A review by Kurt Waldman, John Kerr and Katherine Groble Michigan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a review by kurt waldman john kerr and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A review by Kurt Waldman, John Kerr and Katherine Groble Michigan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A review by Kurt Waldman, John Kerr and Katherine Groble Michigan State University Prepared for GLWESS project workshop October 1, 2012 Mandatory for suppliers Profit-driven, mainly for food safety They raise producer costs and limit


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A review by Kurt Waldman, John Kerr and Katherine Groble Michigan State University

Prepared for GLWESS project workshop October 1, 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

 Mandatory for suppliers  Profit-driven, mainly for food safety  They raise producer costs and limit

market access to those who can comply

 They succeed when large buyers can

enforce them or when they become the industry standard.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

 Operates outside the supply chain  Rewards favorable practices with the

aim that consumers will pay extra

 Labels act as signals to consumers  Tends to cover small parts of the market

slide-8
SLIDE 8

 Consumer well-being (food safety)  Animal welfare  Producer well-being (fair trade and

worker protection)

 Environmental protection

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 Inside (business to business)

  • Mostly food safety
  • Labor standards (e.g. Nike)
  • Animal welfare (McDonald’s)

 Outside (Certification for consumers)

  • Mostly environmental conservation and fair trade
  • Public pressure to encourage better business

standards like Nike and McDonald’s

slide-10
SLIDE 10

 Food safety standards REQUIRED for ALL

PRODUCERS that supply large retailers

 Animal welfare standards are REQUIRED

for ALL PRODUCERS that supply McDonald’s

 Business-to-consumer certification

schemes cover tiny percentage of market

slide-11
SLIDE 11

 Core values: they care about these

things per se

 Also various sources of business risk

slide-12
SLIDE 12

 Input risk  Reputation risk  Regulatory risk

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 If environmental

degradation threatens supply of vital inputs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Officials link Chi-Chi's hepatitis

  • utbreak to green onions

 Publicity about bad behavior or bad

  • utcomes for consumers
slide-15
SLIDE 15

 Pre-emptive steps to maintain a good

reputation

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Government

regulation could be worse than standards that industry might self- impose

slide-17
SLIDE 17

 Input risk  Reputation risk  Regulatory risk

slide-18
SLIDE 18

 How the product is consumed  How the product is produced  Nature of the supply chain

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

 Will this increase the

likelihood that consumers impose pressure?

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

 Are conservation practices

costly?

 Are they visible?  Do all farms contribute

equally to the problem?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Local grain elevators Etha- nol Processors Corn

  • il

Bio- plas- tics Retailers Corn meal Corn syrup Other uses Retailers Retailers Retailers Retailers Retailers Millers/grinders Growers

Growers Processors Other Retailers

slide-27
SLIDE 27

 Aggregation is the norm for grains

  • Segregation raises costs. Is segregation necessary?
slide-28
SLIDE 28

 Outcome-based

  • Often a small number of farms contribute most of the

problem

  • Non-polluting farms needn’t adopt costly practices

 Low transaction costs

  • Need ways to identify main pollution sources and also

identify adopters of conservation practices

 Continuous improvement  Representation and fairness  Universal

slide-29
SLIDE 29

 What are the best options for

encouraging industry to agree to production standards that limit pollution

  • f Great Lakes waters?

 What are the most effective ways to

generate interest by consumers in demanding such standards?

 What approaches can minimize costs?