a variational formula for functionals of fbm and
play

A variational formula for functionals of fBM and applications to - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A variational formula for functionals of fBM and applications to LDPs Andr e de Oliveira Gomes IMECC-UNICAMP, Campinas SP, Brasil Escola Brasileira de Probabilidade XXIII-2019 S ao Carlos, SP Brazil joint work with Pedro Catuogno


  1. A variational formula for functionals of fBM and applications to LDPs Andr´ e de Oliveira Gomes IMECC-UNICAMP, Campinas SP, Brasil Escola Brasileira de Probabilidade XXIII-2019 S˜ ao Carlos, SP Brazil joint work with Pedro Catuogno (IMECC-UNICAMP) 26 July 2019

  2. Overview 1. The baby problem. 2. Features of the fBM. 3. A Quick tour on the weak convergence approach to LDT. 4. A variational formula for bounded measurable functionals of fBM. 5. A sufficient condition for LDPs of SDEs driven by fBM. 7. Donsker-Varadhan LDPs.

  3. The starting point- the baby problem We would like to understand the deviations in an exponentially small scale, when ε → 0, of the solutions of the following SDEs  d  dZ ε, z = V 0 ( Z ε, z � V i ( Z ε, z ) ◦ dX i  ) dt + ε t ,  t t t (1) i =1  Z ε, z = z ,   0 where ( X t ) t ≥ 0 := ( X 1 t , . . . , X d t ) t ≥ 0 is a d -dimensional Gaussian process and V 0 , . . . , V d is a collection of smooth vector fields: R n − → R .

  4. The fractional Brownian Motion The driving signal ( X t ) t ≥ 0 is a fractional Brownian motion (fBM) with Hurst parameter H ∈ (0 , 1), that is, X = B H , where B H is a centered Gaussian process with covariance given by s ] = 1 � | t | 2 H + | s | 2 H − | t − s | 2 H � R H ( s , t ) = E [ B H t B H 2 Remark 2 the process B H is a standard Brownian motion. If H = 1

  5. Features of the fBM 1. Self-similarity: For any a > 0, one has { B H ( at ) | t ≥ 0 } = d { a H B H ( t ) | t ≥ 0 } . It results from the structure of the covariance function. 2. Stationary increments: { B H ( t + h ) − B H ( h ) } = d { B H ( t ) } , for every h > 0. 3. Independent increments:no!! fBMs have independent increments iff H = 1 2 and in this case E [ B H t B H s ] = t ∧ s . When H � = 1 2 the increments are not independent. When H > 1 2 the increments are positively correlated; if H < 1 2 they are negatively correlated. 4. Long range dependence: Let ( X t ) t ≥ 0 be an H -self similar process with stationary increments and non degenerate for all t ≥ 0 with E [ | X 1 | 2 ] < ∞ . Write ξ n = X n +1 − X n and r ( n ) = E [ ξ (0) ξ ( n )], for all n ≥ 0. For 1 2 < H < 1 we have � n | r n | = ∞ and this property is called long range dependence .

  6. Features of the fBM 5 Markovian pp: A Gaussian process with covariance R is Markovian iif R ( s , u ) = R ( s , t ) R ( s , u ) , s ≤ t ≤ u . R ( t , t ) The fBM is Markovian iif H = 1 2 . 6. β -H¨ older continuity: fBM admits a modification which is H¨ older continuous of order β iif β ∈ (0 , H ). The value of the Hurst parameter decides the regularity of the sample paths. 7. Differentiability: fBM is a.s. nowhere differentiable. 8. p-variation: fBM has bounded p -variation when p > 1 H and unbounded p-variation when p < 1 H . 9. It is not a semimartingale. If B H t = A H t + M H t for all t ≥ 0, by Doob-Meyer, when H < 1 2 we have [ M H ] t = ∞ and | A H t | TV = ∞ if H > 1 2 . Therefore no stochastic calculus. NO ITO!!!

