Algorithmic Bias in Google Searches for Political Parties and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

algorithmic bias in google searches for political parties
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Algorithmic Bias in Google Searches for Political Parties and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Algorithmic Bias in Google Searches for Political Parties and Candidates Johannes Nakayama, Nils Plettenberg, Laura Burbach, Andr Calero Valdez Human-Computer Interaction Center, RWTH Aachen University The Datenspende BTW17 Dataset search


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Algorithmic Bias in Google Searches for Political Parties and Candidates

Johannes Nakayama, Nils Plettenberg, Laura Burbach, André Calero Valdez Human-Computer Interaction Center, RWTH Aachen University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Datenspende BTW17

The Dataset

slide-3
SLIDE 3

database search terms

Ø 1647 searches per day

search terms search terms 4000 participants

slide-4
SLIDE 4

parties:

‘CDU’ ‘CSU’ ‘SPD’ ‘FDP’ ‘Bündnis 90/Die Grünen’ ‘Die Linke‘ ‘AfD’

candidates:

‘Angela Merkel’ ‘Martin Schulz’ ‘Christian Lindner’ ‘Katrin Göring-Eckardt’ ‘Cem Özdemir’ ‘Sahra Wagenknecht’ ‘Dietmar Bartsch’ ‘Alice Weidel’ ‘Alexander Gauland’

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Can we find evidence for personalization in the dataset?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

First approach

set intersection: first three/six/nine results

slide-7
SLIDE 7

C D A G F B H E I A B C D E F G H I

slide-8
SLIDE 8

C D A G F B H E I A B C D E F G H I

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • verlap of 66.67 %

repeat for every list with every other list compute mean

C D A A B C

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

downside: only rough order effects

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rank-biased overlap (RBO)

Result 1 Result 2 Result 3 Result 4 Result 5 Result 6 Result 7 Result 8

Result 1

Result 2

Result 3

Result 4

Result 5

Result 6

Result 7

Result 8 (Webber et al. 2010)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How does RBO work?

User 1 User 2 A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H I I J J

RBO score: 1.0

User 1 User 2 A K B L C M D N E O F P G Q H R I S J T

RBO score: 0

User 1 User 2 A J B I C H D G E F F E G D H C I B J A

Identical Lists Entirely different items Same items, reverse

  • rder

RBO score: 0.5116076

slide-15
SLIDE 15

User 1 User 2 A K B B C C D D E E F F G G H H I I J J

How does RBO work?

RBO score: 0.7297158

User 1 User 2 A A B B C K D D E E F F G G H H I I J J

RBO score: 0.901564

User 1 User 2 A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H I I J J K P L Q M R N S O T

1st item different 3rd item different Last 5 items different RBO score: 0.8747158

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Similarity of Search Results

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

T-test

significant differences between RBO scores of parties and candidates t = 27.4, p < .001

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

H

  • w

c a n w e e x p l a i n t h e d

  • w

n w a r d t r e n d ?

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Search Volume

Trends

no absolute values

  • nly relative scores
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary

significant difference between parties and candidates dependence between RBO scores and search volume

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Future Work

RBO package (already in progress)

R

content analysis

T

location

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • pen data and all analyses available at:
  • sf.io/e598k