Academic drug discovery in Europe Kiel 28 th June 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

academic drug discovery in europe
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Academic drug discovery in Europe Kiel 28 th June 2012 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Academic drug discovery in Europe Kiel 28 th June 2012 contact@screeningport.com www.screeningport.com Drug Discovery Living with Failure The innovation gap updated Top level figures 4300 companies involved in R+D 261 organizations =


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kiel 28th June 2012 contact@screeningport.com www.screeningport.com

Academic drug discovery in Europe

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Drug Discovery Living with Failure

slide-3
SLIDE 3

All figs from Munos 2009 Nature Drug Discovery

One solution to constant NME output: Harness the ‘global brain’ to access the best science and ideas wherever they may be. Such open architecture for R&D has key advantages: it heightens competition, reduces costs and increases agility by making it easier to initiate and terminate projects. More importantly, it makes it easier to manage ‘disruptive innovation’ by locating it outside the corporate walls (Munos 2009),

The innovation gap updated

Top level figures

  • 4300 companies involved in R+D
  • 261 organizations = 1,222 NMEs. (6% of all companies)
  • 21 companies = ~600 NMEs.
  • 70% Pharma mergers reduce NME output
  • Small company (not top 15) success rate < 0.1 NME pa
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Industry response to the innovation gap

Data and IP pooling New collaboration models Talking the talk

slide-5
SLIDE 5

> 70 Screening Centres Frearson and Collie 2009 Clinical and Translational Science Centres USA Planned 60 centres > $500 million

  • f NIH funds

Initiatives in Europe http://www.ncrr.nih.gov/ http://imi.europa.eu http://www.eatris.eu/ http://www.eu-

  • penscreen.eu/

Academic Initiatives in Drug Discovery

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lead Finding in Big Pharma

slide-7
SLIDE 7

European Academic Screening Centres – 2011 figures

European, approx 27% of the total (64% USA) Typically cover all main target classes For all centres, average of 13 targets p/a Most centres screen < 1 million wells per year

All figures courtesy of John Comley - HTStec’s ‘Academic Outreach and Screening Trends 2011’ Report

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Regional and centralised drug discovery facilities

  • Assay development, compound logistics and Screening facilities on par with what might be found

in small and medium Biotechnology organisation

  • Assay biology and targets originate from Institutional or regional networks (eg Max Planck),

Scottish Universities etc) but also free to bring in external targets from other institutions

  • Large libraries > 200k and facilities to profile (ADME, tox, Med-chem, Computational)
  • Diverse, fragment and focussed sets with emphasis on small molecules
  • Integrated robotics and workstation based infrastructures
  • Emphasis on drug discovery (eg tropical diseases) as well as Chemical Biology
  • Staff led typically by experienced ex-Pharma scientists
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pan European Initiatives on horizon

Implementation Phase Oct 2011

Implementation 2013

http://imi.europa.eu http://www.eatris.eu/ http://www.eu-openscreen.eu/

European Lead factory

Scale will be less than MLP, but still order of magnitude > than previous efforts (ChemBioNet etc)

Implementation 2013/2014

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ESP Centralized Screening Hub

Compound Management HTS System

Target +

  • Biol. IP

Project Basic Funding by Funding BMBF and Shareholders Validated Hit:

  • xC50
  • Cytotox
  • Cyp P450
  • Apoptosis
  • Biol. IP + Chem. IP
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Chemistry

Evotec Library

  • 250.000 cpds
  • Proven track

record ESP Library

  • proof of concept /

known drug library

  • Joint academic

ChemBioNet ViSoR

  • Virtual system for

molecular docking

ESP infrastructure

Infrastructure Services

Project development:

  • Funding support
  • Grant applications
  • Build up consortia

Project prosecution:

  • Assay

Development

  • Screening (prim.,

sec., HC, fragment based)

  • Hit Validation

In Operation August 2008

Microsoft Office PowerPoint Presentation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Chemical Libraries at ESP

  • Access to Evotec Library
  • Σ = 250,000 compounds (cpds)
  • Enamine Library hosted
  • Σ = 200,000 compounds (cpds)

(70% diverse, gene and target family including PPI’s)

  • ESP Library
  • Σ = 35,000 compounds (NP’s, lead-

like synthetic, 10% blinded)

  • Access to Hypha Discovery
  • Σ = 10,000 compounds
slide-13
SLIDE 13

1

Evotec small molecule library

R small molecule 13

Access to Evotec Library

  • Σ = 250,000 compounds (cpds)
  • 20k Additional fragment based library
  • All cpds QC-checked (LC/MS)
  • Optimized cpd storage for long term stability
  • Proven enhanced hit-rate from focussed

sets

  • Cpd design guided by Lipinski’s Rule-of-Five

and knowledge-based filters to enhance drug likeness

  • Privileged scaffolds and drug-like

functionality complimented with extensive use

  • f proprietary building blocks
  • More than 40 different structural cpd classes
  • Cpd preparation via validated, synthetic

routes ensuring rapid access to analogues

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ESP Library - Blinded

  • 2000 compounds Natural products and synthetic

molecules from a German research Institute

  • 300 compounds - anti infectives from a German

research Institute

  • Future – an additional 1000 marine derived Natural

products from a German research Institutes These compounds have a less straightforward IP position but are available for screening in all projects

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hypha Discovery Library

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Case Study 1 North American University Indication Neurodegenerative disease Target Protease

  • Assay development
  • Using full length protein substrate
  • TRF readout with antibody detection of cleavage site
  • enzyme titration, kinetics of substrate turnover, standard

compound profiling

  • DMSO tolerance, day-to-day and plate-to-plate variability
  • HTS campaign
  • Primary screen 23k compounds
  • Hit Confirmation in Primary 11pt dose response
  • Hit characterization 2 additional orthogonal assay formats
  • Secondary assay 1 – Luminescence
  • Secondary assay 2 - Fluorescence
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Protein substrate [µM]

log10 [inhibitor] M

Substrate Km

5µl assay volume

TR- FRET signal TR-FRET signal Z’ TR-FRET signal Z’

Screening and Profiling 23k cpds

Pharmacology DMSO tolerance Screen Stats Primary screen Secondary screens

Lumi Fluor

1.1% Hit rate @ 30% cut - off

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case Study 2 German Research Institute Indication Malaria Target Synthesis of an essential co-factor Assay development

  • Hetro-dimer complex
  • Coupled detection of synthase

product

  • Enzyme titration and kinetics, (no

standard compounds)

  • DMSO tolerance, day-to-day and

plate-to-plate variability

HTS campaign

  • Primary screen 250k compounds
  • Hit Confirmation 2500 compounds
  • Hit Profiling 512 compounds
  • Secondary assay parasite

proliferation assay in human rbc’s (Safety Level 3)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000

  • 4.5
  • 3.5
  • 2.5
  • 1.5
  • 0.5

0.5

RFU

log(concentration) [µM] Protein 1 + protein 2 Protein 1 Protein 2

Assay Development (3 months)

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Slope uncorrected Slope corrected
  • Conc. of Pdx1 [µM]
v [1/s] 20 40 60 200 400 600 800 1000 Glutamine Concentration [mM] v [1/s]

200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 1600000 1800000 2000000 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.50 2 4 0 (High Ctrl) 0 (Low Ctrl) RFU DMSO conc. [%]

A B

Reagent production Enzyme titrations Heterodimer functional testing DMSO Tolerance Marker Mini-screen

slide-20
SLIDE 20

384 well Plates screened 945 (plus DMSO sacrificial plates) Plate QC failures 104 Median Z’ 0.72 Screened cpds 251,000 Hit Rate 1.4% (3607) Confirmation Pick size 2500

Primary Screening Statistics

  • Compound Triage by expert Medicinal Chemist
  • Structural classification and selection based on potency and attractiveness as

starting points

  • Prioritized hits from known drug library to facilitate re-purposing
slide-21
SLIDE 21

B E C

Confirmation and Counter Assay

Counter Assay 1

  • Detection system only
  • 1uM Glutamate
  • >50% Compounds

inhibit detection system

  • Crucial readout

Putative Hits Inhibit ors of detection Confirmation assay

  • Primary in triplicate
  • 80% Hit recovery
  • Significant # “super”

inhibitors – artefacts? Counter Assay 2

  • Run reaction as primary
  • Add compound then read
  • Quenchers false +ve
  • Fluorescent false -ve
  • Resorufin produces robust

signal! Fluorescent cpds Quenching cpds

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Dose Response + Hit profiling

10 20 30 40 50 60 0.1 0.4 0.7 1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.1 3.4 3.7 4 4.3 4.6 4.9 Frequency Binned Hill slope 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Frequency Binned pIC50

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.3 3.7 4.1 4.5 4.9 Frequency Binned Hill slope 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Frequency 8.5

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 50 100 150 200 Ratio IC50 (Primary / Counter) Compound

Primary Assay - 497 compounds (of 512) with curve fits Counter Assay - 200 compounds (of 512) with curve fits (IC-50 Primary) / (IC-50 Counter)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Marine Fungi Project – Drug discovery

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 23

The aim is to identify specific marine fungi derived compounds which are suitable starting points for drug discovery. Parties in Drug Discovert Worrking groups: ESP, GEOMAR, UIO (Oslo), DTI (Denmark), Hypha discovery (UK)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cell line panel

  • NCI cell line panel

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 24

sourced all 60 cell lines Preliminary panel consisting of M14, 786-0, MCF-7 and HL-60 cell culture protocols set up for 20 cell lines

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Efficacy assessment assays at 3 sites

  • Profile compounds effects on growth and viability of

NCI panel

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 25 ESP ESP UIO UIO HD HD Cell Titer Glo Luminescence Viability Assay (Promega Corp., US) Neutral Red Assay toluylene red stains lysosomes in living cells

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Methods

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 26

NCI cancer cell line screen

Concentrations at 50% cell growth (GI50), 0% cell growth (TGI) and -50% cell growth (LC50) were collected for each cell line per compound.

Aim: Screening of interesting compounds in the whole panel to

  • btain GI50, TGI and LC50 in each cell line
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Optimisation of protocols

  • 3D cell culture (BioLevitator)

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 27 SF-593 A549-ATCC M14 786-0

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Bioinformatics tools for Cpd analysis

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 28

data GI50 TGI LC50 COMPARE

  • nline tool

NCI Mean graph Output Correlation

  • f test

compounds to known compounds MoA studies Target directed studies

NCI Mean Graph TGIs of compound 954 in 8 cell lines displayed relative to the mean (MG MID) of -4.48 log molar . Unit: log molar

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Assay Validation

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 29

NCI cancer cell lines

Cell growth inhibition and Cytotoxicity assay validated for 17 cell lines Validation includes:

  • DMSO tolerance
  • Titration/Linearity experiments
  • Signal stability experiments
  • Cell growth evaluation
  • Standard compound dose-response experiments

(cisplatin, paclitaxel, staurosporine, 6-mercaptopurine) Selected fractions and pure compounds screened in preliminary panel and all other validated cell lines

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Purified compound – Example results

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 30

About 300 compounds screened in the preliminary panel Hits identified and profiled in 17 cell lines (ESP&UIO)

  • Compound A

Dose-response curve compound 525n in SF-539

slide-31
SLIDE 31

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 31

Profiling results (DRC) pure compounds mean graphs in all screened cell lines for COMPARE algorithm

Mean graph of compound B in 8 cell lines

Purified compound studies

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Marine Fungi Project

24.09.2013 Marine Fungi - WP7 MGA May 2012 32

Project on track to deliver in-vitro Proof of Concept (2013)

1H 2012 2013 2011 / 2012 2011

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ESP Enabling Technologies group Partner with Bioassay Discovery Tools Company (USA) Validation of new reagent portfolio for epigenetic targets

HDA CS and t heir in hibit io ns in c ancer cells (Wit t et al; C an c er L ett er s 277 (2009); 8-21) C huang et al; Tr en ds in Neur
  • s c .; V
  • l 32, No 11,
591-601 HDA C inhibit ior s in CNS d isor ders (K az ant s ev, Tho mpson; Nat ur e Rev. Dr ug Dis c. Oct 2008; Vo l 7; 854-868) c las s i sofor m plays r
  • l e in
substrates pan inhibitor s clas s I i nhibitor s c lass II inhibitor s func tion in c ancer cells func tion in C NS knock out phenotypes (i n mice) c ancerC NS inflam-mation TSA SAH A L A Q824Panobi - nostat B eli - nostat PCI- 24781 MS-275 MGCD
  • 0103
Depsi - peptide A pic idi n V PA Tr apoxi n SB- 429201 B i s-Pyr i- di ni-um diene SH I-1:2 R 306465 SB-379- 278A PCI- 34051 Cpd2 APH A deriva tives Tuba-ci n Mercapt
  • -acet-
amide NCT- 10a/ 14a Sur am i n Nic otinami de TSA Na- Buty- r ate V PA benz - amide s M344 EX-527 I 1 Y Y Y p53, MyoD , E2F-1, Stat3, andr
  • gen
cer vic al c ancer cells : H D AC1 knoc kdown r es ults in i nhibiti on
  • f pr
  • lifer
ati on and i nducti on of autophagy; os teos arcoma and br eas t c anc er cell s : knoc kdown c aus es c ell cyc l e ar res t, growth i nhibiti on, apoptosi s; c olon c ancer cells : knockdown suppres ses growth; pros tate c ancer : over expr ess ion incr eases prol ifer ation and dedifferentiati on; neur
  • bl as toma cell s:
knockdown sensi tiz es for chem
  • ther
apy; CLL c ells : knockdown sensi tiz es for TRAIL apoptos is R ett Syndr
  • me
ac c umulating evidenc e suppor ts the notion that his tone hypoac etyl ation and transc r i ptional dysfunction ar e i nvol ved in a lar ge number
  • f
neur
  • degenar
tive c onditi ons in vivo and in vitro; tar geti ng his tone ac etylati on may pr
  • vide
benefi t for the tr eatment
  • f depr
ess ion, sc hi zophr enia, dr ug addic tion and anxiety dis or der s ; Ru binstein
  • Taybi s yndr
  • m
e: ubiqui tous r
  • les of CB
P and p300 in al l tiss ues , and the r ec ent data suggesting an impr
  • vement in long-
ter m memor y and s ynapti c pl as tic ity by the H DA C i nhibitor tr ic ho- s tati n A (TSA ) thr
  • ugh its
effect on CB P and CREB; Friedr eic h ’s ataxia: expans ion of a tr i pl et r epeat r egion wi thi n an intr
  • n in the fr
ataxi n gene (FXN), whi ch enc odes a hi ghly c ons erved mitoc hondr i al pr
  • tein, l eads to
tr ans cript-i onal s ilenc ing i n the neuro- degener ative di seas e Friedr eic h’s ataxia (s ee Benz amide H D AC inhibitors); Fr agile X synd r
  • me: benz ami de-
bas ed H DA C i nhibitor s reversed fr ataxi n- medi ated s ilenc ing, SIRT1 inhi bi tion r ever s es hetero-chr
  • mati n-
medi ated s ilenc ing of the FMR 1 loc us by incr easi ng ac etyl ati on and dec r eas ing methyl ation
  • f his tones. Ther
efor e, phar maco-l ogic al i nhibiti on of SIRT1 c oul d pr
  • vide an alternative
s trategy to r eac tivate FMR1 expres si on and to reverse the los s of a requi r ed neuronal pr
  • tein; als o involved i n
St ro ke, Hu nt in gt
  • n
' s d iseas e, ALS, SMA, Parkins o ns d iseas es, A lzheimer s dis eas e embr yo nic let hal day 9.5, p21 and p27 upr egulation, r educ ed over all H DA C ac tivity 2 Y Y Y Bcl -6, Stat3, glucoc or tic oi d, rec eptor , YY-1 cer vic al c ancer cells : H D AC 2 knoc kdown res ul ts in di ffer entiation, apoptosi s and p53 independent p21 expr ess ion; breas t c anc er cell s: increased p53 acti vi ty, inhi bi tion of prol ifer ation, induction of senes cence, i nduc ti on
  • f apoptos is ; c olon c anc er c el ls: knockdown c auses g
rowth arr est; neur
  • bl as toma cells : knockdown induc es apoptos is ;
genetic H D AC 2 mutation r educ es intestinal tumor devel opment i n A PC mic e i n vi vo; CL L c ells : knockdown sensi tiz es for TRAIL-apoptos is R ett Syndr
  • me, Spi nal Mus cular
Atr
  • phy
(SM A) viable unti l perinatal per i od, fatal m ulit ple, c ard iac defec t s , exc ess ive hyper plasi a of hear t mus cle, arr ythmi a 3 Y Y Y GATA-1, RelA, Stat3, MEF2D, YY-1, SHP A PL c ell s: H D AC3 as soc iated with PML -RA Ra fusi on pr
  • tei n,
knockdown induc es differ entiation genes ; A ML : A ML -1-ETO binds HDAC 3 (and HDAC s 1, 2), di srupts c el l c yc le embr yo nic let hal befor e day 9.5, defective c ell c ycl e, D NA r epai r and apoptosi s in embr yonic fibroblas ts. C
  • nditional l iver
knoc k out r esults i n hepatocyte and i nduc ti on of metaboli c genes hyper tr
  • phy
8 Y Y Y nd neur
  • blas tom
a c ells : H D AC 8 knoc kdown i nduc es di ffer entiation, c ell c ycl e ar res t and inhibits c lonogenic growth; lung, c olon, cer vic al c ancer cells : knockdown of H D AC8 reduces proli fer ation R ett Syndr
  • me
nd IIa 4 Y Y GCMa, GA TA-1, H P-1 A PL c ell s : H DA C4 inter acts wi th PL ZF-RAR a fus ion pr
  • tein,
r epres ses differ entiation genes ; renal c arci noma cells : knockdown inhi bi ts expr es s ion and func tional ac tivity of H IF- 1a viable, pr ematur e and ec topic
  • s si fic ation, chondr
  • cyte hyper
trophy; fr
  • m the r
elated c ar di ac field, i t is notewor thy that knoc kdown of HDAC 4 r educ ed i nfar c t si ze foll owing m yocar dial i sc hemia-induc ed r eper fusi on i njur y 5 Y Y Smad7, H P-1, GCMa erythroleukemia : HDAC 5 s huttles fr
  • m
nuc leus to c ytoplas m upon differ enti ation, inter acts wi th GA TA-1 seems to mediate antidepres sant activity in animal s tudies (Na-Butyr ate) m yocar dial hyper trophy, abnor mal car diac s tres s r espons e 7 Y Y FLAG 1 and 2 endothelial cells : HDAC 7 s ilencing alter s morphology, migr ation and tube-for mi ng c apaci ty embr yo nic let hal, l ac k of endothelial cell-cell adhes ion 9 Y nd nd viable at bir th, spontaneous myocar dial hyper tr
  • phy
IIb 6 Y Y a-Tubul in, H SP90, SH P, Smad7 Tar geted i nhibiti on of H DA C6 l eads to ac etylati on of H SP90 and disrupti on of i ts chaper
  • ne function, r
esulting i n depletion of pro-growth and pro-s ur vival cl ient proteins incl uding the Bc r
  • Abl onc opr
  • tein i n K562 l eukemic c el ls;
H D AC6 targeting bloc ks EGF induc ed nuc lear transl oc ation of ß-cateni n and c-myc expr ess ion in c olon c ar c inom a c ells ; knockdown of H DA C6 caus es donwregul ation of HIF-1a, V EGFR 1/2; HDAC 6 invovled in TGFb induc ed epi theli al - mes enc hymal transi tion of lung c ar c inoma cell s viable, no si gnifi cant defec ts , i nc r eas e in global tubuli n ac etylati on. MEFs fai l to r ec over fr
  • m oxidative str
es s 10 Y H SP90 ? Knockdown of H DA C10 downr egulates V EGFR nd IV 11 nd nd nd III SIR T1 Y Y i nhibited inhi bited i nhibited fr agi le X syndrome SIR T2 Y i nhibited inhi bited SIR T3 inhi bited SIR T4 inhi bited SIR T5 inhi bited SIR T6 inhi bited SIR T7 inhi bited cl inic al tr i al phases I, II, III, appr
  • ved
C TCL II, III I, II II II I, II I, II in c linic a l tr i al s for treatm ent of SMA l eukemia, advanc ed solid tumors, lymphomas nd: no data MEF: mous e embr yonic fi br
  • blasts
s tr
  • ng inhibition (EC50 < 5fold EC
50 r elative to most sensitive HDAC isofor m weak i nhibiti on (EC50 > 5fol d EC50 rel ati ve to mos t s ens itive H D AC is oform no inhi bition (EC50 > 100fold EC50 r elative to mos t s ens itive H D AC is oform no data publi shed