  7. Features of the fBM � t u s dB H 10. How to define s ? 0 i) When H > 1 2 one uses Young’s integral. � � 1 3 , 1 ii) When H ∈ one uses RPtheory (Coutin, Hairer, 2 Baudoin, Gubinelli...) iii) Nualart’s antecipative calculus via the divergence operator (Skorohod integral) We choose Rough Paths theory.

  8. LDP: the weak convergence approach Let ( X ε ) ε> 0 be a family of r.vs defined on (Ω , F , P ) with values in a complete separable metric space E (Polish). • A function I : E − → [0 , ∞ ] is called a good rate function if I is lower semicontinuous and if the sublevel sets { x ∈ E | I ( x ) ≤ c } are compact c ≥ 0. • The family ( X ε ) ε> 0 is said to satisfy a large deviations principle on E with the good rate function I if ε ln P ( X ε ∈ F ) ≤ − inf lim sup x ∈ F I ( x ) ε → 0 ε → 0 ε ln P ( X ε ∈ G ) ≥ − inf lim inf x ∈ G I ( x ) , for every F ∈ B ( E ) closed and G ∈ B ( E ) open.

  9. LDPs via the weak convergence approach • Laplace’s method: for any h ∈ C b ([0 , 1]) one has � 1 1 e − h ( x ) dx = − min lim n ln x ∈ [0 , 1] h ( x ) . n →∞ 0 • ( X ε ) ε> 0 a family of E -valued r.vs. is said to satisfy the Laplace-Varadhan principle with the good rate function I if � ε h ( X ε ) � e − 1 lim sup ε ln E ≤ − inf x ∈ E { I ( x ) + h ( x ) } , ε → 0 � ε h ( X ε ) � e − 1 lim inf ε → 0 ε ln E ≥ − inf x ∈ E { h ( x ) + I ( x ) } , for every h ∈ C b ( E ). • Since E is Polish LDP ⇔ LVP.

  10. The relative entropy • Let P ( E ) denote the set of probability measures defined on ( E , E ). Given µ ∈ P ( E ) we define R ( . || µ ) : P ( E ) − → [0 , ∞ ] given by �  ln d ν if ν ≪ µ and ln d ν d µ ∈ L 1 ( µ ) d µ ( x ) ν ( dx ) ,  R ( ν || µ ) := E ∞ , otherwise .  • Variational representation of Laplace functionals: Let h ∈ M b ( E ). Let µ ∈ P ( E ). Then � � � � e − h ( z ) µ ( dz ) = − ln inf R ( ν || µ ) + h ( z ) ν ( dz ) ν ∈P ( E ) E E and let ν 0 ∈ P ( E ) such that ν 0 ≪ µ and e − h d ν 0 d µ = E e − h d µ. � Then the infimum above is attained uniquely at ν 0 .

  11. Donsker-Varadhan representation • Let E be a Polish space and µ and ν in P ( E ). One has the representation � � � e f d µ � R ( ν || µ ) = sup fd ν − ln f ∈ C b ( E ) e E � � � � e φ d µ = sup φ d ν − ln . φ ∈ M b ( E ) e E • Laplace functionals and Relative entropies are convex conjugates in the duality of the Fenchel-Legendre transform.

  12. Fractional calculus associated to fBM • Given H ∈ (0 , 1) let H H be the reproducing kernel Hilbert space → R d such associated, which consists on the functions h : [0 , T ] − h ∈ L 2 that have the representation that ˙ � t K H ( t , s )˙ h ( t ) = h ( s ) ds , 0 where K H is the kernel defined by � � t � s � 1 � 1 2 − H � � K H ( t , s ) = c H ( t − s ) H − 1 ( u − s ) H − 3 2 + c H 2 − H 1 − du , 2 u s for some c H > 0. • The scalar product in H H is given by � h 1 , h 2 � H H = � ˙ h 1 , ˙ h 2 � L 2

  13. A bit of Gaussian analysis • For every t ∈ [0 , T ] we denote F B H the σ -field generated by the t random variables B H s , s ∈ [0 , t ] and the P -null sets. • We denote E the set of step functions on [0 , T ]. Let H be the Hilbert space defined as the closure of E wrt to the scalar product � 1 [0 , t ] , 1 [0 , s ] � H := R H ( t , s ) . • The map 1 [0 , t ] �→ B H can be extended to an isometry between t H and the Gaussian space H 1 ( B H ) associated with B H . We will denote this isometry by ϕ �→ B H ( ϕ ). • The covariance kernel can be written as � t ∧ s R H ( t , s ) = K H ( t , r ) K H ( s , r ) dr . 0

  14. A bit of Gaussian analysis • Consider the linear operator K ∗ → L 2 [0 , T ] given by H : E − � T ( ϕ ( r ) − ϕ ( s )) ∂ K H ( K ∗ H ϕ )( s ) = K H ( T , s ) ϕ ( s ) + ∂ r ( r , s ) dr . s • For any pair of step functions ϕ, ψ ∈ E we have � K ∗ H ϕ, K ∗ H ψ � L 2 [0 , T ] = � ϕ, ψ � H . • As a consequence the operator K ∗ H provides an isometry between H and L 2 [0 , T ] . Hence the process W = ( W t ) t ∈ [0 , T ] defined by W t = B H (( K ∗ H ) − 1 1 [0 , t ] ) is a Wiener process wrt to F B H and the process B H has an integral representation of the form � t B H t = K H ( t , s ) dW s , 0 since ( K ∗ H 1 [0 , t ] )( s ) = K H ( t , s ).

  15. Girsanov’s transform • Given an F B H -an adapted process ( u t ) t ∈ [0 , T ] and consider the transformation � t ˜ B H t = B H t + u s ds . 0 • We can write � t � t � t ˜ B H t = B H t + u s ds = K H ( t , s ) dW s + u s ds 0 0 0 � t K H ( t , s ) d ˜ = W s , 0 where � t � � . � � � ˜ K − 1 W t = W t + u s ds ( r ) dr H 0 0

  16. Girsanov transform Theorem Consider the shifted process ˜ B H . defined by the process ( u s ) s ∈ [0 , T ] with integrable paths. Assume that � . H + 1 • It holds that L 2 [0 , T ] P -a.s. 0 u s ds ∈ I 2 0+ • E [ E T ] = 1 where � T � . � T � . ( s ) dW s − 1 � 2 � � � � � K − 1 K − 1 E T = exp − u s ds u s ds ( s ) H H 2 0 0 0 0 B H is an F B H -fBM with Hurst parameter Then the shifted process ˜ P defined by d ¯ H under the new probability ¯ P d P = E T .

  17. A variational formula for bounded measurable functionals of fBM-cf. Dupuis-Ellis’s formula for BM Theorem For any f ∈ M b ( C ([0 , T ]; R d )) � e − f ( B H ) � − ln E � T � � . � . � 1 2 � � � � B H + �� � K − 1 = inf ( r ) dr + f . v ∈A E u s ds u s ds � � H 2 � 0 0 0 where A is the class of all d-dimensional F B H -progressively measurable t processes such that � � T � � . 2 � � �� � K − 1 u s ds < ∞ . E � � H � 0 0

  18. An idea of the proof • We start to see that − ln E [ f ( B H )] is bounded below by the right hand side. • Take v ∈ A b . Then Novikov’s condition (a bit hard) shows that � � t � . � t � . ( s ) dW s − 1 2 � � � � � � � K − 1 K − 1 M t := exp u r dr u r dr ( s ) ds � � H H 2 � � 0 0 0 0 is a martingale wrt to F B H . • Define the measure � A ∈ F B H Q ( A ) := M T d P , T . A � t • Girsanov yields, considering ˜ B H t = B H t − 0 u s ds � ln d Q R ( Q || P ) = d P d Q

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend