adaptive consumer resource models
play

Adaptive consumer-resource models LIPh lab winter workshop 2018 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Adaptive consumer-resource models LIPh lab winter workshop 2018 Leonardo Pacciani-Mori December 16th, 2018 The context of our work 1 of 8 The context of our work Competitive Exclusion Principle (CEP): the number of competing coexisting


  1. Adaptive consumer-resource models LIPh lab winter workshop 2018 Leonardo Pacciani-Mori December 16th, 2018

  2. The context of our work 1 of 8

  3. The context of our work “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. 1 of 8

  4. The context of our work “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated: 1 of 8

  5. The context of our work “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated: 1 Bacterial community culture experiments From Goldford et al. 2018 1 of 8

  6. The context of our work “Competitive Exclusion Principle” (CEP): the number of competing coexisting species is limited by the number of available resources. There are many known cases in nature where this principle is clearly violated: 1 Bacterial community culture experiments From Goldford et al. 2018 2 Direct bacterial competition experiments From Friedman et al. 2017 1 of 8

  7. Modeling ecological competition 2 of 8

  8. Modeling ecological competition Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model . 2 of 8

  9. Modeling ecological competition Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model . species S 1 α σ i species S 2 resource R 1 . . . . . . . . . species S p resource R p . . . species S m > p 2 of 8

  10. Modeling ecological competition Since the ’70s, the main mathematical tool used to model competitive ecosystems has been MacArthur’s consumer-resource model . species S 1 α σ i species S 2 resource R 1 . . . . . . . . . species S n ≤ p resource R p . . . species S m > p As it is, the model reproduces the CEP. In order to violate it, very special assumptions or parameter fine-tunings are necessary (Posfai et al. 2017). 2 of 8

  11. Our work 3 of 8

  12. Our work In the literature of consumer-resource models α σ i are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time. 3 of 8

  13. Our work In the literature of consumer-resource models α σ i are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time. Problem � In many experiments diauxic shifts have been observed (Monod 1949)! Cell concentration ( g / l ) 1.00 0.50 0.10 0.05 0.01 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Time ( hours ) Growth of Klebsiella oxytoca on glucose and lactose. Data taken from Kompala et al. 1986, figure 11. 3 of 8

  14. Our work In the literature of consumer-resource models α σ i are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time. Our work in one sentence We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time. 3 of 8

  15. Our work In the literature of consumer-resource models α σ i are always considered as fixed parameters that do not change over time. Our work in one sentence We have modified MacArthur’s consumer-resource model so that the metabolic strategies evolve over time. How? Adaptive framework: each species changes its metabolic strategies in order to increase its own growth rate; adaptation velocity is measured by a parameter d . 3 of 8

  16. What we have found 4 of 8

  17. What we have found Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally observed phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community! 4 of 8

  18. What we have found Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally observed phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community! 1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts: 4 of 8

  19. What we have found Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally observed phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community! 1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts: 4 of 8

  20. What we have found Using adaptive metabolic strategies allows us to explain many experimentally observed phenomena, that span from the single species to the whole community! 1/5) With one species and two resources, the model reproduces diauxic shifts: Notice We can explain the existence of diauxic shifts with a completely general model, neglecting the particular molecular mechanisms of the species’ metabolism. 4 of 8

  21. What we have found 2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle: 5 of 8

  22. What we have found 2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle: 10 1 10 0 10 - 1 10 - 2 10 - 3 10 - 4 10 - 5 10 - 6 0 50 100 150 200 Fixed metabolic strategies 5 of 8

  23. What we have found 2/5) When multiple species and resources are considered, the model naturally violates the Competitive Exclusion Principle: 10 1 10 0 10 - 1 10 - 2 10 - 3 10 - 4 10 - 5 10 - 6 0 50 100 150 200 Adaptive metabolic strategies 5 of 8

  24. What we have found 3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive α σ i leads to more stable communities: 6 of 8

  25. What we have found 3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive α σ i leads to more stable communities: 10 0 10 - 3 10 - 6 10 - 9 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fixed metabolic strategies, τ in = τ out = 20 6 of 8

  26. What we have found 3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive α σ i leads to more stable communities: 10 1 10 0 10 - 1 10 - 2 10 - 3 10 - 4 10 - 5 10 - 6 0 100 200 300 400 500 Adaptive metabolic strategies, τ in = τ out = 20 6 of 8

  27. What we have found 3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive α σ i leads to more stable communities: 10 1 10 - 1 10 - 3 10 - 5 10 - 7 10 - 9 0 100 200 300 400 500 Fixed metabolic strategies, τ in = 20, τ out = 5 6 of 8

  28. What we have found 3/5) When environmental conditions are variable (i.e. the nutrient supply rates change in time) using adaptive α σ i leads to more stable communities: 10 1 10 0 10 - 1 10 - 2 10 - 3 10 - 4 10 - 5 10 - 6 0 100 200 300 400 500 Adaptive metabolic strategies, τ in = 20, τ out = 5 6 of 8

  29. What we have found Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 7 of 8

  30. What we have found Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 4/5) If adaptation is sufficiently slow there can be extinction and the Competitive Exclusion Principle can be recovered: 20 species, 3 resources 7 of 8

  31. What we have found Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations: 20 species, 4 resources 7 of 8

  32. What we have found Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations: 10 1 10 0 10 - 1 10 - 2 10 - 3 10 - 4 10 - 5 10 - 6 0 100 200 300 400 500 7 of 8

  33. What we have found Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 5/5) If nutrient supply rates change in time, faster adaptation leads to less variable populations: 20 species, 4 resources 7 of 8

  34. References Friedman, Jonathan et al. (2017). “Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms”. In: Nature Ecology and Evolution 1.5, pp. 1–7. Goldford, Joshua E. et al. (2018). “Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly”. In: Science 361.6401, pp. 469–474. Kompala, Dhinakar S. et al. (1986). “Investigation of bacterial growth on mixed substrates: Experimental evaluation of cybernetic models”. In: Biotechnology and Bioengineering 28.7, pp. 1044–1055. Monod, Jacques (1949). “The Growth of Bacterial Cultures”. In: Annual Review of Microbiology 3.1, pp. 371–394. Posfai, Anna et al. (2017). “Metabolic Trade-Offs Promote Diversity in a Model Ecosystem”. In: Physical Review Letters 118.2, p. 28103. 8 of 8

  35. An idea �

  36. An idea � 1 of 4

  37. An idea � Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. 1 of 4

  38. An idea � Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. Question How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it? 1 of 4

  39. An idea � Adaptation velocity d is a crucial element of the model. Question How could d be measured? What biological interpretation can we give it? Possible answer? I suspect that an interesting biological quantity in this sense could be the lag phase of a microbial community, that precedes exponential growth. 1 of 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend