A Spatial representation of f an Added Valu lue In Index: Europe and Ext xtreme Events
James Ciarlo`, Erika Coppola, Adriano Fantini, Cosimo Solidoro, & Filippo Giorgi
1
Added Valu lue In Index: Europe and Ext xtreme Events James - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Spatial representation of f an Added Valu lue In Index: Europe and Ext xtreme Events James Ciarlo` , Erika Coppola, Adriano Fantini, Cosimo Solidoro, & Filippo Giorgi 1 Added Value Nested RCM simulations are indeed useful as
James Ciarlo`, Erika Coppola, Adriano Fantini, Cosimo Solidoro, & Filippo Giorgi
1
βNested RCM simulations are indeed useful as climate downscaling tools to the extent that they add valuable information to that produced by GCMsβ Torma et al. (2015)
Topography (m) Torma et al. (2015)
2
maximum distance between two cumulative distribution functions
3
Torma et al. (2015)
4
Relative Probability Difference πΈπππΈ = Ο ππβπ€ β Ο ππβπ€ Ο ππβπ€
5
1. Interpolate to common grid [RCM] 2. Calculate difference in PDFs 3. β¦ for EACH and EVERY individual grid-point!
6
7
OR: Relative Probability Difference [0 - 100%]
π΅π = πΈπ»π·π β πΈππ·π
8
1. Interpolate to common grid [RCM] 2. Calculate difference in PDFs 3. Compare the differences Units depend on [Relative] Probability Difference
Data-set Region Resolution Reference EURO4M Alps 5 km Isotta et al. (2014) Spain02 Spain 0.11Β° Herrera et al. (2015) SAFRAN France 8 km Vidal et al. (2010) ENG REGR UK 0.11Β° Perry et al. (2009) KLIMAGRID Norway 1 km Mohr (2009) PTHBV Sweden 4 km Johansson (2002) CARPATCLIM Carpathians 0.10Β° Szalai et al. (2013) REGNIE Germany 1 km Rauthe et al. (2013) GRIPHO Italy 12 km Fantini et al. (in progress) more data-sets may be includedβ¦
9
10
Probabil ilit ity Dif ifference: EURO-CORDEX 12km
Added Valu lue: EURO-CORDEX 12km
11
12
q95
13
full PDF q95-100 fraction
q95-100 fraction q0-5 fraction
14
q99.9-100 fraction q0-50 fraction q0-25 fraction
π΅π = πΈπ»π·π β πΈππ·π
15
Historical Data: πΈπππΈ = Ο ππβπ€ β Ο ππβπ€ Ο ππβπ€ Future Data: πΈπππΈ = Ο π
πβπ€ β Ο πββπ€
Ο πββπ€ for EACH and EVERY individual grid-point!
Difference between RCM and GCM anomalies, compared with the corresponding region-average change in each model.
πΈπ βπ = βπππ·ππ β β ΰ΄€ πππ·ππ β (βππ»π·ππ β β ΰ΄€ ππ»π·ππ)
Giorgi et al. (2016)
16
SE Europe Alps Carpathians
17
Raffaele, Taleena Sines, Jose Abraham Torres Alavez, (Xuejie Gao?)
Email: jciarlo@ictp.it
18
experiments against high resolution observations. Climate Dynamics, 51: 877-900.
Geoscience, 9: 584-589.
the interpolation methodology. International Journal of Climatology, doi:19.1002/joc.4391
from pan-Alpine raingauge data. International Journal of Climatology, 34: 1657-1675.
University, Report nr. A76.
Geophysical Research, 116 (D11106): 1-10.
and validation with observations. Journal of Climate, 20: 5553β5571.
Memorandum No. 24.
gridded daily data set (HYRAS). Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22: 235-256.
the Alps. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 120: 3957-3972.
Climatology, 30: 1627-1644.
19