ACPMS On Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra in mould theory
Nao Komiyama
Nagoya University
27/11/2020
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 1 / 35
ACPMS On Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra in mould theory Nao - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ACPMS On Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra in mould theory Nao Komiyama Nagoya University 27/11/2020 Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 1 / 35 Contents Introduction 1 Kashiwara-Vergne group Kashiwara-Vergne Lie algebra Mould 2
Nao Komiyama
Nagoya University
27/11/2020
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 1 / 35
1
Introduction Kashiwara-Vergne group Kashiwara-Vergne Lie algebra
2
Mould Definition of mould Lie algebra ARI(Γ) of moulds
3
Lie algebra Lie subalgebras of ARI(Γ) Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra lkrv(Γ)••
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 2 / 35
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 3 / 35
Kashiwara and Vergne proposed a conjecture related to the Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff series in the following paper: The Campbell-Hausdorff formula and invariant hyperfunctions,
There is one of the formulations of the above KV conjecture by Alekseev, Enriquez and Torossian.
Notation
ring defined as the universal enveloping algebra of F2.
by exp(x) := ∑
n≥0
xn n! (x ∈ F2).
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 4 / 35
Generalized Kashiwara-Vergne problem ([Alekseev-Enriquez-Torossian])
Find a group automorphism P : exp F2 → exp F2 such that P ∈ TAut exp F2 and P satisfies P(eX0eX1) = eX0+X1 and the coboundary Jacobian condition δ ◦ J(P) = 0. Here, P ∈ TAut exp F2 means that P is in Aut exp F2 such that P(eX0) = p1eX0p−1
1
and P(eX1) = p2eX1p−1
2
for some p1, p2 ∈ exp F2. J stands for the Jacobian cocycle and δ means the differential map.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 5 / 35
Definition ([A-E-T; 2010], [A-T; 2012])
The Kashiwara-Vergne group KRV is defined to be the set of P ∈ TAut exp F2 which satisfies P(eX0eX1) = eX0+X1 and the coboundary Jacobian condition δ ◦ J(P) = 0.
Remark
The set KRV forms a subgroup of Aut exp F2.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 6 / 35
We denote KRV0 to be a subgroup of KRV consisting of P without linear terms in p1 and p2. There are the following inclusions.
Theorem ([A-E-T; 2010], [A-T; 2012])
GRT1 ⊂ KRV0.
Theorem ([Schneps; 2012])
DMR0 ⊂ KRV0. Here, GRT1 is the Grothendieck-Teichm¨ uller group introduced by Drinfel’d, and DMR0 is the double shuffle group introduced by Racinet. cf.) H. Furusho, Around associators. Automorphic forms and Galois representations, (2014) Vol. 2, 105–117.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 7 / 35
To recall the definition of KV Lie algebra, we prepare some notations.
variables x and y with deg x = deg y = 1 (Lw is the Q-linear space generated by Lie monomials whose total degree is w).
A = Q⟨x, y⟩ is regarded as the universal enveloping algebra of L.
and put the trace map tr : A ↠ Cyc(A) to be the natural projection.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 8 / 35
Definition ([A-E-T; 2010], [A-T; 2012])
The Kashiwara-Vergne (graded) Lie algebra is the graded Q-linear space krv• = ⊕w≥2krvw. Here, its degree w-part krvw is defined to be the set of Lie elements F ∈ Lw such that there exists G = G(F) in Lw with [x, G] + [y, F] = 0 (KV1) and α ∈ Q with tr(Gxx + Fyy) = α · tr ((x + y)w − xw − yw) (KV2) when we write F = Fxx + Fyy and G = Gxx + Gyy in A. We note that such G = G(F) uniquely exists for F ∈ Lw when w ≥ 2.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 9 / 35
The Lie algebra structure of krv•
The derivation DF,G of L defined by x → [x, G] and y → [y, F] for some F, G ∈ L. It forms a Lie algebra by the bracket [DF1,G1, DF2,G2] = DF1,G1 ◦ DF2,G2 − DF2,G2 ◦ DF1,G1.
derivations D such that D(x + y) = 0. It forms a Lie subalgebra of tder. The Lie algebra structure of krv• is defined to be compatible with that of sder under the embedding F ∈ krv• to DF,G(F) ∈ sder.
Today’s goal
To give a Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra lkrv(Γ)••.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 10 / 35
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 11 / 35
Early 1980s, the mould was introduced by Ecalle in his paper: Les fonctions r´ esurgentes, Tome I, II, III. In 2000s, he applied the moulds to study of multiple zeta values in papers:
etique des multizetas,
and the enumeration of multizeta irreducibles. cf.) Schneps, ARI, GARI, Zig and Zag: An introduction to Ecalle’s theory
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 12 / 35
Let Γ be a finite abelian group. We set F := ∪
m⩾1
Q(x1, . . . , xm).
Definition ([Furusho-K, Definition 1.1])
A mould on Z⩾0 with values in F is a collection (a sequence) M = (Mm(x1, . . . , xm))m∈Z⩾0 = ( M0(∅), M1(x1), M2(x1, x2), . . . ) , with M0(∅) ∈ Q and Mm(x1, . . . , xm) ∈ Q(x1, . . . , xm)⊕Γ⊕m for m ⩾ 1, which is described by a summation Mm(x1, . . . , xm) = ⊕
(σ1,...,σm)∈Γ⊕mMm σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm)
where each Mm
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) ∈ Q(x1, . . . , xm).
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 13 / 35
The set M(F; Γ) forms a Q-linear space by A + B := (Am(x1, . . . , xm) + Bm(x1, . . . , xm))m∈Z⩾0, cA := (cAm(x1, . . . , xm))m∈Z⩾0, for A, B ∈ M(F; Γ) and c ∈ Q.
(A × B)m
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) := m
∑
i=0
Ai
σ1,...,σi(x1, . . . , xi)Bm−i σi+1,...,σm(xi+1, . . . , xm),
for A, B ∈ M(F; Γ) and for m ⩾ 0 and for (σ1, . . . , σm) ∈ Γ⊕m.
Q-algebra. Here, the unit I ∈ M(F; Γ) is given by I := (1, 0, 0, . . . ).
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 14 / 35
We give some examples.
Example
(1). Define A ∈ M(F; Γ) by
Am
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) :=
{ 0 (m = 0, 1),
1 (x2−x1) · · · 1 (xr −xr−1)
(m ≥ 2),
for m ≥ 0 and for σ1, . . . , σm ∈ Γ. (2). Define B ∈ M(F; Γ) by
Bm
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) :=
{ 0 (m = 0, 1),
1 x1 + · · · + 1 xm − 1 x1+···+xm
(m ≥ 2),
for m ≥ 0 and for σ1, . . . , σm ∈ Γ.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 15 / 35
(this set forms a non-unital subalgebra of (M(F; Γ), ×)). For M ∈ ARI(Γ), we sometimes denote Mm
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) by
Mm (x1, ..., xm
σ1, ..., σm
) .
algebraic formulation: Put X := {(xi
σ
)}
i∈N,σ∈Γ. Let XZ be the set such that
XZ := {(u
σ) | u = a1x1 + · · · + akxk, k ∈ N, aj ∈ Z, σ ∈ Γ} .
Let X •
Z be the non-commutative free monoid generated by all elements of
XZ with the empty word ∅ as the unit. Occasionally we denote each element ω = u1 · · · um ∈ X •
Z with u1, . . . , um ∈ XZ by ω = (u1, . . . , um) as
a sequence. The length of ω = u1 · · · um is defined to be l(ω) := m.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 16 / 35
Definition ([F-K, Definition 1.8])
The flexions are the four binary operators
∗⌈∗, ∗⌉∗, ∗⌊∗, ∗⌋∗ : X •
Z × X • Z → X • Z which are defined by
β⌈α :=
(
b1 + · · · + bn + a1, a2, . . . , am σ1, σ2, . . . , σm
) , α⌉β := (
a1, . . . , am−1, am + b1 + · · · + bn σ1, . . . , σm−1, σm
) ,
β⌊α :=
(
a1, . . . , am τ −1
n
σ1, . . . , τ −1
n
σm
) , α⌋β := (
a1, . . . , am σ1τ −1
1
, . . . , σmτ −1
1
) ,
∅⌈γ := γ⌉∅ := ∅⌊γ := γ⌋∅ := γ, γ⌈∅ := ∅⌉γ := γ⌊∅ := ∅⌋γ := ∅,
for α = (a1,...,am
σ1,...,σm
) , β = (
b1,...,bn τ1,...,τn
) ∈ X •
Z (m, n ⩾ 1) and γ ∈ X • Z.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 17 / 35
Put x0 := ∅ and xm := (x1, ..., xm
σ1, ..., σm
) for m ⩾ 1.
Definition ([F-K, Definition 1.9]
Let B ∈ ARI(Γ). The linear map aritu(B) : ARI(Γ) → ARI(Γ) is defined by (aritu(B)(A))0(x0) := (aritu(B)(A))1(x1) := 0 and for m ≥ 2 (aritu(B)(A))m(xm) := ∑
xm=αβγ β,γ̸=∅
Al(α,γ)(αβ⌈γ)Bl(β)(β⌋γ) − ∑
xm=αβγ α,β̸=∅
Al(α,γ)(α⌉βγ)Bl(β)(α⌊β), for A ∈ ARI(Γ).
Remark
Assume that u1, . . . , um ∈ F are algebraically independent over Q. For M ∈ ARI(Γ), we denote Mm (u1, ..., um
σ1, ..., σm
) to be the image of Mm (x1, ..., xm
σ1, ..., σm
) under the field embedding Q(x1, . . . , xm) ֒ → F sending xi → ui.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 18 / 35
Example
For m = 2, we have
(aritu(B)(A))2(x2) = A1 (x1 + x2 σ2 ) B1 ( x1 σ1σ−1
2
) − A1 (x1 + x2 σ1 ) B1 ( x2 σ2σ−1
1
) ,
and for m = 3, we have
(aritu(B)(A))3(x3) = A2 (x1, x2 + x3 σ1, σ3 ) B1 ( x2 σ2σ−1
3
) + A1 (x1 + x2 + x3 σ3 ) B2 ( x1, x2 σ1σ−1
3 , σ2σ−1 3
) + A2 (x1 + x2, x3 σ2, σ3 ) B1 ( x1 σ1σ−1
2
) − A2 (x1 + x2, x3 σ1, σ3 ) B1 ( x2 σ2σ−1
1
) − A1 (x1 + x2 + x3 σ1 ) B2 ( x2, x3 σ2σ−1
1 , σ3σ−1 1
) − A2 (x1, x2 + x3 σ1, σ2 ) B1 ( x3 σ3σ−1
2
) .
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 19 / 35
Lemma ([F-K, Lemma 1.10])
For any A ∈ ARI(Γ), aritu(A) forms a derivation of ARI(Γ) with respect to the product ×, that is, for any B, C ∈ ARI(Γ), we have aritu(A)(B × C) = aritu(A)(B) × C + B × aritu(A)(C). The bilinear map ariu : ARI(Γ)⊗2 → ARI(Γ) is defined by ariu(A, B) := aritu(B)(A) − aritu(A)(B) + [A, B] for A, B ∈ ARI(Γ). Here, we have [A, B] := A × B − B × A.
Proposition ([F-K, Proposition 1.12])
The Q-linear space ARI(Γ) forms a Lie algebra under the ariu-bracket.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 20 / 35
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 21 / 35
generated by XZ (i.e. AX is the Q-linear space generated by X •
Z).
X → AX which is linearly defined by
∅ ω := ω ∅ := w and uω vη := u(ω vη) + v(uω η), for u, v ∈ XZ and ω, η ∈ X •
Z.
Q-algebra. We define the family { Sh (ω;η
α
)}
ω,η,α∈X •
Z in Z by
ω η = ∑
α∈X •
Z
Sh (ω; η α ) α.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 22 / 35
Definition ([F-K, Definition 1.4])
A mould M ∈ ARI(Γ) is called alternal if ∑
α∈X •
Z
Sh ((x1, ..., xp
σ1, ..., σp
) ; (xp+1, ..., xp+q
σp+1, ..., σp+q
) α ) Mp+q(α) = 0, for all p, q ⩾ 1. The Q-linear space ARI(Γ)al is defined to be the subset of moulds M ∈ ARI(Γ) which are alternal.
Proposition ([F-K, Proposition 1.13])
The Q-linear space ARI(Γ)al forms a Lie subalgebra of ARI(Γ) under the ariu-bracket. cf.) The above proposition for Γ = {e} is shown in [SaSch, Appendix A].
