A NCA analysis of approval documents Paul AF Jansen, geriatrician, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a nca analysis of approval documents
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A NCA analysis of approval documents Paul AF Jansen, geriatrician, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A NCA analysis of approval documents Paul AF Jansen, geriatrician, clinical pharmacologist Dep Geriatrics and Ephor, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands 23 March 2012 Pre-authorization studies and the users of medicines Number of prescriptions in 2009


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A NCA analysis of approval documents

Paul AF Jansen, geriatrician, clinical pharmacologist

Dep Geriatrics and Ephor, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands 23 March 2012

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Pre-authorization studies and the users of medicines

Number of prescriptions in 2009 in the Netherlands

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Benefit/risk is changing

  • Evidence for benefit of

several medicines

  • Time until benefit is shorter

compared to younger adults

  • Safety is a problem because
  • f changes in PK/PD
  • Nerve system damage is

important

  • Decrease in kidney function
  • Decreased balance
  • Decreased thirst etc.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The consequences: HARM frail patients are at risk to be admitted to hospital because of ADR

  • Cognitive disturbance (HR 11,9; 3,9-36,3)
  • Polymorbidity > 5 (HR 8,7; 3,1-24,1)
  • decreased kidney function (HR 3,1; 1,9-

5,2)

  • not living independently (HR 3,0;1,4-6,5)
  • Polypharmacy (>5 HR 2,7; 1,8-3,9)
  • Adherence problems (HR 2,3; 1,4-3,8)

Leendertse et al. Arch Int Med 2008;168: 1890-6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is it true that older patients are not studied?

  • Which information is available in

the SmPC for appropriate prescribing in older persons?

  • Which information is available in

the EPAR for appropriate prescribing in older persons?

  • What is the compliance with the

almost 20 year old ICH E7 guideline?

Erna Beers Prof Bert Leufkens Prof Toine Egberts Dr Paul Jansen www.ephor.eu

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods

  • All non-generic products with a European

centralised marketing authorisation between 2008 and 2011 with complete dossiers, indicated for diseases in older individuals

  • The ICH E7 guideline was summarised in 19 items
slide-7
SLIDE 7

19 items of the ICH E7

  • Nature of the studied population ( 4 items)
  • Inclusion >65 and >75 years
  • Exclusion based on age
  • Exclusions based on common co-morbidity
  • Clinical experience in older patients (4 items)
  • Number >65 years
  • Age-related differences for efficacy, dose-response

and adverse events

  • Pharmacokinetic studies (8 items)
  • Drug-drug interaction studies (3 items)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Subdivision of available and missing information

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Results

  • 53 medicinal products
  • Neoplasms: 12 (23%)
  • Musculoskeletal system/connective tissue: 10 (19%)
  • Circulatory system: 8 (15%)
  • Endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases: 5 (9%)
  • Infectious diseases: 5 (9%)
  • Others: 13 (25%)
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Available, positive information

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Available, positive information per category

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Non-available information that should have been positive

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Non-available information that should have been positive per category

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions

  • Information on older persons, according to the ICH

E7 is relatively high available in the EPARs

  • However it is often not present in the SmPC
  • Especially information on common co-morbidities,
  • n age-related differences in efficacy and kind of PK

study in older persons are lacking

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Discussion: is the ICH E7 information what prescribers want?

  • Delphi study on the Information of Medicine

appropriateness in the Elderly (DIME)

  • Regulators found several items less important

compared to geriatricians/other experts:

  • The convenience of use for older persons (dosage

form and packaging)

  • The extent of renal clearance of the active

substances in old persons

  • No exclusion based on concomitant medical

conditions common in old persons

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What was left out

  • f the final Dime?
  • No exclusion based on concomitant medical conditions

common in old persons

  • A single-dose pharmacokinetic study in young versus old

persons

slide-17
SLIDE 17

DIME: extra items are needed (total items: 26)

  • No exclusion based on concomitant treatment

with drugs commonly prescribed for old persons

  • The post-marketing data collection in geriatric

patients is specified in the Risk Management Plan

  • The extent of drug accumulation in old persons
  • Information should be available about dosing

instructions

  • The convenience of use for older persons
slide-18
SLIDE 18

DIME: extra items are needed, especially about safety

  • Potential anticholinergic effects
  • Potential sedative effects
  • Potential orthostatic effects
  • Potential effects on the locomotor system
  • Potential cardiovascular side effects
  • Potential effects on haemostasis
  • Important drug-disease interactions
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Final item list of the DIME

Information should be available on: ICH E7 Q&A Inclusion of patients >65 years in phase III studies X Inclusion of patients >75 years in phase III studies X For drugs used in diseases not unique for, but present in, old persons: inclusion

  • f at least 100 patients >65 years in the phase III studies

X For drugs used in diseases characteristically associated with aging (e.g. Alzheimer's disease): the majority of the clinical database consists of geriatric patients X No exclusion of patients on the basis of an upper age cut-off X No exclusion based on concomitant treatment with drugs commonly prescribed for old persons X The post-marketing data collection in geriatric patients is specified in the Risk Management Plan X

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Final item list

PHARMACOKINETICS

Information should be available on: ICH E7 Huisman et al. A multiple-dose pharmacokinetic study in young versus old persons, if there are age-related differences in pharmacokinetics X The extent of drug accumulation in old persons X The extent of renal clearance of the active substances (i.e. parent compound and/

  • r metabolites) in old persons

X The extent of hepatic clearance of the active substances (i.e. parent compound and/ or metabolites) in old persons X The therapeutic dose range of the drug X The extent of metabolism via or effects on specified CYP450 enzymes X Potential drug-drug interactions, if the therapeutic range of the drug or likely concomitant drugs is narrow, and the likelihood of the concomitant therapy is great X

Huisman et al. Drugs and Aging 2011; 28: 391-402

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Final item list

EFFICACY

Information should be available on: ICH E7 Age-related differences in efficacy X Age-related differences in dose-response X

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Final item list

SAFETY

Information should be available on: ICH E7 Huisman et al. Age-related differences in adverse events X Potential anticholinergic effects (e.g. cognitive decline, delirium, blurred vision, urine retention) X Potential sedative effects X Potential orthostatic effects X Potential effects on the locomotor system (e.g. decline of mobility, increased incidence of falls) X Potential cardiovascular side effects (e.g. arrhythmias, ischemic effects) X Potential effects on haemostasis (e.g. thrombotic effects, bleeding risk) X Important drug-disease interactions (e.g. exacerbation of heart failure) X

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Final item list

CONVENIENCE OF USE

Information should be available on: Huisman et al. Delphi panel The convenience of use for older persons (dosage form and packaging) X Information should be available about dosing instructions X