Epigenetic targets ESP Library ESP Infrastructure ESP Expertise Novel assay Limited validation

Enzyme (nM)

Industrialised format HTS compatibility Market Validation

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Open Innovation in Practice: Neu2 - A Competence Consortium in MS

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Neu2 Project flow

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Neu2 - Competence Cascade

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Positioning of Neu2 portfolio

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Neu2 Project portfolio April 2012

Activities

  • Hit Finding – Phase II trial
  • ScreeningPort involved in 3 running

projects

  • 2 new MS Biomarker related projects

accepted for next round

  • 1 new target for comprehensive Hit

finding Scope and project finances

  • Acute focus on Multiple Sclerosis
  • Novel mechanisms favoured
  • Higher risk than typical portfolio
  • BMBF 25Mio first 3 years
  • all projects need counter-financing
  • No “double funding” allowed
  • Renewal process mid 2012, goal is to

secure additional 3 – 5 years funding

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Summary

  • Pharma companies are increasingly moving out of early

Discovery being replaced by Universities and Biotech

  • Academic drug discovery is a vibrant activity, but the

impact in terms of addressing unmet patient needs has yet to be fully realised

  • Sources of compounds for Hi finding and Lead identification

is increasingly varied and natural products still have a significant role to play

  • Academia should not try to replicate Industry activities,

rather to complement and be prepared to take on greater risks