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 23 / 35
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) by Mm (σ1, ..., σm x1, ..., xm ) for each element
M ∈ ARI(Γ) to distinguish it from an element in ARI(Γ). (For M ∈ ARI(Γ), Mm
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) is denoted by Mm (x1, ..., xm σ1, ..., σm
) )
swap(M)m ( σ1, . . . , σm x1, . . . , xm ) = Mm ( xm, xm−1 − xm, . . . , x2 − x3, x1 − x2 σ1 · · · σm, σ1 · · · σm−1, . . . , σ1σ2, σ1 )
for any mould M = ( Mm (x1, ..., xm
σ1, ..., σm
)) ∈ ARI(Γ).
ARI(Γ)al/al := {M ∈ ARI(Γ)al | swap(M) ∈ ARI(Γ)al, M1 (x1
σ1
) = M1 (
−x1 σ−1
1
) }.
Proposition ([F-K, Proposition 1.21])
The Q-linear space ARI(Γ)al/al forms a Lie subalgebra of ARI(Γ)al under the ariu-bracket.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 24 / 35
push(M)m(
x1, . . . , xm σ1, . . . , σm
) = Mm( −x1 − · · · − xm,
x1, . . . , xm−1 σ−1
m ,
σ1σ−1
m ,
. . . , σm−1σ−1
m
) , pus(N)m(
σ1, . . . , σm x1, . . . , xm
) = Nm(
σm, σ1, . . . , σm−1 xm, x1, . . . , xm−1
) , for M ∈ ARI(Γ) and N ∈ ARI(Γ).
push(M) = M, and call a mould N ∈ ARI(Γ) pus-neutral when we have
m
∑
i=1
pusi(N)m (σ1, ..., σm
x1, ..., xm
) = ∑
i∈Z/mZ
Nm (σi+1, ..., σi+m
xi+1, ..., xi+m
) = 0, for all m ⩾ 1 and σ1, . . . , σm ∈ Γ.
is push-invariant and whose swap(M) ∈ ARI(Γ) is pus-neutral.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 25 / 35
Theorem ([F-K, Theorem 1.28])
The set ARI(Γ)push/pusnu forms a Lie subalgebra of ARI(Γ) under the ariu-bracket. The set ARI(Γ)al/al is encoded with the depth filtration {Film
DARI(Γ)al/al}m≥0 where Film DARI(Γ)al/al is the collection of moulds
M ∈ ARI(Γ)al/al with Mr(x1, . . . , xr) = 0 for r < m. The Lie algebra structure of ARI(Γ)al/al is compatible with the depth filtration.
Theorem ([F-K, Theorem 3.13])
There is an embedding Fil2
DARI(Γ)al/al ֒
→ ARI(Γ)push/pusnu
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 26 / 35
variables x and yσ (σ ∈ Γ) with deg x = deg yσ = 1. Here Lw is the Q-linear space generated by Lie monomials whose total degree is w.
A = Q⟨x, yσ; σ ∈ Γ⟩ is regarded as the universal enveloping algebra of L.
τ(x) = x and τ(yσ) = yτσ.
πY : A ↠ A/A · x ≃ Q ⊕ (⊕σ∈ΓAyσ) ֒ → A, and q to be the Q-linear isomorphism on A defined by q(xe0yσ1xe1yσ2 · · · xer−1yσr xer ) = xe0yσ1xe1yσ2σ−1
1
· · · xer−1yσrσ−1
r−1xer . Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 27 / 35
Definition (Kashiwara-Vergne bigraded Lie algebra: [F-K, Definition 2.17])
Define lkrv(Γ)•• = ⊕w>1,d>0lkrv(Γ)w,d to be the bigraded Q-linear space, where lkrv(Γ)w,d is the Q-linear space consisting of ¯ F ∈ grd
DLw whose lift
F ∈ Fild
DLw satisfies the following relations:
[x, G] + ∑
τ∈Γ
[yτ, τ(F)] ≡ 0 mod Fild+2
D
Lw+1, (LKV1) tr ◦ q ◦ πY (F(z; (yσ))) ≡ 0 mod tr(Fild+1
D
Aw) (LKV2) for a certain G = G(F) ∈ Lw. Here, we put z = −x − ∑
σ∈Γ yσ.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 28 / 35
for finitely many m. It is called polynomial-valued when Mm
σ1,...,σm(x1, . . . , xm) ∈ Q[x1, . . . , xm] for all (σ1, . . . , σm) ∈ Γ⊕m and m.
finite polynomial-valued moulds in M(F; Γ) (resp. ARI(Γ)). We note that ARI(Γ)fin,pol forms a Lie subalgebra of ARI(Γ).
Theorem ([F-K, Theorem 2.22])
We have an isomorphism of bigraded Q-linear spaces lkrv(Γ)•• ≃ ARI(Γ)push/pusnu ∩ ARI(Γ)fin,pol
al
.
Theorem ([F-K, Theorem 2.23])
The space lkrv(Γ)•• forms a bigraded Lie algebra.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 29 / 35
teru(M)m( x1,
. . . , xm σ1, . . . , σm
) := Mm( x1,
. . . , xm σ1, . . . , σm
) + 1 um { Mm−1( x1,
. . . , xm−2, xm−1 + xm σ1, . . . , σm−2, σm−1
) − Mm−1( x1,
. . . , xm−1 σ1, . . . , σm−1
)} .
for M ∈ ARI(Γ).
teru(M) = push ◦ mantar ◦ teru ◦ mantar(M), which is called the senary relation. Here, the map mantar : ARI(Γ) → ARI(Γ) is given by mantar(M)m(
x1, . . . , xm σ1, . . . , σm
) := (−1)m−1Mm(
xm, . . . , x1 σm, . . . , σ1
) .
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 30 / 35
Definition ([F-K, Definition 2.14])
We define the Q-linear space ARI(Γ)sena/pusnu to be the subset of moulds M in ARI(Γ) which satisfy the senary relation and whose swap satisfy the pus-neutrality. It is easy to know that mantar ◦ mantar = id and grD(teru) = id. Hence, we get an embedding of Q-linear space grDARI(Γ)sena/pusnu ֒ → ARI(Γ)push/pusnu.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 31 / 35
Definition ([F-K, Definition 2.1])
Define krv(Γ)• = ⊕w≥2krv(Γ)w to be the graded Q-linear space, where krv(Γ)w is the Q-linear space consisting of Lie elements F ∈ Lw which satisfies the following relations: [x, G] + ∑
τ∈Γ
[yτ, τ(F)] = 0, (KV1) tr ◦ q ◦ πY (F(z; (yσ))) = 0 (KV2) for a certain G = G(F) ∈ Lw.
Remark (conditions of lkrv(Γ)••)
[x, G] + ∑
τ∈Γ
[yτ, τ(F)] ≡ 0 mod Fild+2
D
Lw+1, (LKV 1) tr ◦ q ◦ πY (F(z; (yσ))) ≡ 0 mod tr(Fild+1
D
Aw). (LKV 2)
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 32 / 35
Remark
We see that the above krv(Γ)• with Γ = {e} recovers the original Kashiwara-Vergne Lie algebra denoted by krv0
2 introduced in [A-T] and the
depth¿1-part of krv introduced in [Raphael-Schneps, Definition 3].
Theorem ([Theorem 2.15])
We have an isomorphism of filtered Q-linear spaces krv(Γ)• ≃ ARI(Γ)sena/pusnu ∩ ARI(Γ)fin,pol
al
.
Remark ([F-K, Theorem 2.22])
There is an isomorphism of bigraded Q-linear spaces lkrv(Γ)•• ≃ ARI(Γ)push/pusnu ∩ ARI(Γ)fin,pol
al
.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 33 / 35
1 It is also not clear if krv(Γ)• forms a Lie algebra or not.
Is krv(Γ)• a Lie algebra?
2 The existence of an embedding
Fil2
DARI(Γ)al/il ֒
→ ARI(Γ)teru/pusnu. (cf. In our paper, we proved that there is an embedding Fil2
DARI(Γ)al/al ֒
→ ARI(Γ)push/pusnu).
3 In [A-T], Lie algebras krv0
n (n ≥ 1) are introduced, and in
[Alekseev-Kawazumi-Kuno-Naef], Lie algebras krvn (n ≥ 2) are also
n and krvn are
related to our krv(Γ)•.
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 34 / 35
Nao KOMIYAMA ACPMS 27/11/2020 35 / 35