interest rate floors for floating rate instruments) to our loan portfolio and outstanding debt as of June 30, 2017, assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure.

Investment Portfolio (1) (2)

Fixed Rate Debt 28% Floating Rate Debt 11% Common Equity 61% Fixed Rate Assets 14% Floating Rate Assets 86% ($ in millions) Par or Cost % of Floating Rate Portfolio Interest Rate Floors No Floor 210 $ 17% < 1.00% 26 2% 1.00% to 1.24% 935 74% 1.25% to 1.49% 87 7% 1.50% to 1.74% 9 1% > =1.75% 0% Total 1,267 $ 100% Annual Net Investment Income (in millions) Annual Net Investment Income Per Share Basis Point Change Up 400 basis points 30.9 $ 0.141 $ Up 300 basis points 23.2 $ 0.106 $ Up 200 basis points 15.4 $ 0.070 $ Up 100 basis points 7.7 $ 0.035 $ Down 100 basis points (1.0) $ (0.005) $

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Contact Information

For more information, please contact: Elizabeth Besen Investor Relations Manager Phone: (212) 822-0625 Email: ebesen@apollolp.com Gregory W. Hunt Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Phone: (212) 822-0655 Email: ghunt@apollolp.com

43

slide-45
SLIDE 45

44