a functional electrical stimulation f fes garment
play

A Functional Electrical Stimulation (F (FES) Garment Professor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Functional Electrical Stimulation (F (FES) Garment Professor David Tyler, Rebecca Bennett, Chloe McDonnell, Jane Wood Manchester Fashion Institute Aim Develop a fully textile garment with dry electrodes (alternative to hydrogel


  1. A Functional Electrical Stimulation (F (FES) Garment Professor David Tyler, Rebecca Bennett, Chloe McDonnell, Jane Wood Manchester Fashion Institute

  2. Aim • Develop a fully textile garment with dry electrodes (alternative to hydrogel electrodes) • Screen printed, heat transfer electrode can be designed to any size and shape applicable to end use.

  3. Purpose: Workin ing wit ith patie ients wit ith spin inal cord in inju jury ry • After injury, increased risk of low bone mineral density (osteoporosis) • Increased risk of fracture • Lengthy hospital stays – possible increase in mortality risk

  4. Purpose: Workin ing wit ith patie ients wit ith spin inal cord in inju jury ry • Bone adaptation achieved through weight bearing exercise • Functional electrical stimulation (FES) – controlled movement in people with paralysis • Electrodes target muscle fibres • Controlled movements

  5. Purpose: Workin ing wit ith patie ients wit ith spin inal cord in inju jury ry • Electrodes currently ‘strapped’ to patient • Is there a way of incorporating these into a garment? • Textile electrodes have extended lifetime vs hydrogel

  6. Materials • Screen printed electrode • Synthetic / elastane • Zip • Velcro • Metal press stud

  7. Methods • Tests on able-bodied participant to measure torque and pain threshold • Position of electrodes based on standard location used by practitioners. • Tested using hydrogel electrodes. • Repeated using dry electrodes (screen printed and heat transferred onto garment)

  8. Methods • 30Hz square wave pulses at 10mA intervals generated for 2 seconds • Each step increased by 10mA up to 60mA • Torque measurement taken at each step. • Results compared

  9. Findings • Velcro provided easiest donning / doffing solution • Compression had no beneficial effect on resistance of electrode, though comfort was noted by user. • Ease of electrode positioning

  10. Findings • Dry electrode was activated at 10mA higher than the hydrogel electrode . • Equal results to 60mA • Repeats at 60mA resulted in large jump in torque

  11. Conclusion • ‘ Garment’ design is suitable - facilitates easy donning/doffing - adequate compression • Screen -printed electrodes - Jump in torque for 60mA unclear and remains to be investigated • Future work will examine dry and wet state, extension and recovery of electrodes

  12. The Future • Explore potential wider physiotherapy applications • Home use? • Activity stimulation for those less mobile • Possible incorporation into garments to apply to different muscle groups

  13. Questions?

  14. Contact Rebecca Bennett: Rebecca.bennett@mmu.ac.uk Chloe McDonnell: C.McDonnell@mmu.ac.uk Professor David Tyler: D.Tyler@mmu.ac.uk Jane Wood: J.E.Wood@mmu.ac.uk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend